Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Constructing Sexuality: A Theory of Stability and Fluidity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theories of human sexuality often rely on bio-evolutionary factors to explain sexual desire and development. Theories that do focus on socio-cultural factors tend to provide limited explanation of individual psychological underpinnings of sexual desire and behaviour. This paper presents an alternative, psychosocial account based on personal construct theory. The role of experience, including the active and constant interpretation of both external and internal events, is afforded a central role. Choice is recognized also as important but only in a channelized or limited manner. Although empirical support is very limited at this point in time, we believe that this theory represents a compelling and testable account of sexual desire and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balnaves, M., Caputi, P., & Oades, L. (2000). A theory of social action: Why personal construct theory needs a super-pattern corollary. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 13, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, D., & Mair, J. M. M. (1968). The evaluation of personal constructs. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, D. (1979). Personal construct theory and politics. In P. Stringer & D. Bannister (Eds.), Constructs of sociality and individuality (pp. 21–34). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M. (2005). This is my partner, and this is my… partner’s partner: Constructing a polyamorous identity in a monogamous world. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1997). The enigmatic appeal of sexual masochism: Why people desire pain, bondage, and humiliation in sex. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. J. (1996). Exotic becomes erotic: A developmental theory of sexual orientation. Psychological Review, 103, 320–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R., & Bogaert, A. F. (1996). Homosexuality in men and number of older brothers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, A. F. (2004). Asexuality: Prevalence and associated factors in a national probability sample. The Journal of Sex Research, 41, 279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, A. F. (2012). Understanding asexuality. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonarius, J. C. J. (1965). Research in the personal construct theory of George A. Kelly. In B. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 2, pp. 1–46). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickell, C. (2009). Sexualities and dimensions of power. Sexuality and Culture, 13, 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, I. (1996). Social and personal constructs: A division left unresolved. Theory and Psychology, 6, 71–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1998). Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. The Journal of Sex Research, 35, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, E. S. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 8, 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cass, V. C. (1979). Homosexuality identity formation. Journal of Homosexuality, 4, 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin-Keung, L. (1988). PCT interpretation of sexual involvement with children. In F. Fransella & L. Thomas (Eds.), Experimenting with personal construct psychology (pp. 273–286). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2005). A new view of lesbian subtypes: Stable versus fluid identity trajectories over an 8-year period. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2008). Female bisexuality from adolescence to adulthood: Results from a 10-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, L. (2004). On the limits of sexual ethics: The phenomenology of autassassinophilia. Sexuality and Culture, 8, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duck, S. W. (1979). The personal and the interpersonal in construct theory: Social and individual aspects of relationships. In P. Stringer & D. Bannister (Eds.), Constructs of sociality and individuality (pp. 279–298). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, H. (1906). Studies in the psychology of sex: Volume II: Sexual inversion. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company (Original work published 1901).

  • Ellis, H. (1913). Studies in the psychology of sex: Volume VI: Sex in relation to society. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company (Original work published 1910).

  • Epting, F. R. (1984). Personal construct counseling and psychotherapy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Freud, S. (1955). An outline of psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press (Original work published 1940).

  • Freud, S. (1975). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. New York: Basic Books (Original work published 1905).

  • Freund, K. (1990). Courtship disorder. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault (pp. 195–208). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, J. (2006). Social constructionism and sexual desire. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 13, 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, D. M. (2010). How to be gay. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, R. (1970). George Kelly: Constructive innocent and reluctant existentialist. In D. Bannister (Ed.), Perspectives in personal construct theory (pp. 111–132). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horley, J. (1988). Cognitions of child sexual abusers. The Journal of Sex Research, 25, 542–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horley, J. (2000a). Cognitions supportive of child molestation. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal, 5, 551–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horley, J. (2000b). Constructing an abnormal sexual identity: A personal construct account of perversion. Paper presented at “Understanding the social world: Constructions and identity”, Huddersfield, UK, September.

