Abstract
Slum clearance campaigns and demolition drives have been understood as an integral part of the governance of the Indian city, but little effort has been made to analyze why the Indian state periodically invokes its monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force in this manner. To answer this question, this article analyzes three periods of heightened demolitions in post-independence Mumbai: the mid-1950s, amidst independent state formation; the mid-1970s, during the period of authoritarian rule referred to as the Emergency; and the mid-2000s, when Maharashtra’s Chief Minister initiated a campaign to “transform Mumbai into a world class city.” In each of these periods—as well as during the smaller-scale demolitions that are a consistent feature of life in the city—this article argues that slum evictions cannot be explained solely by what David Harvey and others have referred to as “accumulation by dispossession,” whereby the urban poor is dispossessed to initiate potentially lucrative urban development. Rather, it demonstrates that demolitions are embedded in contestations over authority and sovereignty in the governance of the Indian city. Furthermore, it demonstrates that despite a heightened awareness about this type of state violence, the explanations for demolition drives remain fairly consistent in the current globalizing or neoliberal era.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This article refers to the city as both Mumbai and as its former name, Bombay. When discussing the city pre-1995, when its name was changed to Mumbai, this article uses the former name.
Quoted in Mahadevia and Narayanan (2008).
Quoted in Sainath (2005).
Although I am employing a longitudinal analysis of clearance campaigns, the particular state actors (essentially the independent variables) examined in each case are distinct. In the 1950s, for example, the level of the state carrying out the demolitions was the municipality; in the 1970s, it was the national government, with support from the state-level political party; and in the early 2000s, it was the state-level government. Although the finding of relatively consistent actions carried out by varied state actors may be difficult generalize to other contexts, it is central to the core argument that the fragmented nature of sovereignty leads the state (in its various incarnations and scales) to employ violence in this manner.
For example, see Emma Tarlo (2003).
Thanks to Jennifer Earl for making me aware of this literature.
Author interview November 18, 2005.
Moncada (2013) examines how measures designed by the private sector can become adopted as public policy within the context of the politics of urban violence.
Quoted in Srivastava (2005).
Despite the manner in which his plan linked slum clearance with development, none of these new infrastructure projects were specifically slated for sites of cleared hutments.
It should be noted that the author is presently working with a research team to collect these data over a longer historical period and in a number of major Indian cities.
References
Albert Mayer (1934–1975), Box 17. Archives: University of Chicago Library.
Alvarez-Junco J. Social movements in modern Spain: from the pre-civil war model to contemporary NSMs. In: Laraña E, Johnston H, Gusfield JR, editors. New social movements: from ideology to identity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1994. p. 304–29.
Anand N, Rademacher A. Housing in the urban age: inequality and aspiration in Mumbai. Antipode. 2011;43(5):1748–72.
Appadurai A. Spectral housing and urban cleansing: notes on millennial Mumbai. Public Cult. 2000;12(3):627–51.
Arias ED. The impacts of differential armed dominance of politics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Studies in Comparative International Development 2013; 48(3). doi:10.1007/s12116-013-9137-8.
Arora SK. The reorganization of the Indian states. Far East Surv. 1956;25(2):27–30.
Batra L, Mehra D. Slum demolitions and production of neoliberal space: Delhi. In: Mahadevia D, editor. Inside the transforming urban Asia: processes, policies and public actions. New Delhi: Concept; 2008. p. 391–414.
Baviskar A. Spectacular Events, City Spaces and Citizenship: The Commonwealth Games in Delhi. In: Anjaria JE, McFarlane C, editors. Urban Navigations: Politics, Space and the City in South Asia. New Delhi: Routledge; 2010. p. 138–161.
Bayat A. Activism and social development in the Middle East. Int J Middle East Stud. 2002;34(1):1–28.
Benjamin S. Touts, pirates and ghosts. In: Sarai, editor. Sarai reader: bare acts. New Delhi: Sarai Centre for the Study of Culture; 2005.
Benjamin S. Occupancy urbanism: radicalizing politics and economy beyond policy and programs. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2008;32(3):719–29.
Bhan G. ‘This is no longer the city I once knew’: evictions, the urban poor and the right to the city in millennial Delhi. Environ Urban. 2009;21(1):127–42.
Bhide A. Dynamics and contours of resisting displacement in Mumbai. In: Mahadevia D, editor. Inside the transforming urban Asia: processes, policies and public actions. New Delhi: Concept; 2008. p. 590–600.
Bordoloi SK. Hope is gone: 800 Mumbai families lose battle for survival. South Asian Mail. May 19, 2010. (Accessed online, 4/16/11, 12:30 pm.)
