Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of Reference Values for External Genitalia Parameters in North Indian Preterm and Term Female Newborns

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To establish gestation-wise normative data of external genitalia measurements in North Indian term and preterm female newborns.

Methods

In this cross-sectional descriptive study, institutionally-born female neonates between 28-42 wk gestation were consecutively enrolled between 24-72 h of life. Newborns with major congenital malformations, chromosomal anomalies, multifetal gestation and birth injuries were excluded. Data on various genital measurements were collected [Clitoral length (CL), clitoral width (CW), ano-clitoral distance (AGDAC), ano-fourchette distance (AGDAF) and anogenital ratio (AGR)].

Results

One hundred ninety-eight of 508 neonates (39%) were preterm and 310 (61%) were term. Mean (± SD) CL and CW were 4.6 ± 1.8 mm and 3.9 ± 1.6 mm, respectively. Mean (± SD) values for AGDAF, AGDAC and AGR were 9.3 ± 1.8 mm, 30.2 ± 3.9 mm, and 0.31 ± 0.05, respectively. According to these results, term female newborns with CL more than 7 mm and/or CW more than 6 mm (95th centile) warrant evaluation for clitoromegaly. An anogenital ratio greater than 0.45 should be considered as a sign of virilization in a female neonate. Gestation-wise percentile charts for CL, CW, AGDAF, AGDAC and AGR were generated.

Conclusions

The percentile values defined in the study can serve as local normative data for accurate interpretation of genital measurements in North Indian female newborns and enable health care professionals for early identification of genital virilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mondal R, Chatterjee K, Samanta M, et al. Clitoral length and anogenital ratio in indian newborn girls. Indian Pediatr. 2016;53:299–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jarrett OO, Ayoola OO, Jonsson B, Albertsson-Wikland K, Ritzen M. Country-based reference values and international comparisons of clitoral size in healthy nigerian newborn infants. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104:1286–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Asafo-Agyei SB, Ameyaw E, Chanoine J-P, Zacharin M, Nguah SB. Clitoral size in term newborns in Kumasi, Ghana. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol. 2017;2017:6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Castets S, Nguyen KA, Plaisant F, et al. Reference values for the external genitalia of full-term and pre-term female neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021;106:39–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alaei M, Rohani F, Norouzi E, et al. The nomogram of clitoral length and width in iranian term and preterm neonates. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Badawy M, Fawaz LA, Abd El Baky H, Elkhashab A, Hussein AA, Mira MF. Reference values for penile and clitoral lengths of healthy term egyptian newborn infants. J Paediatr Child Health. 2022;58:157–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kutlu HA, Akbiyik F. Clitoral length in female newborns: a new approach to the assessment of clitoromegaly. Turk J Med Sci. 2011;41:495–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Priskorn L, Petersen JH, Jørgensen N, et al. Anogenital distance as a phenotypic signature through infancy. Pediatr Res. 2018;83:573–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jain VG, Goyal V, Chowdhary V, et al. Anogenital distance is determined during early gestation in humans. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1619–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Callegari C, Everett S, Ross M, Brasel JA. Anogenital ratio: measure of fetal virilization in premature and full-term newborn infants. J Pediatr. 1987;111:240–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozkan B, Konak B, Cayır A, Konak M. Anogenital distance in Turkish newborns. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2011;3:122–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K, Wang L, Eilers-Walsman BL, Lipp R. New Ballard score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 1991;119:417–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sathyanarayana S, Grady R, Redmon JB, et al. Anogenital distance and penile width measurements in the infant development and the environment study (TIDES): methods and predictors. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11:76.e1-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Adekoya AO, Fetuga MB, Jarrett OO, Ogunlesi TA, Chanoine JP, Adekoya AO. Clitoral sizes and anogenital distances in term newborns in Nigeria. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol. 2019;2019:5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta M, Chambers C, O’Flynn O’Brien K. Clitoromegaly in premature infants: is it truly pathologic? Acad J Pediatr Neonatol. 2021;10:555843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sathyanarayana S, Beard L, Zhou C, Grady R. Measurement and correlates of anogenital distance in healthy, newborn infants. Int J Androl. 2010;33:317–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cao W, Ding X, Dong Z, Tang H. Reference values for and correlation analysis of the anogenital distance of chinese Han full-term singleton neonates. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:905421.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Asafo-Agyei SB, Ameyaw E, Chanoine JP, Zacharin M, Nguah SB, Jarrett OO. Anogenital distance in term newborns in Kumasi, Ghana. Horm Res Paediatr. 2017;88:396–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Numsriskulrat N, Srilanchakon K, Pronprechatham C, Pornkunwilai S, Supornsilchai V. Sex-specific ranges and ratios for anogenital distance among thai full-term newborns. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22:258.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Arbuckle TE, Hauser R, Swan SH, et al. Meeting report: measuring endocrine-sensitive endpoints within the first years of life. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:948–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PMN was primary investigator; PMN and JY were involved in conception of the study and drafting the manuscript; JY, DD, PK, JK, HK and PS were co-investigators, and advisors in study conduct and manuscript revision; DD, RK, PK were involved in revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors have read the manuscript and approved it for final submission. All authors have agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. DD will act as the guarantor for this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaivinder Yadav.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1162 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nanda, P.M., Yadav, J., Dayal, D. et al. Estimation of Reference Values for External Genitalia Parameters in North Indian Preterm and Term Female Newborns. Indian J Pediatr 91, 548–555 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-023-04743-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-023-04743-1

Keywords

Navigation