  • Horley, J. (2005). Issues in forensic psychotherapy. In D. Winter & L. Viney (Eds.), Advances in personal construct psychotherapy (pp. 250–260). London: Whurr Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horley, J. (2008). Sexual offenders: Personal construct theory and deviant sexual behaviour. Hove: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horley, J. (2012). Personal construct theory and human values. Journal of Human Values, 18, 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horley, J., & Clarke, J. (2016). Experience, meaning, and identity in sexuality: A psychosocial theory of sexual stability and change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horley, J., & Quinsey, V. L. (1994). Assessing the cognitions of child molesters: Use of the semantic differential with incarcerated offenders. The Journal of Sex Research, 31, 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horley, J., Quinsey, V. L., & Jones, S. (1997). Incarcerated child molesters’ perceptions of themselves and others. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9, 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, J. (1998). Making sense with offenders: Personal constructs, therapy, and change. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells, K. (1979). Some meanings of children for pedophiles. In M. Cook & G. Wilson (Eds.), Love and attraction (pp. 519–526). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Iuduci, A., & Verdecchia, M. (2015). Homophobic labeling in the process of identity construction. Sexuality and Culture, 19, 737–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, M. (1988). The range of convenience of personal construct psychology: An outsider's view. In F. Fransella & L. Thomas (Eds.), Experimenting with personal construct psychology (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. (2015). Sexuality: A psychosocial manifesto. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz-Wise, S. L. (2015). Sexual fluidity in young adult women and men: Associations with sexual orientation and sexual identity development. Psychology and Sexuality, 6, 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauth, M. R. (2005). Revealing assumptions: Explicating sexual orientation and promoting conceptual integrity. Journal of Bisexuality, 5, 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vol. 2). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1963). A theory of personality. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1970a). A brief introduction to personal construct theory. In D. Bannister (Ed.), Perspectives in personal construct theory (pp. 1–29). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1970b). Behavior is an experiment. In D. Bannister (Ed.), Perspectives in personal construct theory (pp. 255–269). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsman, G. (1996). Regulation of desire (2nd ed.). Toronto: Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landfield, A. W. (1971). Personal construct systems in psychotherapy. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landfield, A. W., & Epting, F. R. (1987). Personal construct psychology: Clinical and personality assessment. New York: Human Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, L. M., Begley, E. A., & Faidley, A. J. (1996). Sociality, commonality, individuality, and mutuality: A personal construct approach to non-dominant groups. In D. Kalekin-Fishman & B. Walker (Eds.), The construction of group realities: Culture, society, and personal construct theory (pp. 323–340). Malabar: Krieger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVay, S. (1993). The sexual brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVay, S. (2011). Gay, straight, and the reason why: The science of sexual orientation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers of Kurt Lewin. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, M. M. (1977). A reconstruction of emotion. In D. Bannister (Ed.), New perspectives in personal construct theory (pp. 93–124). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, M. M. (1981). Positive and negative emotion: A personal construct theory interpretation. In H. Bonarius, R. Holland, & S. Rosenberg (Eds.), Personal construct psychology: Recent advances in theory and practice (pp. 95–104). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1977). Self. In A. Strauss (Ed.), George Herbert Mead: On social psychology (pp. 199–246). Chicago: University of Chicago Press (Original work published 1934).

  • Mischel, T. (1964). Personal constructs, rules, and the logic of clinical activity. Psychological Review, 71, 180–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, R. A. (1985). The development of personal construct psychology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, S. H. (1980). The social psychology of power. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Procter, H., & Parry, G. (1978). Constraint and freedom: The social origin of personal constructs. In F. Fransella (Ed.), Personal construct psychology 1977 (pp. 157–170). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, J. D. (1995). On ethics in personal construct theory. The Humanistic Psychologist, 23, 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. (1994). Wanting everything: The art of happiness. London: Harper Collins.

  • Scimecca, J. A. (1977). Labeling theory and personal construct theory: Toward the measurement of individual variation. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 68, 652–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22, 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (2003). Sexual scripts: Origins, influences, and changes. Qualitative Sociology, 26, 491–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, B. (1985). A comparison of evolutionary and environmental theories of erotic response. Part 1: Structural features. Journal of Sex Research, 21, 229–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1999). Writing the social: Critique, theory and investigation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, P. (1979). Individuals, roles, and persons. In P. Stringer & D. Bannister (Eds.), Constructs of sociality and individuality (pp. 91–114). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Krafft-Ebing, R. (1935). Psychopathia sexualis: A medico-forensic study (12th ed.). New York: Physicians and Surgeons Book Company. (Original work published 1886).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. M., & Winter, D. A. (2007). The elaboration of personal construct psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 453–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, W. (1998). Philosophical dimensions of personal construct psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson, W. S. (2007). Ambiguity and sexuality: A theory of sexual identity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson, W. S. (2009). Is it a choice? Sexual orientation as interpretation. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40, 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. A. (1992). Personal construct psychology in clinical practice: Theory, research and applications. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, R. L., Savoy, H. B., Dillon, F. R., & Vernaglia, E. R. (2002). Heterosexual identity development: A multidimensional model of individual and social identity. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 496–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrong, D. (1979). Power: Its forms, bases, and uses. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Sciences, University of Alberta, Augustana Campus, Camrose, AB, T4V 2R3, Canada

    James Horley

  2. Algoma University, Sault Sainte Marie, ON, Canada

    Jan Clarke

Authors
  1. James Horley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Clarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Horley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horley, J., Clarke, J. Constructing Sexuality: A Theory of Stability and Fluidity. Sexuality & Culture 20, 906–922 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9364-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9364-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation