Abstract
Publishing is changing rapidly, though these changes are concealed from academics, who are presented the appearances of the old world of print. The economic incentives and consequently the strategies of publishers have, however, changed. Where quality was once the road to profit, content now is, and novel digital delivery systems are the key to sales. Academic libraries have become storefronts for digital sales. Editors have become content collectors. At the same time publishing has attempted to mimic the accessibility of the web, shrinking the gap between “publication” and posting. This raises the question of what value is added by journal publication, and whether there is a justification for the huge cost. Some shorter and longer term perspectives suggest that the current value-added is linked to policies of evaluation, but that these may change.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
SCOAP3 -- Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access Publishing in Particle Physics http://scoap3.org/what-is-scoap3 (accessed 4 August 2015)
The Cost of Knowledge. http://thecostofknowledge.com/ (accessed 4 August 2015)
References
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. (2001). Writing from sociology’s periphery. In C. Stephen (Ed.), What’s wrong with sociology? (pp. 341–372). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Jump, Paul. (2014). University of Montreal Cancels Wiley-Blackwell Deal Subscription: Cost-Conscious Institution Rejects Publisher’s ‘Big Deal’ on More Than 1,000 Journals. Times Higher Education January 30. https://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/university-of-montreal-cancels-wiley-blackwell-deal-subscription/2010888.article (accessed 4 August 2015).
Jump, Paul. (2015). Elsevier Journal Editors ‘May Be Asked To Resign’ In Open Access Row: Institutions Pressure Elsevier to Permit All Dutch Papers to Be Freely Available Online By 2024. Times Higher Education July 3. https://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/elsevier-journal-editors-‘may-be-asked-resign’-open-access-row (accessed 4 August 2015).
King, DW,. & Montgomery, CH. (2002). After Migration to an Electronic Journal Collection: Impact on Faculty and Doctoral Students. D-Lib Magazine 8(12). doi:10.1045/december2002-king. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december02/king/12king.html (accessed 27 July 2015).
Lichtenberg, J. (2014). Big Data: Should Publishers even Care. Publishers Weekly, May 2. http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/publisher-news/article/62114-big-data-should-publishers-even-care.html (accessed 4 August 2015).
Montgomery, CH., & King, DW. (2002). Comparing library and user related costs of print and electronic journal collections: A first step towards a comprehensive analysis. D-Lib Magazine 8(10). doi:10.1045/october2002-Montgomery http://dlib.org/dlib/october02/montgomery/10montgomery.html (accessed 27 July 2015).
National Research Council. (2003). Assessing research-doctorate programs: A methodology study. Washington, DC: The National Research Council National Academy of Science.
University of California Libraries. (2004). Collection management strategies in a digital environment. Oakland, CA: University of California Department of Academic Initiatives. http://www.ucop.edu/cmi/finalreport/index.html (accessed 27 July 2015).
Van Noorden, R. (2013). The true cost of science publishing. Nature 495:426–429. http://www.nature.com/news/open-access-the-true-cost-of-science-publishing-1.12676 (accessed 27 July 2015).
Vena, M. (2014). Big Data: Dispelling the Myths about One of Publishing’s Hottest Buzzwords. Digital Book World, October 16. http://www.digitalbookworld.com/2014/big-data-dispelling-the-myths-about-one-of-publishings-hottest-buzzwords/ (accessed 4 August 2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turner, S. From the Gutenberg Galaxy to the Digital Clouds. Am Soc 47, 131–138 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9282-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9282-9