Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Naturalizing insecurity: resilience and drug-related Organized Crime in the Americas

  • Published:
Trends in Organized Crime Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article critically interrogates the political effect of portraying drug-related organized crime in the Americas as a resilient market phenomenon. It works out how both drug demand and supply are constructed as immune to repressive policy interventions of the War on Drugs. Drug demand is seen as a pathologic consumer habit which is inelastic to price changes brought about by interdiction. Drug supply, in turn, cannot be permanently suppressed as the ‘balloon effect’ ensures that trafficking routes merely shift from one country to another. In this discursive framework, policy making is consigned to perpetual adaption rather than purposive social transformation. In consequence, the political horizon of international policy making is limited to living with danger. This discursive move is facilitated by the resilience approach which consigns human communities to coping with threats and upheavals they can no longer have any hope of overcoming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to a recent study by México Evalúa, over 90% of crimes in the country remain unpunished (Monroy 2020). Mexico has a serious organized crime problem. In 2020, the murder rate was 29 per 100,000 (Romero 2021). The year 2017 saw a record number of murders with 29,158 homicides (Cole 2018).

  2. There are currently more than 90,600 desaparecidos in Mexico (Urrutia 2021). There are more than sixty dedicated groups of trackers (rastreadores) in Mexico (Zatarain 2020). The issue of forced disappearances in Mexico gained international attention after the abduction of 43 school children in Ayotzinapa (Guerrero) in 2014 (see, for example, Committee on Enforced Disappearances 2015).

  3. Likewise, the victims of disappearances are usually marginalized and lower-class people: ‘poor men and women, low-ranking delinquents, disposable manual laborers’ (Elizalde 2022, 131, author’s translation; see AFP 2021). What is more, the victims of disappearances are often stigmatized as ‘linked to illegal activities and victims of the settling of scores’ (Martos 2017, 22, author’s translation).

  4. For a feminist reading of Las Buscadoras as women moving beyond passive, domestic roles, see Iliná (2020). Iliná argues that the women of Las Buscadoras challenge their traditional gender roles and actively defy the state (2020, 133). In equally positive terms, Cynthia Bejarano calls the women of Las Buscadoras ‘super mothers’ (2002). She sees them as resisting state control and gendered citizenship roles (Bejarano 2002).

  5. In the case of Mexico, Ted Enamorado et al. have found a clear causal link between economic inequality and drug-related homicides. According to their quantitative study of Calderón’s War on Drugs, a ‘one-point increase in the Gini coefficient raised the number of drug-related deaths per 100,000 inhabitants by 36%’ (Enamorado et al. 2016, 135). This causal link between inequality and crime is confirmed by comparative cross-country analysis (Fajnzylber, Lederman, and Loayza 2002). Pablo Fajnzylber et al. find that ‘an increase in income inequality has a significant and robust effect of raising crime rates’ (2002, 7).

  6. In contrast, Marcelo Bergman has argued that rising crime in Latin America is, in fact, a consequence of growing prosperity (2018). He sees no empirical evidence for the claim that growing inequality and lack of economic development lead to violent crime. However, he concedes that the Washington Consensus of the 1990s has produced more social exclusion, unemployment and inequality in the region (Bergman 2018, 104). Contra Bergman, I argue that reducing violent crime in Latin America does require ‘fundamental social or structural changes’ (Bergman 2018, 307).

References

  • Abu-Hamdeh S (2011) ‘The Merida Initiative: An Effective Way of Reducing Violence in Mexico?’. Pepperdine Policy Review 4:37–54

    Google Scholar 

  • AFP (2021) ‘Bastaría “Un Hueso”, La Búsqueda Desesperada de 95.000 Desaparecidos En México’, 1 December 2021. https://www.france24.com/es/minuto-a-minuto/20211201-bastar%C3%ADa-un-hueso-la-b%C3%BAsqueda-desesperada-de-95-000-desaparecidos-en-m%C3%A9xico

  • Astorga L (2010) ‘Drug Trafficking Organizations and Counter-Drug Strategies in the U.S.-Mexican Context’. In Shared Responsibility. U.S.-Mexico Policy Options for Confronting Organized Crime, edited by Eric Olson, David Shirk, and Andrew Selee, 31–62. Washington, D.C. and San Diego: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and University of San Diego

  • Ayling J (2009) ‘Criminal Organizations and Resilience’. Int J Law Crime Justice 37(4):182–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bejarano C (2002) ‘Las Super Madres de Latino America: Transforming Motherhood by Challenging Violence in Mexico, Argentina, and El Salvador’. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 23(1):126–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman M (2018) More Money, More Crime. Prosperity and Rising Crime in Latin America. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard M (2007) ‘On the Resilience of Illegal Drug Markets’. Global Crime 8(4):325–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bow B (2013) ‘Beyond Mérida? The Evolution of the U.S. Response to Mexico’s Security Crisis’. In The State and Security in Mexico: Transformation and Crisis in Regional Perspective, edited by Brian Bow and Arturo Santa-Cruz, 77–98. New York: Routledge

