Abstract
Research on the sexual double standard (SDS) indicates its maintenance among college students, despite some attenuation and the emergence of alternative standards. Results show some inconsistencies, however, which highlight conceptual and methodological weaknesses that limit conclusions about the existence and expression of the SDS. One response entails distinguishing personal acceptance of the SDS from its social existence; maintenance of the SDS may reside in the latter, as there is some evidence for a decline in personal but not in social SDS. We aimed to analyse Portuguese college students’ perceptions about the social SDS and to develop a comprehensive model for it. Four male (n = 30) and four female (n = 17) focus groups were conducted with data analysis framed by Grounded Theory. The social SDS emerged especially with regard to casual sex and multiple partners, legitimized by the accepted/recognized existence of sexual gender roles and stereotypes. It is maintained through conformity with SDS and gender prescriptions in order to prove/protect femininity, masculinity and sexual reputation. The process reduces sexual autonomy and has drawbacks for sexual health and wellbeing. Our comprehensive model can inform deconstructive strategies to promote egalitarian, liberal, and positive sexual experiences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, R., & Risman, B. (2013). A double standard for “Hooking Up”: How far have we come toward gender equality? Social Science Research, 42, 1191–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.006.
Armstrong, E., England, P., & Fogarty, A. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77, 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412445802.
Berkowitz, A. D. (2011). How college men feel about being men and “doing the right thing”. In J. A. Laker & T. Davis (Eds.), Masculinities in higher education: Theoretical and practical considerations. New York: Routledge.
Blakmore, J. E., Berenbaum, S. A., & Liben, L. S. (2009). Gender development. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Bordini, G. S., & Sperb, T. M. (2013). Sexual double standard: A review of the literature between 2001 and 2010. Sexuality and Culture, 17, 686–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-012-9163-0.
Brickell, C. (2006). The sociological construction of gender and sexuality. The Sociological Review, 54, 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00603.x.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
Chmielewski, J., Tolman, D., & Kincaid, H. (2017). Constructing risk and responsibility: A gender, race and class analysis of news representations of adolescent sexuality. Feminist Media Studies, 17, 412–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1283348.
Clarke, M., Marks, A., & Lykins, A. (2015). Effects of normative masculinity on males’ dysfunctional sexual beliefs, sexual attitudes, and perceptions of sexual functioning. The Journal of Sex Research, 52, 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.860072.
Conley, T., Ziegler, A., & Moors, A. (2012). Backlash from the bedroom: Stigmata mediates gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312467169.
Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552163.
Damme, E., & Biltereyst, D. (2013). Let’s talk about sex: Audience research of Flemish teenage television viewers and their view on sexuality. Journal of Youth Studies, 16, 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2012.710744.
Danube, C., Norris, J., Stappenbeck, C., Davis, K., George, W., Zawacki, T., et al. (2016). Partner type, sexual double standard endorsement, and ambivalence predict abdication and unprotected sex intentions in a community sample of young women. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 601–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1061631.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2004). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 265–269). New York: The Guildford Press.
Emmerink, P., Vanwesenbeeck, I., van den Eijnden, R., & Bogt, T. (2016). Psychosexual correlates of sexual double standard endorsement in adolescent sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1030720.
Endendijk, J., van Baar, J., & Dekovi, M. (2019). He is a stud, she is a slut! A meta-analysis on the continued existence of sexual double standards. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24, 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868319891310.
England, P., & Bearak, J. (2014). The sexual double standard and gender differences in attitudes toward casual sex among U.S. university students. Demographic Research, 30(46), 1327–1338. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2014.30.46.
Esterline, K., & Muehlenhard, C. (2017). Wanting to be seen: Young people’s experience of performative making out. Journal of Sex Research, 54(8), 1051–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1242111.
Farvid, P., Braun, V., & Rowney, C. (2016). ‘No girl wants to be called a slut!’: Women, heterosexual casual sex and the sexual double standard. Journal of Gender Studies, 26, 544–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1150818.