Brenner N. Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in Western Europe 1960–2000. Rev Int Polit Econ. 2004;11(3):447–88.
Brenner N. Urban locational policies and the geographies of post-Keynesian statehood in Western Europe. In: Davis DE, Libertun de Duren N, editors. Cities and sovereignty: identity politics in urban spaces. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2011. p. 152–75.
Chatterjee P. Politics of the governed: popular politics in most of the world. New Delhi: Permanent Black; 2004.
Chatterji R. Plans, habitation and slum redevelopment: the production of community in Dharavi, Mumbai. Contrib Indian Sociol. 2005;39(2):197–218.
Committee for the Right to Housing. Demolitions: driving urban poor to the edge—impact assessment study of demolitions in Mumbai. Mumbai: Committee for the Right to Housing; 2006.
Das PK. Slums: the continuing struggle for housing. In: Patel S, Masselos J, editors. Bombay and Mumbai: the city in transition. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2004.
Davis DE. Theoretical and empirical reflections on cities, sovereignty, identity, and conflict. In: Davis DE, Libertun de Duren N, editors. Cities and sovereignty: identity politics in urban spaces. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2011. p. 226–56.
Davis DE, Libertun de Duran N. Cities and sovereignty: identity politics in urban spaces. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2011.
Dupont V. Slum demolitions in Delhi since the 1990s: an appraisal” Economic & Political Weekly; July 12, 2008: p. 79–87.
First B. Bombay First: adding value to Mumbai. Mumbai: Bombay First; 2009.
Gaikawad R. 2010 rendered homeless after demolition drive. The Hindu; May 21, 2010. (Accessed online, 4/16/11, 12:30pm.)
Ghar Bachao Ghar Banao Andolan. 2010a. “MP Apologises to Anna Bhau Sathe Nagar Slum dwellers,” blog post, May 18, 2010 <http://gharbachao.wordpress.com/> (Accessed online, 4/16/11, 12:30 pm.)
Ghar Bachao Ghar Banao Andolan. 2010b. “Slum dwellers storm Hiranandani Gardens and demand their land,” blog post, May 20, 2010 <http://gharbachao.wordpress.com/> (Accessed online, 4/16/11, 12:30 pm.)
Government of Bombay. Preliminary report of the development of suburbs and town planning panel. Bombay: Post War Development Committee; 1946.
Hansen TB. Wages of violence: naming and identity in post-colonial Bombay. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2001.
Hansen TB. Sovereigns beyond the state: on legality and authority in urban India. In: Hansen TB, Stepputat F, editors. Sovereign bodies: citizens, migrants, and states in the postcolonial world. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2005. p. 169–191.
Hansen TB, Stepputat F. Introduction. In: Hansen TB, Stepputat F, editors. Sovereign bodies: citizens, migrants, and states in the postcolonial world. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2005. p. 1–36.
Harris N. Bombay in the global economy. In: Patel S, Thorner A, editors. Bombay: metaphor for modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 1995. p. 47–63.
Hart G. Denaturalizing dispossession: critical ethnography in the age of resurgent imperialism. Antipode. 2006;38(5):977–1004.
Harvey D. The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
Harvey D. The right to the city. New Left Rev. 2008;53(Sept/Oct 2008):23–40.
Indian Express. Crores to be spent to turn Mumbai into Shanghai. Indian Express; February 8, 2005. (Accessed online, 9/21/11, 3:15 pm.)
Jamwal N. 5,000 families protest slum razing. Down to Earth; July 15, 2010. (Accessed online, 4/16/11, 12:30 pm.)
Kamat AR. Politico-economic developments in Maharashtra: a review of the post-independence period. Economic and Political Weekly 1980; 15(40): 1669–1671 + 1673 + 1675 + 1677–1678.
LeBas A. Violence and urban order in Nairobi, Kenya and Lagos, Nigeria. Studies in Comparative International Development 2013; 48(3). doi:10.1007/s12116-013-9134-y.
Linden A, Klandermans B. Stigmatization and repression of extreme-right activism in the Netherlands. Mobilization. 2006;11(2):213–28.
Lynch O. Political mobilization and ethnicity among Adi-Dravidas in a Bombay slum. Econ Polit Wkly. 1974;9(39):1657–792.
Mahadevia D. State supported segmentation of Mumbai: policy options in the global economy. Rev Dev Chang. 1998;3(1):12–41.
Mahadevia D, Narayanan H. Slumbay to Shanghai: envisioning renewal or takeover. In: Mahadevia D, editor. Inside the transforming urban Asia: processes, policies and public actions. New Delhi: Concept; 2008a. p. 94–169.
