Skip to main content
Log in

Symbolism and Power in David Martin’s Sociology of Religion

  • Symposium: The Achievement of David Martin
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article suggests that symbolism and power are central concepts in the massive volume of David Martin’s work, which is underpinned and sustained by a dynamic dialectic tension between the religious and the secular. For Martin, the core characteristic element of the religious is the transcendent which is in constant dialectic with the secular in history and society through the functions and uses and abuses of power. Politics and religion, thus, are explored within the same mythic symbolic theoretical/methodological framework as, according to Martin, ‘there is no logos without mythos’. All this is theoretically depicted and empirically documented mainly in his General Theory of Secularization (1978), his Religion and Power (2014) and in his Breaking of the Image (1980). The latter is a masterpiece of symbolist analysis and interpretation of Christian theory and practice with a universal sociological application and significance. This specific hermeneutic symbolist approach of Martin is original and promotes a diachronic and synchronic sociological and theological understanding of religion as such and of religion in society. Within this framework Martin also provides us with a wider understanding of social change beyond the context and the limits of modernity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See his complete bibliography in Joas 2018:191–208)

  2. This impasse is clearly stated at the end in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. (‘No one knows who will live in this cage in the future…..’) (Weber 1968 : 182).

  3. See for example: Douglas (1970), Sperber (1975), Leach (1976); Geertz (1975); Dolgin et al. (1979); Firth (1973); Turner (1967, 1969); Pritchard (1956).

  4. For a general sociological statement on the nature and function of religious symbols see Kokosalakis (2001)

  5. In the Eastern Orthodox Church icons are windows to the sacred and represent it anthropomorphically in condensed pictorial form. They are non-verbal carriers of essential Christian theology (Kokosalakis 1995).

  6. See for example Lipset (1960), Shils (1975), Foucault (1980), among others. For the relation of religion and political power see some interesting articles in Benavides (1989).

  7. God’s omnipotence is stated in the first article of the Nicene Creed: ‘I believe in one God the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth and all things visible and invisible.’ It is also stated in the concluding statement of the Lord’s Prayer: ‘For Thine is the Kingdom the power and the Glory of the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit, now and for ever and into the ages of ages.’

  8. See my review of these books Kokosalakis (2013; 2015).

  9. 11 Here, Martin (1980:177-204) discusses further the similarities and differences between the Christian and the Marxist paradigm. The concept of martyrdom, for instance, is common to both but there is a diametrically opposed interpretation of it by each. Martin further shows how freedom of conscience and individual freedom generally is allowed and sustained in the former and curtailed or abolished in the latter(p.186).

Further Reading

  • Benavides, G. 1989. In M. Daly (Ed.), Religion and Political Power. New York: State of New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolgin, J., Kemnitzer, S., & Schneuder, D. (Eds.) 1979. Symbolic Anthropology: A Reader in the Study of Symbols and Meanings. New York:Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. 1970. Natural Symbols. London:The Cresset Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D. D. 1969. Symbols and Social Theory. New York:Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. N. (Ed.) 1986. The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilization. New York:State of New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. N. 2000. Multiple Modernities. Daedalus, 121(1), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliade, M. 1959. The Sacred and the Profane. New York:Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, R. 1973. Symbols: Public and Private. London:Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and other writings 1972-1977. London:Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York:Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. 1975. The Interpretation of Cultures. London:Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E. 1992. Postmodernism Reason and Religion. London:Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. London:MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hasenclever, A. 2018. ‘Taking Religion Back Out’ in Joas, H. (ed.).

  • Joas, H. (Ed.) 2018. David Martin and the Sociology of Religion. London and New York, Routledge.

  • Kokosalakis, N. 1985. Legitimation, Power and Religion in Modern Society. Sociological Analysis, 46(4), 367–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokosalakis, N. 1995. Icons and non-verbal Religion in the Orthodox Tradition. Social Compass, 42(4), 433–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokosalakis, N. 2001. ‘Symbolism (religious) and Icon’. in International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioural Sciences. Amsterdam. Eslevier.

  • Kokosalakis, N. 2013. Review (Martin, D., The Future of Christianity: Reflections on Violence and Democracy Religion and Secularization). Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(1), 197–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokosalakis, N. 2015. Review (Martin, D., Religion and Power: No Logos without Mythos). In Journal of Contemporary Religion, 30(3), 526–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, E. 1976. Culture and Communication: The Logic by which Symbols Connected. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. 1960. Political Man. New York. Doubleday and company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. 1965. Towards Eliminating the Concept of Secularization. In J. Gould (Ed.), Penguin Survey of Social Sciences (pp. 168–182). Penguin: Hardworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. 1978. A General Theory of Secularization. Oxford:Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. 1980. The Breaking of the Image. Oxford:Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. 2011. The Future of Christianity: Reflections on Violence and Democracy, Religion and Secularization. Farnham:Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. 2013. The Education of David Martin: The Making of an Unlikely Sociologist. London:SPCK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. 2014. Religion and Power: No Logos without Mythos. Farnham:Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. 2018. ‘Thinking with your Life’, in Joas, H. (ed.), pp. 162-190.

  • Niebuhr, R. 1932. Moral Man and Immoral Society. New York:Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R, 1944. The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, R. 1953. Das Helige. (The Idea of the Holy) (Transl. Harvey J.). London, Oxford University Press.

  • Pritchard, E. 1956. Nuer Religion. Oxford:Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shils, E. 1975. Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology. Chicago and London:University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. 1975. Rethinking Symbolism. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. 1967. The Forest of Symbols. Ithaca, N.Y. Cornell.

  • Turner, V. 1969. The Ritual Process. New York:Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gennep, A. 1960. The Rites of Passage. London:Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1948. The social Psychology of the World Religions’; ‘Religious Rejection of the World and their Directions. In H. Gerth, & C. Wright Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford and New York. Oxford University Press.

  • Weber, M. 1968. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London:Unwin University Book.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikos Kokosalakis.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kokosalakis, N. Symbolism and Power in David Martin’s Sociology of Religion. Soc 57, 173–179 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-020-00462-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-020-00462-x

Keywords

Navigation