Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early Interventions for Infants at Risk for Developmental Impairment: The South Asian Perspective

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Majority of under-five children with developmental disabilities live in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). A considerable proportion of disabilities results from perinatal adversities. The neonatal and infant mortality rates in India, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka have improved over the last two decades, implying survival of infants at risk for developmental impairments. The need to thrive beyond survival is a well-recognized concept and it is imperative to establish high-risk infant follow-up (HRIF) programmes to capture these infants within the first 1000 d of life. Many challenges are present within the LMICs to identify infants at risk and to ensure early intervention (EI) during the window of optimal neural plasticity. However, it is essential to acknowledge the strengths within such systems to understand the impact of these programmes and packages on the activity and participation of these infants and their families. The International Classification of Functioning, Health and Disability for Children and Youth (ICF-CY) version is a holistic framework that will enable the families, clinicians, and policymakers to measure the impact of these interventions. Though all three countries have national policies to reach for high-risk infants, there is lack of published evidence on the successful implementation of such strategies. Therefore, it is timely to establish universally accessible, culturally appropriate and sustainable HRIF programmes. It is also recommended to measure the outcomes of such programmes based on the ICF-CY to understand the impact on the activity and participation of children in South Asia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Improving early childhood development: WHO guideline. 2020. Available at: https://www.urban.org/research/publication/improving-early-childhood-development-policies-and-practices. Accessed on 6 April 2021.

  2. Global Research on Developmental Disabilities Collaborators. Developmental disabilities among children younger than 5 years in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1100–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Byrne R, Noritz G, Maitre NL. Implementation of early diagnosis and intervention guidelines for cerebral palsy in a high-risk infant follow-up clinic. Pediatr Neurol. 2017;76:66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Milner KM, Neal EFG, Roberts G, Steer AC, Duke T. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in high-risk newborns in resource-limited settings: A systematic review of the literature. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2015;35:227–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization. Nurturing care for early childhood development: Linking survive and thrive to transform health and human potential. 2018. Available at: https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/child/nurturing-care-framework/en/. Accessed on 6 April 2021.

  6. Pascual-Leone A, Amedi A, Fregni F, Merabet LB. The plastic human brain cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:377–401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan C, Novak I, Dale RC, Guzzetta A, Badawi N. Single blind randomised controlled trial of GAME (Goals - Activity - Motor Enrichment) in infants at high risk of cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2016;55:256–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers SJ, Estes A, Lord C, et al. Effects of a brief early start denver model (ESDM)-based parent intervention on toddlers at risk for autism spectrum disorders: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51:1052–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hutchon B, Gibbs D, Harniess P, et al. Early intervention programmes for infants at high risk of atypical neurodevelopmental outcome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61:1362–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization. ICF-CY International classification of functioning, disability and health. children & youth version. Geneva: WHO Press; 2007. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43737. Accessed on 21 April 2018.

  11. Calder S, Ward R, Jones M, Johnston JCM. The uses of outcome measures within multidisciplinary early childhood intervention services: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:2599–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Islam A, Tahir MZ. Health sector reform in South Asia: new challenges and constraints. Health Policy. 2002;60:151–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peña E, Fiestas C. Talking Across Cultures in Early Intervention: Finding Common Ground to Meet Children’s Communication Needs. Perspect Commun Disord Sci Cult Linguist Divers Popul. 2009;16:79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hadders AM. Challenges and limitations in early intervention. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:52–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rao N, Sun J, Wong JMS, et al. Early childhood development and cognitive development in developing countries: A rigorous literature review. Department Int Dev. 2014;1–100. Available at: http://cerc.edu.hku.hk/wp-content/uploads/ECD-review.pdf. Accessed on 11 April 2021.

  16. Wong V. Global developmental delay – a delay in development of terminology. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. World Health Organization; March of Dimes; The Partnership for Maternal N& CHS the C. Born too soon The global action report on preterm birth. 2012. Available at: https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/born_too_soon/en. Accessed on 3 April 2021.

  18. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Govt of Himachal Pradesh. National Health Mission: Guidelines_RBSK. Available at: http://www.nrhmhp.gov.in/content/guidelinesrbsk. Accessed on 11 April 2021.

  19. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Government of India. Operational Guidelines, Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK): Child Health Screening and Early Intervention Services under NRHM. 2013. http://www.nrhmhp.gov.in/content/guidelinesrbsk. Accessed on 11 April 2021.

  20. Department of Health & Family Welfare Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Government of India. Annual report 2020–21. Available at: https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/Annual%20Report%202020-21%20English.pdf. Accessed on 20 April 2021.

  21. The World Bank. Child mortality estimation. 1960–2019. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.IMRT.IN?locations=IN.Accessed on 25 April 2021.

