Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Newer Diagnostic Tests for Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Children

  • Review Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been well recognized that the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children is often compromised by non-specific symptoms, paucibacillary nature of the disease, and the difficulty in collecting the specimen. Consequently, most tuberculosis cases in children are not confirmed, due to which the estimation of the global burden of tuberculosis in children may be inaccurate. There has also been a common misperception that diagnosis of tuberculosis and collecting respiratory specimen in children is always difficult. Because of this, microbiological confirmation of tuberculosis in young children is not routinely attempted in most endemic areas. With the emergence of HIV-related tuberculosis disease and drug-resistant tuberculosis, the availability of accurate, rapid and child friendly diagnostic tools to identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimen are urgently required in endemic settings. There have been a large number of studies evaluating new diagnostic tests for tuberculosis in the past decade, but few have been evaluated in children. This review will address the developments in respiratory specimen collection and laboratory diagnostic tests of tuberculosis, with a focus on those that have been evaluated in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brigden G, Furin J, Van Gulik C, Marais B. Getting it right for children: improving tuberculosis treatment access and new treatment options. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015;13:451–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marais BJ, Hesseling AC, Gie RP, Schaaf HS, Enarson DA, Beyers N. The bacteriologic yield in children with intrathoracic tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:e69–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pai M, Minion J, Sohn H, Zwerling A, Perkins MD. Novel and improved technologies for tuberculosis diagnosis: progress and challenges. Clin Chest Med. 2009;30:701–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marais BJ, Pai M. New approaches and emerging technologies in the diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2007;8:124–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marais BJ, Pai M. Recent advances in the diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:446–52.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hatherill M, Hawkridge T, Zar HJ, et al. Induced sputum or gastric lavage for community-based diagnosis of childhood pulmonary tuberculosis? Arch Dis Child. 2009;94:195–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zar HJ, Connell TG, Nicol M. Diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children: new advances. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010;8:277–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mukherjee A, Singh S, Lodha R, et al; Delhi Pediatric TB Study Group. Ambulatory gastric lavages provide better yields of Mycobacterium tuberculosis than induced sputum in children with intrathoracic tuberculosis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32:1313–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pitchenik AE, Ganjei P, Torres A, Evans DA, Rubin E, Baier H. Sputum examination for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986;133:226–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zar HJ, Hanslo D, Apolles P, Swingler G, Hussey G. Induced sputum versus gastric lavage for microbiological confirmation of pulmonary tuberculosis in infants and young children: a prospective study. Lancet. 2005;365:130–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruiz Jimenez M, Guillen Martin S, Prieto Tato LM, et al. Induced sputum versus gastric lavage for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:222.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hepple P, Ford N, McNerney R. Microscopy compared to culture for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in induced sputum samples: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16:579–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zar HJ, Tannenbaum E, Apolles P, Roux P, Hanslo D, Hussey G. Sputum induction for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in infants and young children in an urban setting in South Africa. Arch Dis Child. 2000;82:305–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas TA, Heysell SK, Moodley P, et al. Intensified specimen collection to improve tuberculosis diagnosis in children from Rural South Africa, an observational study. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:11.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nicol MP, Zar HJ. New specimens and laboratory diagnostics for childhood pulmonary TB: progress and prospects. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2011;12:16–21.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Franchi LM, Cama RI, Gilman RH, Montenegro-James S, Sheen P. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in nasopharyngeal aspirate samples in children. Lancet. 1998;352:1681–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Owens S, Abdel-Rahman IE, Balyejusa S, et al. Nasopharyngeal aspiration for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:693–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Aghbari N, Al-Sonboli N, Yassin MA, et al. Multiple sampling in one day to optimize smear microscopy in children with tuberculosis in Yemen. PLoS One. 2009;4, e5140.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goussard P, Gie R. The role of bronchoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2014;8:101–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh M, Moosa NV, Kumar L, Sharma M. Role of gastric lavage and broncho-alveolar lavage in the bacteriological diagnosis of childhood pulmonary tuberculosis. Indian Pediatr. 2000;37:947–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Oberhelman RA, Soto-Castellares G, Gilman RH, et al. Diagnostic approaches for paediatric tuberculosis by use of different specimen types, culture methods, and PCR: a prospective case–control study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10:612–20.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oberhelman RA, Soto-Castellares G, Caviedes L, et al. Improved recovery of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from children using the microscopic observation drug susceptibility method. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e100–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gopinath K, Singh S. Urine as an adjunct specimen for the diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13:374–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Heydari AA, Movahhede Danesh MR, Ghazvini K. Urine PCR evaluation to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014;7:e9311.

  25. Andersen P, Munk ME, Pollock JM, Doherty TM. Specific immune-based diagnosis of tuberculosis. Lancet. 2000;356:1099–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun L, Xiao J, Miao Q, et al. Interferon gamma release assay in diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2011;63:165–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mandalakas AM, Detjen AK, Hesseling AC, Benedetti A, Menzies D. Interferon-gamma release assays and childhood tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15:1018–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chiappini E, Accetta G, Bonsignori F, et al. Interferon-gamma release assays for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2012;25:557–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. WHO. Use of Tuberculosis Interferon- Gamma Release Assays (IGRAs) in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Policy Statement,. Geneva, Switzeland: World Health Organization; 2011.

  30. McNerney R, Maeurer M, Abubakar I, et al. Tuberculosis diagnostics and biomarkers: needs, challenges, recent advances, and opportunities. J Infect Dis. 2012;205:S147–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Steingart KR, Ng V, Henry M, et al. Sputum processing methods to improve the sensitivity of smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:664–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Steingart KR, Henry M, Ng V, et al. Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:570–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cambanis A, Yassin MA, Ramsay A, Squire SB, Arbide I, Cuevas LE. A one-day method for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in rural Ethiopia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006;10:230–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Marais BJ, Gie RP, Hesseling AH, Beyers N. Adult-type pulmonary tuberculosis in children 10–14 years of age. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24:743–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Swaminathan S, Rekha B. Pediatric tuberculosis: global overview and challenges. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:S184–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cruciani M, Scarparo C, Malena M, Bosco O, Serpelloni G, Mengoli C. Meta-analysis of BACTEC MGIT 960 and BACTEC 460 TB, with or without solid media, for detection of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:2321–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Brittle W, Marais BJ, Hesseling AC, et al. Improvement in mycobacterial yield and reduced time to detection in pediatric samples by use of a nutrient broth growth supplement. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:1287–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tran ST, Renschler JP, Le HT, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) assay for pediatric tuberculosis in Hanoi, Vietnam. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72100.

  39. Gomez-Pastrana D. Diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children. J Infect Dis Ther. 2013;1:17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  40. El-Hajj HH, Marras SA, Tyagi S, Kramer FR, Alland D. Detection of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a single tube with molecular beacons. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:4131–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Steingart KR, Schiller I, Horne DJ, Pai M, Boehme CC, Dendukuri N. Xpert(R) MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1:Cd009593.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Detjen AK, DiNardo AR, Leyden J, et al. Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Resp Med. 2015;3:451–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lawn SD. Point-of-care detection of lipoarabinomannan (LAM) in urine for diagnosis of HIV-associated tuberculosis: a state of the art review. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:103.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nicol MP, Allen V, Workman L, et al. Urine lipoarabinomannan testing for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children: a prospective study. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e278–84.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Marais BJ. Urine lipoarabinomannan testing in children with tuberculosis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e245–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rina Triasih.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Triasih, R. Newer Diagnostic Tests for Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Children. Indian J Pediatr 82, 827–832 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-015-1848-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-015-1848-6

Keywords

Navigation