Skip to main content
Log in

Human Nature and Good Lives: Etzioni’s Elisions

  • Symposium: Understanding Happiness
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In “Happiness Is the Wrong Metric,” Amitai Etzioni argues against the self-satisfier conception of human nature: the view that humans are exclusively motivated by a pursuit of their happiness, where happiness is defined in terms of their satisfactions. The self-satisfier conception is reductionistic and harmful in thinking about good lives, good societies, and sound social policy. In its place Etzioni recommends a moral-wrestler conception of human nature that highlights the pursuit of moral values, especially duties to promote the common good, highlighted in his communitarian ethics, along with the pursuit of happiness. Unfortunately, his dichotomy between the self-satisfier and moral-wrestler conceptions is itself reductionistic. The moral-wrester conception needs to be broadened into a value-seeker (and value-wrestler) conception of human nature that takes seriously non-moral values, widens morality to include virtues as well as duties, and adopts a more plausible view of happiness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Further Reading

  • Aristotle 1985. Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Terence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

  • Batson, C. D. 1991. The Altruism Question: Toward a Social-Psychological Answer. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. 2005. The Cultural Animal: Human Nature, Meaning, and Social Life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bortolotti, L. (Ed.). 2009. Philosophy and Happiness. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1964 [1726]. Fifteen Sermons. London: G. Bell and Sons.

  • Delle Fave, A. (Ed.). 2013. The Exploration of Happiness: Present and Future Perspectives. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doris, J. M. 2002. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. 2016. Happiness Is the Wrong Metric. Society, 53(2).

  • Flanagan, O. 1991. Varieties of Moral Personality: Ethics and Psychological Realism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P. 1978. Virtues and Vices. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. 1976. The Affluent Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haybron, D. M. 2008. The Pursuit of Unhappiness: The Elusive Psychology of Well-Being. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, R. 1999. On Virtue Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1996. Practical Philosophy, trans. M. J. Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavka, G. S. 1986. Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavka, G. S. 1996. The Reconciliation Project. In F. Joel (Ed.), Reason and Responsibility (pp. 623–636). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R. 2005. Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 2007. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. W. 2012. Happiness and the Good Life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. W. 2016. Memoir Ethics: Good Lives and the Virtues. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. 1995. Beast and Man: The Roots of Human Nature. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. 1979 [1861]. Utilitarianism. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

  • Mill, J. S. 1989 [1873]. Autobiography. New York: Penguin Books.

  • Nussbaum, M. C. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. 1995. How Are We to Live?: Ethics in an Age of Self-Interest. Amherst: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike W. Martin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin, M.W. Human Nature and Good Lives: Etzioni’s Elisions. Soc 53, 258–263 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-016-0009-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-016-0009-5

Keywords

Navigation