  22. National Institute of Population Research and Training Medical Education and Family Welfare Division Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Dhaka, Bangladesh. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. 2017–18. Available at: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/PR104/PR104.pdf.Accessed on 12 April 2021.

  23. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4). 2015–16: India. Available at: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR339/FR339.pdf. Accessed on 20 April 2021.

  24. Family Health Bureau, Ministry of Health and Indigenous medicine, Sri Lanka. Annual Report. 2015–18. Available at: http://fhb.health.gov.lk/index.php/en/resources/annual-report. Accessed on 20 April 2021.

  25. Kohli-Lynch M, Tann CJ, Ellis ME. Early intervention for children at high risk of developmental disability in low-and middle-income countries: A narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:4449.

  26. Singh AK, Kumar R, Mishra CK, Khera A, Srivastava A. Moving from survival to healthy survival through Child Health Screening and Early Intervention Services Under Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK). Indian J Pediatr. 2015;82:1012–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khan NZ, Muslima H. Training manual for the establishment of child development and disability services In Bangladesh. 2020. Available at: https://www.bpfbd.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/10-page-1.pdf. Accessed on 13 April 2021.

  28. Family Health Bureau SL. Child development and special need unit (CDSNU). Available at: http://www.fhb.health.gov.lk/index.php/en/technical-units/child-development-specia-needs-unit. Accessed on 20 April 2021.

  29. Avan BI, Rahbar MHRS. The role of family configuration in early childhood intellectual development in the context of an extended family system in Pakistan. J Postgr Med. 2007;53:27–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Srinivasan B, Karlan GR. Culturally responsive early intervention programs: issues in India. Int J Disabil Dev Educ. 1997;44:367–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gulati S, Kaushik JS, Saini L, et al. Development and validation of DSM-5 based diagnostic tool for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0213242.

  32. Zaman SS, Khan NZ, Islam SB, Sultana DS. Validity of the ‘Ten Questions’ for screening serious childhood disability: results from Urban Bangladesh. Int J Epidemiol. 990;19:613–20.

  33. Wijedasa D. Developmental screening in context: adaptation and standardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test-II (DDST-II) for Sri Lankan children. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38:889–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Khandaker G, Muhit M, Karim T, et al. Epidemiology of cerebral palsy in Bangladesh: a population-based surveillance study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61:601–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vaivada T, Gaffey MF, Bhutta ZA. Promoting early child development with interventions in health and nutrition: A systematic review. Pediatrics. 2017;140:e20164308.

  36. Neuman MJ, Okeng’o L. Early childhood policies in low- and middle-income countries. Early Years. 2019;39:223–8.

  37. Novak I, Morgan C, Adde L, et al. Early, accurate diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:897–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fischer VJ, Morris J, Martines J. Developmental screening tools: feasibility of use at primary healthcare level in low- and middle-income settings. J Health Popul Nutr. 2014;32:314–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Østensjø S, Bjorbækmo W, Carlberg EB, Vøllestad NK. Assessment of everyday functioning in young children with disabilities: An ICF-based analysis of concepts and content of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:489–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Srivastava AK, Baipai P. Community-based Rehabilitation: The Indian Perspective. World Fed Occup Ther Bull. 2005;52:39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wickenden M, Hartley S, Kariyakaranawa S, Kodikara S. Teaching speech and language therapists in sri lanka: issues in curriculum, culture and language. folia phoniatr Logop. 2003;55:314–21.

  42. Rahman A, Divan G, Hamdani SU, et al. Effectiveness of the parent-mediated intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder in south Asia in India and Pakistan (PASS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:128–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rosenbaum PL, Silva M, Camden C. Let’s not go back to ‘normal’! lessons from COVID-19 for professionals working in childhood disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43:1022–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Vismara LA, Young GS, Rogers SJ. Telehealth for expanding the reach of early autism training to parents. autism res treat. 2012;2012:121878.

  45. Rosenbaum P, Gorter JW. The ‘F-words’ in childhood disability: I swear this is how we should think! Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38:457–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DV: Sri Lankan perspective, majority of literature review, preparation of figures, planning, and conceptualization; IJ, MS: Conceptualization, Bangaladeshi perspective, editing the manuscript, and literature review; MG, SG, GDC: Conceptualization, Indian perspective, editing the manuscript, and literature review; SPS: Sri Lankan perspective, preparation of the manuscript, literature review, planning, and conceptualization. SPS will act as the guarantor for this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samanmali P. Sumanasena.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vipulaguna, D., Jahan, I., Girish, M. et al. Early Interventions for Infants at Risk for Developmental Impairment: The South Asian Perspective. Indian J Pediatr 89, 254–261 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-021-03871-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-021-03871-w

Keywords

Navigation