Mahadevia D, Narayanan H. Shanghaing Mumbai: politics of evictions and resistance in slum settlements. In: Mahadevia D, editor. Inside the transforming urban Asia: processes, policies and public actions. New Delhi: Concept; 2008b. p. 549–89.
Mahmud T. "Surplus humanity" and the margins of legality: slums, slumdogs, and accumulation by dispossession. Chapman Law Rev. 2010;14(1):1–74.
Manor J. Where congress survived: five states in the Indian general election of 1977. Asian Surv. 1978;18(8):785–803.
Mazumdar R. Bombay cinema: an archive of the city. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2007.
McFarlane C. Postcolonial Bombay: decline of a cosmopolitan city? Environ Plan D Soc Space. 2008;26(3):480–99.
McKinsey, Company. Vision Mumbai: recommendations for transforming Mumbai into a world class city. Mumbai: Bombay First; 2003.
Mistry R. A fine balance. New York: Knopf; 1995.
Moncada E. Business and the politics of urban violence in Colombia. Studies in Comparative International Development 2013; 48(3). doi:10.1007/s12116-013-9135-x.
Mukhija V. Upgrading housing settlements in developing countries: the impact of existing physical conditions. Cities. 2001;18(4):213–22.
O’Hare G, Abbott D, Barke M. A review of slum housing policies in Mumbai. Cities. 1998;15(4):269–83.
Palmer ND. India in 1975: democracy in eclipse. Asian Surv. 1976;17(2):95–110.
Palmer ND. India in 1976: the politics of depoliticization. Asian Surv. 1977;16(2):160–80.
Patel SB. Slum rehabilitation in Mumbai: possible if done differently. Econ Polit Wkly. 1996;31(18):1047–50.
Pinto M, Pinto D. Municipal corporation of greater Mumbai and ward administration. Delhi: Konark; 2005.
Ramesh R. Poor squeezed out by Mumbai's dream plan. The Guardian; March 1, 2005. (Accessed online, 9/21/11, 3:15 pm.)
Roy A. City requiem, Calcutta: gender and the politics of poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2003.
Sainath P. The unbearable lightness of seeing. The Hindu. February 5, 2005. (Accessed online, 9/7/09, 1:15 pm.)
Sanyal K, editor. Rethinking capitalist development: primitive accumulation, governmentality and post-colonial capitalism. New York: Routledge; 2007.
Sharma K. Rediscovering Dharavi: stories from Asia’s largest slum. New Delhi: Penguin; 2000.
South Asian. Slum illegally set on fire, demolished. The South Asian; May 16, 2010. (Accessed online, 4/16/11, 12:30 pm.)
Spodek H. Squatter settlements in urban India: self-help and government policies. Economic and Political Weekly 1983; 18(36/37): pp. 1575–1577 + 1579–1586.
Srinivasan S. Tsunami-like devastation hits Mumbai slum dwellers. Inter Press Service; January 30, 2005. (Accessed online, 9/21/11, 3:15 pm.)
Srivastava S. Mumbai struggles to catch up with Shanghai. Asia Times Online; March 16, 2005. (Accessed online, 9/21/11, 3:15 pm.)
Tarlo E. Unsettling memories: narratives of the emergency in Delhi. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2003.
Tilly C. The politics of collective violence. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
Times of India. Medha Patkar opposes slum demolition. Times of India; May 14, 2010. (Accessed online, 4/16/11, 12:30 pm.)
Weber M. Politics as a vocation. In: Hogarth H and Mills CW, editors. From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press; 1946 [1921]: p. 77–128.
Weinstein L. Mumbai’s development mafias: organized crime, land development, and globalization. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2008;32(1):22–39.
Weinstein L, Ren X. The changing right to the city: urban renewal and housing rights in globalizing Shanghai and Mumbai. City Commun. 2009;8(4):407–32.
Youth for Unity and Voluntary Action (YUVA). 1999. Our home is a slum: an exploration of a community and local government collaboration in a tenants’ struggle to establish legal residency. Unpublished Discussion Paper No. 107, August 1999.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Eduardo Moncada, Diane E. Davis, Smitha Radhakrishnan, Ashutosh Varshney, Sam Cohen, Jennifer Earl, and the participants in the Brown University conference, "Violent Cities: Challenges of Democracy, Development, and Governance in the Urban Global South," for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weinstein, L. Demolition and Dispossession: Toward an Understanding of State Violence in Millennial Mumbai. St Comp Int Dev 48, 285–307 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-013-9136-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-013-9136-9