  • Brands H (2009) Mexico’s Narco-Insurgency and U.S. Counterdrug Policy. U.S. Army War College, Carlisle

    Google Scholar 

  • Brassett J, Croft S, Nick Vaughan-Williams (2013) ‘Introduction: An Agenda for Resilience Research in Politics and International Relations’. Politics 33(4):221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen L (2008) A Primer on Plan Mexico. Americas Policy Program Special Report. Center for International Policy, Washington, D.C. www.cipamericas.org/archives/1474

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler D (2019) ‘Resilience and the End(s) of the Politics of Adaptation’. Resilience 7(3):304–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coaffee J (2013) ‘Rescaling and Responsibilizing the Politics of Urban Resilience: From National Security to Local Place-Making’. Politics 33(4):240–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole B (2018) ‘Is Cancun Safe? 14 Killed in Brutal Crime Spree at Mexican Resort Town’. Newsweek, 13 April 2018

  • Concluding Observations on the Report Submitted by Mexico under Article 29, Paragraph 1, of the Convention. Geneva: Committee on Enforced Disappearances, Nations U (2015). file:///C:/Users/ad0262/Downloads/CED_C_MEX_CO_1-EN.pdf

  • Dunn Cavelty, Myriam M, Kaufmann, Kristian Søby K (2015) ‘Resilience and (In)Security: Practices, Subjects, Temporalities’. Secur Dialogue 46(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elizalde M (2022) ‘Mujeres Buscadoras En Sonora. Transformaciones Subjetivas Frente a La Violencia’. Argumentos Estudios Críticos De La Sociedad 1(97):123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enamorado T, López-Calva L Carlos Rodríguez-Castelán, and Hernán Winkler (2016) ‘Income Inequality and Violent Crime: Evidence from Mexico’s Drug War’.Journal of Development Economics, no.120:128–43

  • Evans B, and Julian Reid (2014) Resilient Life. The Art of Living Dangerously. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Fajnzylber P, Loayza N (2002) ‘Inequality and Violent Crime’. J Law Econ 45(1):1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felix SG (2017) Resilience in Sinaloa: Community Responses to Organized Crim. The Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkenbusch P (2017) Rethinking Neo-Institutional Statebuilding. The Knowledge Paradox of International Statebuilding. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (2004) The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Picador, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesendorf C (2007) US Foreign Policy and the War on Drugs. Displacing the Cocaine and Heroin Industry. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office (GAO) (1996) Drug Control: U.S. Heroin Program Encounters Many Obstacles in Southeast Asia. Government Accountability Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera J (2019) ‘Cultivating Violence: Trade Liberalization, Illicit Labor, and the Mexican Drug Trade’. Lat Am Politics Soc 61(3):129–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iliná N (2020) ‘“¡Tu Madre Está En La Lucha!” La Dimensión de Género En La Búsqueda de Desaparecidos En Nuevo León, México’. Íconos Revista de Ciencias Sociales 24(67):119–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Insulza J (2013) The Drug Problem in the Americas: The Economics of Drug Trafficking. Organization of American States, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview with Eric Olson and David Shirk, Center W, Washington DC (2010) Interview by Peter Finkenbusch. Notes and audio recording

  • Joseph J (2013) ‘Resilience as Embedded Neoliberalism: A Governmentality Approach’. Resilience 1(1):38–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffiteau C (2011) ‘The Balloon Effect: The Failure of Supply Side Strategies in the War on Drugs’. www.academia.edu/889972/the_balloon_effect_the_failure_of_supply_side_strategies_in_the_war_on_drugs

  • Martos A (2017) Informe Sobre Desapariciones En El Estado de Nuevo León Con Información de Cadhac. Mexico City: FLACSO Mexico. https://odim.juridicas.unam.mx/sites/default/files/Observatorio%20-%20Informe%20NL%20%28Final%29.pdf

  • Monroy J (2020) ‘Quedan En La Impunidad 92.4% de Delitos En El País’. El Economista, 23 October 2020. https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/politica/Quedan-en-la-impunidad-92.4-de-delitos-en-el-pais-20201023-0010.html

  • National Research Council (2010) Understanding the Demand for Illegal Drugs. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Society Foundation (2021) Why We Need Drug Policy Reform. Open Society Foundations. https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/explainers/why-we-need-drug-policy-reform