Fasula, A. M., Carry, M., & Miller, K. S. (2014). A multidimensional framework for the meaning of the sexual double standard and its application for the health of young black women in the U.S. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.716874.
Fjaer, E., Pedersen, W., & Sandberg, S. (2015). “I’m not one of those girls”: Boundary-work and the sexual double standard in a liberal hookup context. Gender & Society, 29, 960–981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215602107.
Flood, M. (2013). Male and female sluts. Shifts and stabilities in the regulation of sexual relations among young heterosexual men. Australian Feminist Studies, 28, 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2012.758024.
Frias, A. (2014). Duplo padrão sexual e contraceção nos adolescentes. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 1(1), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v1.381.
Garcia, J., Reiber, C., Massey, S., & Merrywether, A. (2012). Sexual hookup: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16, 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027911.
Gentry, M. (1998). The sexual double standard: The influence of number of relationships and level of sexual activity on judgments of women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 505–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00173.x.
Hackathorn, J., & Harvey, R. (2011). Sexual double standards: Bias in perceptions of cyber-infidelity. Sexuality and Culture, 15, 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-010-9082-x.
Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society, 23, 589–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209345829.
Hess, A., Menegatos, L., & Savage, M. (2015). Shaming Jane: A feminist Foucauldian analysis of how college students employ the sexual double standard in peer interventions. Women’s Studies in Communication, 38, 462–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2015.1085476.
Howard, J. A., & Hollander, J. A. (1997). Gendered situations, gendered selves: A gender lens on social psychology. London: SAGE.
Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552169.
Jackson, S. M., & Cram, F. (2003). Disrupting the sexual double standard: Young women talk about heterosexuality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603763276153.
Jonason, P. K., & Fisher, T. D. (2009). The power of prestige: Why young men report having more sex partners than young women. Sex Roles, 60, 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9506-3.
Jonason, P. K., & Marks, M. J. (2009). Common versus uncommon sexual acts: Evidence for the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 66, 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9542-z.
Jones, D. (2016). The “chasing Amy” bias in past sexual experiences: Men can change, women cannot. Sexuality and Culture, 20, 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9307-0.
Kalish, R. (2013). Masculinities and hooking-up: Sexual decision-making at college. Culture, Society & Masculinities, 5, 147–165. https://doi.org/10.3149/CSM.0502.147.
Kettrey, H. (2016). What’s gender got to do with it? Sexual double standard and power in heterosexual college hookups. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 754–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1145181.
Kreager, D., Staff, J., Gauthier, R., Lefkowitz, E., & Feinberg, M. (2016). The double standard at sexual debut: Gender, sexual behaviour and adolescent peer acceptance. Sex Roles, 75, 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0618-x.
Krueger, R. A. (1998). Developing questions for focus groups. California: SAGE Publications.
Lyons, H., Giordano, P. C., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2011). Identity, peer relationship and adolescent girl’s sexual behavior: An exploration of the contemporary double standard. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 437–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2010.506679.
Marecek, J., Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2004). On the construction of gender, sex and sexualities. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Bell, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Psychology of gender (pp. 192–216). New York: The Guilford Press.
Marks, M. J. (2008). Evaluations of sexually active men and women under divided attention: A social cognitive approach to the sexual double standard. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701866664.
Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2006). Confirmation bias and the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 54, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-8866-9.
Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2007). The impact of social interaction on the sexual double standard. Social Influence, 2, 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510601154413.
Marks, M., Young, T., & Zaikman, Y. (2019). The sexual double standard in the real world: Evaluations of sexually active friends and acquaintances. Social Psychology, 50, 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000362.
Marques, N., Vieira, R., & Pechorro, P. (2013). The sexual double standard in a masculine way: A Portuguese transgenerational perspective. Revista Internacional de Andrología, 11, 138–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.androl.2013.06.001.
