Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Condom

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since time immemorial the condom has been a tool for barrier contraception worldwide. Its role in prevention of sexually transmitted infections is remarkably significant for mankind. Its use in non-contraceptive fields is worth knowing as well. The transition of this amazing tool over the ages in form of material, texture, properties, colour etc. is not only unique but also a feat of human expertise and excellence. The commercial worth of this industry illustrates its importance in society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source https://www.elitereaders.com/history-and-evolution-of-condoms/

Fig. 2

Source https://www.elitereaders.com/history-and-evolution-of-condoms/

Fig. 3

Source Wikipedia

Fig. 4

Source https://www.elitereaders.com/history-and-evolution-of-condoms/

Fig. 5

Source Amy and Thiery (2015)

Fig. 6

Source Amy and Thiery (2015)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Advertisement/Pessary/Sheath (1891). Accessed March 13, 2015 from: http://lisahistory.net/hist111/pw/docs/pessary.htm.

  • Akhter, S., Begum, M. R., & Kabir, J. (2005). Condom hydrostatic tamponade for massive postpartum hemorrhage. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 90, 134–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, S. E., D-Day, June 6, 1944: The climactic battle of World War II. New York: Simon and Schuster.

  • Amy, J. J. (2006). Management of severe postpartum haemorrhage: An updated protocol. European Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2, 146–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amy, J. J., & Thiery, M. (2015). The condom: A turbulent history. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 20(5), 387–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boskey, E. (2018). When to choose lubricated or non-lubricated condoms. Available October 11, 2018 from https://www.verywellhealth.com/condoms-lubricated-3132697.

  • Condom. Accessed February 27, 2015 from: http://www.madehow.com/Volume2/Condom.html.

  • Cooper, B. G., Chin, S. L., Xiao, R., Buch, K., Kim, D., & Grinstaff, M. W. (2018). Friction lowering capabilities and human subject preferences for a hydrophilic surface coating on latex substrates: implications for increasing condom usage. Royal Society Open Science, 5, 180291. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalsimer, I. A., Piottrow, P. T., & Dumm, J. J. (1973). Population report. Barrier methods, Series H, No. 1, H2. Georgia: Department of Medical and Public Affairs, The George Washington University Medical Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, P. (1965). The birth controllers (p. 17). London: Seker & Warburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaimster, D., Boland, P., Linnane, S., & Cartwright, C. R. (1996). The archaeology of private life: The Dudley Castle condoms. British Irish Archeology Bibliography, Series ‘Post-Medieval Archeology’, 30(1), 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, M. F., Grimes, D. A., Lopez, L. M., Schulz, K. F. (2006). Non-latex versus latex male condoms for contraception. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, 25(1), CD003550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genuis, S. J. (2008). Are condoms the answer to rising rates of non-HIV sexually transmitted infection? BMJ, 336, 185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M., Skinner, C., & Kaler, W. (2016). External collection devices as an alternative to the indwelling urinary catheter. Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 43(3), 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. (1971). The curious history of contraception (p. 78). London: Ebury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J. A., & Hirsch, J. S. (2008). Pleasure, power, and inequality: Incorporating sexuality into research on contraceptive use. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1803–1813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • High, K. (2018). Emergency care essentials: Recognition and emergency management of pneumothorax. Accessed January 27, 2018 from http://www.emsvillage.com/articles/.

  • Himes, N. E. (1936). Medical history of contraception. New York: Williams & Wilkins, 1936. (Reprinted, New York: Schocken Books, 1970).

  • Himes, N. E. (1963). Medical history ofcontraception. New York: St. Martin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, R., & Duff, P. (1993). Sheathing the endovaginal ultrasound probe: Is it adequate? Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics Gynecology, 1, 37–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joel, S. (2018). Condom History—From Sheep Intestines To Latex. Retrieved October 5, 2018 from https://allthatsinteresting.com/history-of-condoms.

  • Leynadier, F., Mounedji, N., Pecquet, C., et al. (1997). L’allergie au latex: Symptômes et indications thé rapeutiques. Rev Fr Allergol Immunol Clin, 37, 556–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marfatia, Y. S., Pandya, I., & Mehta, K. (2015). Condoms: Past, present, and future. Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases AIDS, 36(2), 133–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, M. J., Dominik, R., Rountree, R. W., et al. (2003). Contraceptive effectiveness of a polyurethane condom and a latex condom: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 101(539–47), 1026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopes, M. C. (1924). Contraception (birth control). Its theory, history and practice. London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatum, H. J., & Connell-Tatum, E. B. (1981). Barrier contraception—A comprehensive overview. Fertility and Sterility, 36(1), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesselius, J., Hollander, J. M. (1990). Anticonceptie als tijdloos probleem. Van primitieve hulpmiddelen tot geavanceerde technieken. Hoogland, The Netherlands: Mediselect bv 1990.

  • Youssef, H. (1993). The history of the condom. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 86(4), 226–228.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, ESIPGIMSR, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India

    Sundeep Chowdhry, Prashansa Jaiswal, Paschal D’Souza & Tapan Kumar Dhali

Authors
  1. Sundeep Chowdhry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prashansa Jaiswal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paschal D’Souza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tapan Kumar Dhali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sundeep Chowdhry.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chowdhry, S., Jaiswal, P., D’Souza, P. et al. The Condom. Sexuality & Culture 23, 674–683 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9579-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9579-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation