Abstract
Recent revisionist scholarship on the history of sociology suggests that women scholars in the pre-World War II era made distinctive contributions to the development of the field of sociology. Most research, however, has focused on women prominent in their era, whose works might or might not be typical of all women who published during the same periods. Furthermore, few studies have made explicit comparisons between works by women and by men writing in this same era, so it has been difficult to sort out gender effects from historical era effects. This study explores writings by women and men in the first volumes of the American Journal of Sociology, from 1895 through 1940. As the oldest continuously published sociology journal in the U.S., AJS played a central role in the development of American sociology. We find that women authors were present in AJS from the earliest days, though their share of authorships never was large, and fluctuated year by year. Women’s work was distinctively different from that of men, with more women than men writing empirical, evidence-based articles, focusing on women, children, immigrants, the poor, and other have-not groups, and advocating for social reform. Writings of rank-and-file and prominent women sociologists were similar in methods, content, and form, and their distinctive contributions to sociology paralleled many of the concerns of feminist sociologists today.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, Andrew. 1999. Department and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Abbott, Grace. 1915. The Midwife in Chicago. American Journal of Sociology. 20 (5): 684–699.
Addams, Jane. 1895. A Belated Industry. American Journal of Sociology 1 (5): 536–50.
Auten, Nellie Mason. 1901. Some Phases of the Sweating System in the Garment Trades of Chicago. American Journal of Sociology 6 (5): 602–645.
Baca Zinn, Maxine, Lynn Weber Cannon, Elizabeth Higginbotham, and Bonnie Thornton Dill. 1990. The Costs of Exclusionary Practices in Women’s Studies. In Making Face, Making Soul: Creative and Critical Perspectives by Feminists of Color, edited by Gloria Anzaldua, 29–41. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
Beiden, Evelina. 1915. The Boy’s Court of Chicago: A Record of Six Months’ Work. American Journal of Sociology 20 (6): 731–744.
Best, Joel. 2001. Giving It Away: Ironies of the Sociology’s Place in Academia. American Sociologist 32 (1): 107–113.
Blauvelt, Mary Taylor. 1901. The Race Problem As Discussed by Negro Women. American Journal of Sociology 6 (5): 662–672.
Bond, Horace Mann. 1931. Two Racial Islands in Alabama. American Journal of Sociology 36 (4): 552–567.
Breckenridge, Sophonisba, and Edith Abbott. 1911. Chicago Housing Conditions, V: South Chicago at the Gates of the Steel Mills. American Journal of Sociology 17 (2): 145–176.
Buckley, Edmund. 1905. The Japanese as Peers of Western Peoples. American Journal ofSociology 11 (3): 326–335.
Cancian, Francesca. 1993. Reply to Risman, Sprague, and Howard. Gender & Society 7 (4): 610–611.
—. 1992. Feminist Science: Methodologies that Challenge Inequality. Gender & Society 6: 623–42.
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Deegan, Mary Jo, ed. 1991. Women in Sociology: A Bibliographical Sourcebook. New York: Greenwood Press.
— 1988a. Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892-1918. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
—. 1988b. Transcending a Patriarchal Past: Teaching the History of Women in Sociology. Teaching Sociology 16 (2): 141–150.
Deegan, Mary Jo and Michael Hill, eds. 1987. Women and Symbolic Interaction. Boston: Allen & Unwinm.
Douglas, Dorothy W. 1930. The Social Purpose in the Sociology of Degreef. American Journal of Sociology 31 (4): 433–454.
Eaves, Lucile. 1920. Plans for Co-operative Research. American Journal of Sociology 25 (5): 568–571.
Fenton Frances. 1910. The Influence of Newspaper Presentations Upon the Growth of Crime and Other Anti-Social Activity Part IV: Methods Used in the Study. American Journal of Sociology 26 (3): 538–564.
Fitzgerald, Ellen. 1990. The Endless Crusade: Women Social Scientists and Progressive Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fonow, Mary Margaret and Judith Cook, eds. 1991. Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Re-search. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Giddings, Paula. 1984. Where and When I Enter: The Impact of Black Women on Race and Sex in America. New York: Morrow.
Goldmark, Josephine C. 1905. The Necessary Sequel of Child-Labor Laws. American Journal of Sociology 11 (3): 312–325.
Goodsell, Willystine. 1936. The Size of Families of College and Non-College Women. American Journal of Sociology 41: 585–97.
Grant, Linda, and Kathryn B. Ward. 1991. Gender and Publishing in Sociology. Gender & Society 5: 207–23.
Grant, Linda, Kathryn B. Ward, and Xue Lan Rong. 1987. Is There a Relationship between Gender and Methods in Published Sociological Research? American Sociological Review 52: 856–62.
Hewes, Amy. 1899. Seminar Notes: Social Institutions and the Riemann Surface. American Journal of Sociology 5 (3): 392–403.
Hill, Michael R., and Susan Hoecker-Drysdale. 2001. Harriet Martineau: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Hughes, Helen Magill. 1973. Maid of All Work or Departmental Sister-in-Law: The Faculty Wife Employed on Campus. American Journal of Sociology 78: 767–72.
Key, V. O. Jr. Police Graft. 1935. American Journal of Sociology 40 (5): 624–636.
Kramarae, Chéris, and Dale Spender, eds. 1992. The Knowledge Explosion: Generations of Feminist Scholarship. New York: Teachers College Press, Athene Series.
Lengermann, Patricia Maadoo, and Jill Niebrugge-Brantley. 1998. The Women Founders: Sociology and Social Theory, 1830-1930. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lutz, Catherine. 1990. The Erasure of Women’s Writings in Sociocultural Anthropology. American Ethnologist 17: 611–27.
Mareck, Jeanne, and Rachel T. Hare-Mustin. 1991. A Short History of the Future: Feminism and Clinical Psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly 15: 521–536.
Margold, Charles W. 1926a. The Need of a Sociological Approach to Problems of Sex Conduct I: Radical Practices Cannot Be Justified by Merely Biological. American Journal of Sociology 31 (5): 455–473.
— 1926b. The Need for a Sociological Approach to Problems of Sex Conduct III: The Invariable Presence of Social Control in Man’s Sexual Conduct. American Journal of Sociology 31 (5): 634–656.
Mead, Margaret. 1926. The Methodology of Racial Testing: Its Significance for Sociology.” 31 (5): 657–667.
Murray, Stephen O. 1988. The Reception of Anthropological Work in Sociology Journals, 1922-1951. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 24: 135–51.
Nichols, Lawrence T. 1992. The Establishment of Sociology at Harvard: A Case of Organizational Ambiva-lence and Scientific Vulnerability. In Science at Harvard University: Historical Perspectives, edited by Clark A. Elliott and Margaret W. Rossiter, 191–222. Bethlehem, Pa.: Lehigh University Press.
— 1997. Sociology in the Women’s Annex: Inequality and Integration at Harvard and Radcliffe, 1879-1947. The American Sociologist 28 (3): 5–28.
Nielsen, Joyce McCarl. 1990. Feminist Research Methods: Exemplary Readings in the Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
O’Connell, Agnes N., and Nancy Felipe Russo, eds. 1991. Women’s Heritage in Psychology: Origins, Devel-opment and Future Directions. Special Issue of Psychology of Women Quarterly 15 (4).
Park, Robert E. 1929. Urbanization as Measured by Newspaper Circulation. American Journal of Sociology 35 (1): 60–79. (Change in text so dates match)
Platt, Jennifer. 1994. The Chicago School and Firsthand Data. History of the Human Sciences. 7 (1): 57–80.
—. 1983. The Development of the “Participant Observation” Method in Sociology: Origin Myth and History. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 19: 379–93.
Reinharz, Shulamit. 1992a. Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford.
—. 1989a. Finding Her Sociological Voice: The Work of Mirra Komarovsky. Sociological Inquiry 59: 374–95.