Mascheroni, G., Vincent, J., & Jimenez, E. (2015). “Girls are addicted to likes so they post semi-naked selfies”: Peer mediation, normativity and the construction of identity online. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9(5), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.5817/cp2015-1-5.
McCarthy, B., & Bodnar, L. (2005). The equity model of sexuality: Navigating and negotiating the similarities and differences between men and women in sexual behavior, roles and values. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990500113229.
Milhausen, R., & Herold, E. (1999). Does the sexual double standard still exist? Perceptions of university women. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909552008.
Milhausen, R., & Herold, E. (2001). Reconceptualizing the sexual double standard. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 13, 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v13n02_05.
O’Sullivan, L. F. (1995). Less is more: The effects of sexual experience on judgements of men’s and women’s personality characteristics and relationship desirability. Sex Roles, 33, 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544609.
Papp, L., Hagerman, C., Gnoleba, M., Erchull, M., Liss, M. K., Miles-McLean, H., et al. (2015). Exploring perceptions of slut-shaming on Facebook: Evidence for a reverse sexual double standard. Gender Issues, 32, 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-014-9133-y.
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017504.
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2011). Gender differences in sexual attitudes and behaviors: A review of meta-analytic results and large datasets. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.551851.
Ramos, V., Carvalho, C. C., & Leal, I. P. (2005). Atitudes e comportamentos sexuais de mulheres universitárias: a hipótese do duplo padrão [Sexual attitudes and behaviors among women college students: The hypothesis of sexual double standard]. Análise Psicológica, 23, 173–185. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.80.
Reid, J., Elliot, S., & Webber, G. (2011). Casual hookups to formal dates: Refining the boundaries of the sexual double standard. Gender & Society, 25, 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211418642.
Reid, J., Webber, G., & Elliot, S. (2015). It’s like being in a church and being on a field trip: The date versus party situation in college students’ accounts of hooking up. Symbolic Interaction, 38, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.153.
Reiss, I. (1960). Premarital sexual standards in America (pp. 89–116). Illinois: The Free Press in Glencoe.
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and “sexting”: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14, 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113499853.
Rudman, L., Fetterolf, J., & Sanchez, D. (2012). What motivates sexual double standard? More support for male versus female control theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212472375.
Rudman, L., & Glick, O. (2008). The social psychology of gender. How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: The Guilford Press.
Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A. (2012). Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.653699.
Shoveller, J. A., Johnson, J. L., Langille, D. B., & Mitchell, T. (2004). Socio-cultural influences on young people’s sexual development. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.017.
Soller, B., & Haynie, D. (2017). Variation in sexual double standards across schools: How do they matter for adolescent sexual behavior? Sociological Perspectives, 60, 702–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121416668865.
Sprecher, S., McKinney, K., & Orbuch, T. (1991). The effect of current sexual behavior on friendship, dating, and marriage desirability. Journal of Sex Research, 28, 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499109551615.
Sprecher, S., Regan, P., McKinney, K., Maxwell, K., & Wazienski, R. (1997). Preferred level of sexual experience in a date or mate: The merger of two methodologies. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499709551901.
Sprecher, S., Treger, S., & Sakaluk, J. (2013). Premarital sexual standard and sociosexuality: Gender, ethnicity, and cohort differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1395–1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0145-6.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.
Young, M., Penhollow, T., & Bailey, W. (2010). Hookup and condom provision: Is there a double standard? American Journal of Health Studies, 25(3), 156–164.
Zaikman, Y., & Marks, M. (2017). Promoting theory-based perspectives in sexual double standard research. Sex Roles, 76, 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0677.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Comissão de Ética e Deontologia da Investigação, Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Eucação, Universidade de Coimbra) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Delgado Amaro, H., Alvarez, MJ. & Ferreira, J.A. Portuguese College Students’ Perceptions About the Social Sexual Double Standard: Developing a Comprehensive Model for the Social SDS. Sexuality & Culture 25, 733–755 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09791-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09791-9