  • Palacios A and Raquel Maroño. (2021) La Feminización de La Búsqueda En México: Conclusiones. Mexico City: Heinrich Böll Stiftung. https://mx.boell.org/es/2021/03/08/la-feminizacion-de-la-busqueda-en-mexico-conclusiones

  • No Están Solas. Acompañar a Los y Las Buscadoras En México. Mexico City: PBI Mexico, Mexico PBI (2021) https://pbi-mexico.org/es/news/2021-08/no-est%C3%A1n-solas-acompa%C3%B1ar-los-y-las-buscadoras-en-m%C3%A9xico#_ftnref2

  • Portes A, and Kelly Hoffman (2003) ‘Latin American Class Structures: Their Composition and Change during the Neoliberal Era’. Latin Am Res Rev 38(1):41–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradilla A (2021) ‘Los Asesinatos de Las Madres “Buscadoras” Muestran El Fracaso Del Estado Mexicano’. The Washington Post, 23 August 2021. https://www.washingtonpost.com/es/post-opinion/2021/08/23/madres-buscadoras-desaparecidos-asesinatos-mexico/

  • Romero T (2021) Mexico: Murder Rate 2009–2020. Hamburg: Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/714113/mexico-homicide-rate/

  • Rouse S, and Moises Arce (2006) ‘The Drug-Laden Balloon: U.S. Military Assistance and Coca Production in the Central Andes’. Soc Sci Q 87(3):540–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sam A (2021) ‘Desapariciones Forzadas y Hallazgo de Fosas Clandestinas En México: El Caso Del Colectivo Madres Buscadoras de Sonora’. Pacha Revista de Estudios Contemporáneos Del Sur Global 2(4):95–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirk D (2011) The Drug War in Mexico. Confronting a Shared Threat. Council Special Report. Council on Foreign Relations, New York. http://www.cfr.org/mexico/drug-war-mexico/p24262

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvestre C (2019) ‘Peinar La Historia a Contrapelo. Reflexiones En Torno a La Búsqueda y Exhumación de Fosas Comunes En México’. Encartes no 3:13–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solís J (2013) ‘Neoliberalismo y Crimen Organizado En México: El Surgimiento Del Estado Narco’. Frontera Norte 25(50):7–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Urrutia A (2021) ‘Desapariciones, Resultado de Política Fallida: Olga Sánchez’.La Jornada, 17 August 2021.

  • U.S. Agency of International Development and Secretaría de Gobernación (2015a) Comités Comunitarios: Una Estrategia Para Fortalecer La Resiliencia Comunitaria. USAID and Secretaría de Gobernación, Mexico City

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Agency of International Development and Secretaría de Gobernación (2015b) Conceptos y Estrategias de Gestión Local. Mexico City: USAID and Secretaría de Gobernación

  • U.S. Agency of International Development and Secretaría de Gobernación (2015c) Guía Para El Diseño de Planes de Intervención Comunitaria. Diagnóstico y Gestión. Mexico City: USAID and Secretaría de Gobernación

  • Congress US (2007) The Merida Initiative: Assessing Plans to Step Up Our Security Cooperation With Mexico and Central America. Hearing before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives 110–135. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office

  • Congress US (2009) Guns, Drugs and Violence: The Merida Initiative and the Challenge in Mexico. Hearing before the Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office

  • Congress US (2011) Merida Part Two: Insurgency and Terrorism in Mexico. Joint Hearing before the Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Management of the Committee on Homeland Security, House of Representatives 112–108, 112–48. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office

  • Congress US (2012) ‘Judicial and Police Reforms in Mexico: Essential Building Blocks for a Lawful Society.’ Report for the Committee on Foreign Relations, Senate US (2012) 112–36. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Printing Office

  • Walker J, and Melinda Cooper (2011) ‘Genealogies of Resilience: From Systems Ecology to the Political Economy of Crisis Adaptation’. Secur Dialogue 42(2):143–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh M (2014) ‘Resilience and Responsibility: Governing Uncertainty in a Complex World’. Geographical J 180(1):15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zatarain AK (2020) ‘Searching with the Mothers of Mexico’s Disappeared’. The New Yorker, 5 August 2020. https://www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/searching-with-the-mothers-of-mexicos-disappeared

Download references

Acknowledgements

n/a.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Finkenbusch.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest related to this submission.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

No research involving animals was conducted for this submission. One expert interview was conducted for this submission. It was with Eric Olson and David Shirk and took place at the Woodrow Wilson Centre in Washington, DC on 6 April 2010.

Informed consent

One interview was conducted for this submission. The interviewees Eric Olson and David Shirk read and signed off the transcript. They agreed to the interview contents being published.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Finkenbusch, P. Naturalizing insecurity: resilience and drug-related Organized Crime in the Americas. Trends Organ Crim (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-022-09454-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-022-09454-1

Keywords

Navigation