Abstract
While great improvements have been made in women’s professional advancement in sociology, it is contended that enormous sexism remains in sociological theory books, and the courses (often compulsory) associated with them. This has a broad effect in all fields within sociology, giving students the impression that men are the sources (the only in earlier times). Women are included only late, in contemporary sociology and gender studies. Classical theory textbooks in use over the last 25 years were examined, some in many editions. The trend has been for women to be added in later editions, but with scant or no discussion of their views or comparison with those of men theorists. Well-known women may be included (Rosa Parks, Hilary Clinton) who are not theorists at all! Yet an adequate literature has been available for many years-books by women theorists and analyses of them by reputable scholars. Two tables are provided: one, a chronological list of these works (to dispel the excuse of lack of material), the second (alphabetical), of sexist classical theory textbooks. Finally, it is argued that this is a challenge for the profession itself, authors, publishers, and peer reviewers. Inclusion and competence are both called for.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, B. N., & Sydie, R. A. (2002). Classical sociological theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Addams, J., & Balch, E. G. (1927). The Hopes we Inherit. In Building International Goodwill. New York: Macmillan.
Alatas, S. F., & Sinha, V. (2017). Sociological theory beyond the canon. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Alexander, J. (Ed.). (2001). Mainstream and critical social theory: Classical, modern and contemporary (Vol. 8). London: Sage.
Allan, K. (2005). Explorations in classical sociological theory: Seeing the social world. Thousand Oaks: Fine Forge Press.
Allan, K., & Daynes, S. (2016). Explorations in classical sociological theory: Seeing the social world (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Astell, M. (1694, 1701). A Serious Proposal to the Ladies, for the Advancement of Their True and Greatest Interest. Source Book reprint of London: J.R.
Astell, M. (1705). The Christian religion. London: Wilkins.
Benson, L., et al. (2017). Knowledge for social change: Bacon, Dewey and the revolutionary transformation of research universities in the twenty-first century. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Bentham, J. (1789). Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: Payne & Son.
Bratton, J., & Denham, D. (2014). Capitalism and classical social theory (2nd ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Bratton, J., Denham, D., & Deutschmann, L. (2009). Capitalism and classical social theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Burke, E. (1790). Reflections on the revolution in France. London: J. Dodsley.
Calhoun, C. J. (2007). Classical sociological theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Camic, C. (Ed.). (1998). Reclaiming the sociological classics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Craib, I. (1997). Classical social theory: An Introduction to the thought of Marx, weber, Durkheim and Simmel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
de Staël, G. (1820–21). Oeuvres complètes (Vol. 17). Paris: Treuttel & Würtz.
de Staël, G. (1906, 1979). Des circonstances actuelles qui peuvent terminer la Révolution et des principes qui doivent fonder la République en France. Paris: Fischbacher 1906.
de Staël, G. (1918). Unpublished Correspondence of Mme. de Staël with Thomas Jefferson. Translated by Marie G. Kimball. North American Review, 108(752), 63–71.
Deegan, M. J. (1988). Jane Addams and the men of the Chicago school. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Deegan, M. J. (Ed.). (1991). Women in sociology: A bio-bibliographical sourcebook. New York: Greenwood Press.
Deegan, M. J. (2002). Race, Hull-house and the University of Chicago: A new science against ancient evils. Westport: Praeger.
Deegan, M. J. (2014). Annie Marion MacLean and the Chicago schools of sociology, 1894–1934. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Delaney, T. (2014). Classical and contemporary social theory: Investigation and application. London: Routledge.
Durkheim, E. (1895, 1938). Rule of Sociological Method. Translated by Sarah A. Solway & John H. Mueller. New York: Free Press.
Fontana, B. (2016). Germaine de Staël: A Political Portrait. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hill, B. (Ed.). (1986). Mary Astell (1668–1731): First English feminist: Reflections upon marriage and other writings. Aldershot: Gower/Maurice Temple Smith 1986 New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Hill, B. (1992). Republican virago. The life and times of Catharine Macaulay, historian. Oxford: Clarendon.
Hill, M. R., & Hoecker-Drysdale, S. (Eds.). (2001). Harriet Martineau: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Hoecker-Drysdale, S. (1992). Harriet Martineau: First woman sociologist. Oxford: Berg.
Kandal, T. R. (1998). Woman question in classical sociological theory. Miami: Florida International University Press.
Kimmel, M. S., & Mahler, M. (1998, 2007). Classical Sociological Theory. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kolbrener, W., & Michelson, M. (Eds.). (2007). Mary Astell: Reason, gender, faith. London: Ashgate.