—. 1989b. Teaching the History of Women in Sociology: Or Dorothy Swaine Thomas, Wasn’t She the Woman Married to William I? American Sociologist 20: 87–94.
—. 1992b. The Principles of Feminist Research: A Matter of Debate. In The Knowledge Explosion, edited by Cheris Kramarae and Dale Spender, 423–35. New York: Teachers College Press, Athene Series.
Risman, Barbara J., Joey Sprague, and Judy Howard. 1993. Comment on Francesca M. Cancian’s “Feminist Science.” Gender & Society 7 (4): 608–609.
Roberts, Helen, ed. 1981. Doing Feminist Research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Robinson, Edgar Eugene. 1914. Decline of the Democratic Party. American Journal of Sociology 20 (3): 313–334.
Roby, Pamela. 1992. Women and the ASA: Degendering Organizational Structures and Processes, 1964-74. American Sociologist 23: 18–48.
Roos, Patricia A. 1997. Occupational Feminization, Occupational Decline? Sociology’s Changing Sex Composition. The American Sociologist 28 (1): 75–88.
Rosenberg, Rosalind. 1982. Beyond Separate Spheres. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rossiter, Margaret. 1982. Women Scientists in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sandoval, Chela. 1990. Feminism and Racism: A Report on the 1981 National Women’s Studies Association Conference. In Making Face, Making Soul: Creative and Critical Perspectives by Feminists of Color, edited by Gloria Anzaldua, 55–74. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books,.
Scarborough, Elizabeth, and Laurel Furumoto. 1987. Untold Stories: the First Generation of American Women Psychologists. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schechter, Patricia A. 2001. Ida B. Wells-Barnett and American Reform, 1880-1930. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Simmel, Georg. 1910. How is Society Possible? American Journal of Sociology 16 (3): 372–391.
Small, Albion. 1915. The Bonds of Nationality. American Journal of Sociology 20 (5): 629–683.
Smith, Barbara. 1990. Racism and Women’s Studies. In Making Face, Making Soul: Creative and Critical Perspectives by Feminists of Color, edited by Gloria Anzaldua, 25–28. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
Stacey, Judith, and Barrie Thorne. 1985. The Missing Feminist Revolution in Sociology. Social Problems.
Stanley, Liz, ed. 1990. Feminist Praxis: Research, Theory and Epistemology in Feminist Sociology. London: Routledge.
— 1992. The Impact of Feminism on Sociology in the Last 20 Years. In The Knowledge Explosion, edited by Cheris Kramarae and Dale Spender, 254–69. New York: Teachers’ College Press, Athene Series.
Stanley, Liz, and Sue Wise. 1983. Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. London: Routledge.
Travis, C., D. Gressley, and C. Crumpler. 1991. Feminist Contributions to Health Psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly 15: 557–66.
Uttal, Lynet. 1990. Inclusion Without Influence: The Continuing Tokenism of Women of Color. In Making Face, Making Soul: Creative and Critical Perspectives by Feminists of Color, edited by Gloria Anzaldua, 42–45. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
Walker, Natalie. 1915. Chicago Housing Conditions and Greeks and Italians in the Neighborhood of Hull House. American Journal of Sociology 21: 285–306.
Ward, Kathryn B., and Linda Grant. 1991a. Coauthorship, Gender, and Publication among Sociologists. In Beyond Methodology: Feminist Research as Lived Experience, edited by Mary Margaret Fonow and Judith Cook. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
—. 1991b. On a Wavelength of Their Own? Women and Sociological Theory. Current Perspectives in Social Theory 11: 117–40.
—. 1985. The Feminist Critique and a Decade of Research in Sociology Journals. Sociological Quarterly 26: 139–57.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We acknowledge the research assistance of Dana Bottenfield in the preparation of this manuscript.
We appreciate comments by Lawrence T. Nichols on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grant, L., Stalp, M.C. & Ward, K.B. Women’s sociological research and writing in the AJS in the pre-World War II era. Am Soc 33, 69–91 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-002-1012-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-002-1012-4