Kosambi, M. (2000). Pandita Ramabai, Through Her Own Words (trans: Kosambi, M.). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Lengermann, P. M., & Niebrugge-Brantley, J. (1998). The women founders: Sociology and social theory, 1830–1930: A text/reader. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
Locke, J. (1690, 1959). An Essay concerning Human Understanding (Vol. 2). New York: Dover.
Longhofer, W., & Winchester, D. (Eds.). (2017). Social theory re-wired: New connections to classical and contemporary perspectives. New York: Routlege.
Macaulay, C. (1767). Loose remarks on Hobbes's philosophical rudiments of government and society: With a short sketch of a Democratical form of government in a letter to Signior Paoli. London: Davies.
Macaulay, C. (1775). An address to the people of England, Scotland, and Ireland. Bath: Cruttwell.
Macaulay, C. (1790, 1974). Letters on Education: With Observations on Religious and Metaphysical Subjects. New York: Garland.
Macpherson, C. B. (1962). The political theory of possessive individualism. Oxford: Clarendon.
Martineau, H. (1836). Miscellanies (Vol. 2). Boston: Hilliard, Gray.
Martineau, H. (1837, 2017). In S. M. Lipset (Ed.), Society in America. New York: Routledge.
Martineau, H. (1838a, 1999). How to Observe Morals and Manners. In M. R. Hill (Ed.). New Brunswick: Transaction.
Martineau, H. (1838b). The martyr age of the United States. London and Westminster Review 32(1), 1–44.
Martineau, Harriet. 1864. The Negro race in America. Edinburgh Review 119(253) (Jan.) 203–42.
McDonald, L. (1993). The early origins of the social sciences. Montréal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
McDonald, L. (1994). Women founders of the social sciences. Montreal: McGill Queen’s University Press.
McDonald, L. (Ed.) (1998). Women Theorists on Society and Politics. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
McDonald, L. (2001). Florence nightingale and the early origins of evidence-based nursing. Evidence-Based Nursing, 4(3), 68–69.
McDonald, L. (Ed.). (2004). Florence nightingale on public health care. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Okin, S. M. (1979). Women in Western political thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Perry, R. (1986). The celebrated Mary Astell: An early English feminist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Raison, T. (1969). Founding fathers of social science. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Ritzer, G. (2003). Contemporary sociological theory and its classical roots: The basics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Ritzer, G., & Stepnisky, J. (Eds.). (2007, 2011). Wiley-Blackwell companion to major social theorists. Winchester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ritzer, G., & Goodman, D. J. (2017). Sociological theory (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Romano, M. A. (Ed.). (2003). Lost sociologists rediscovered: Jane Addams, Walter Benjamin, W.E. DuBois, Harriet Martineau, Pitirim a. Sorokin, Flora Tristan George E. Vincent, and Beatrice Webb. Lewiston: Mellen Studies in Sociology.
Rossi, A. S. (1973). The first woman sociologist: Harriet Martineau (1802-1876). In Rossi (Ed.), The feminist papers. From Adams to Beauvoir. New York: Columbia University Press.
Royce, E. (2015). Classical social theory and modern society: Marx, Durkheim and weber. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Schliesser, E. (Ed.). (2016). Ten neglected classics of philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scott, J. (Ed.). (2007). Fifty key sociologists: The formative theorists. New York: Routledge.
Sydie, R. A. (1987). Natural women, cultured men: A feminist perspective on sociological theory. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Tocqueville, A. (1835, 1945). Democracy in America. Translated by Henry Reeve (Vol. 2). New York: Knopf.
Tucker, K. H., Jr. (2002). Classical social theory: A contemporary approach. Malden: Blackwell.
Turner, J. H. (2014). Theoretical sociology: A concise Introduction to twelve sociological theories. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Vallée, G. (Ed.). (2006). Florence nightingale on health in India. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Vallée, G. (Ed.). (2007). Florence nightingale on social change in India. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Webb, R. K. (1960). Harriet Martineau: Radical Victorian. London: Heinemann.
Wollstonecraft, M. (1790, 1792, 1995). In S. Tomaselli (Ed.), A Vindication of the Rights of Men and A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wollstonecraft, M. (1794, 1795). A Historical and Moral View of the Origin and Progress of the French Revolution. London: J. Johnson.
Zeitlin, I. M. (1968, 2001). Ideology and the Development of Sociological Theory. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDonald, L. Sociological Theory: the Last Bastion of Sexism in Sociology. Am Soc 50, 402–413 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-019-9410-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-019-9410-z