Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of liver metastases.
Methods
Patients with up to 5 liver metastases were enrolled in this prospective multicenter study and underwent SBRT. Efficacy outcomes included in-field local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Acute and late toxicities were evaluated using CTCAE v.4.0.
Results
A total of 52 patients with 105 liver metastases were treated between 2015 and 2018. The most common primary tumor was colorectal cancer (72% of cases). Liver metastases were synchronous with the primary tumor diagnosis in 24 patients (46.2%), and 21 patients (40.4%) presented with other extrahepatic oligometastases. All patients underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) and respiratory gating, and a minimum biologically effective dose (BED10Gy) of 100 Gy was delivered to all lesions. With a median follow-up of 23.1 months (range: 13.4–30.9 months) since liver SBRT, the median actuarial local progression-free survival (local-PFS) was not reached. The actuarial in-field LC rates were 84.9% and 78.4% at 24 and 48 months, respectively. The median actuarial liver-PFS and distant-PFS were 11 and 10.8 months, respectively. The actuarial median overall survival (OS) was 27.7 months from SBRT and 52.5 months from metastases diagnosis. Patients with lesion diameter ≤ 5 cm had significantly better median liver-PFS (p = 0.006) and OS (p = 0.018). No acute or late toxicities of grade ≥ 3 were observed.
Conclusions
This prospective multicenter study confirms that liver SBRT is an effective alternative for the treatment of liver metastases, demonstrating high rates of local control and survival while maintaining a low toxicity profile.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data are available at rationale request.
References
DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Siegel RL, Stein KD, Kramer JL, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(4):252–71.
Weichselbaum RR, Hellman S. Oligometastases revisited. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(6):378–82.
Viganò L, Ferrero A, Lo Tesoriere R, Capussotti L. Liver surgery for colorectal metastases: results after 10 years of follow-up. Long-term survivors, late recurrences, and prognostic role of morbidity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(9):2458–64.
Siperstein AE, Berber E, Ballem N, Parikh RT. Survival after radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases: 10-year experience. Ann Surg. 2007;246(4):559–65.
Herfarth KK, Debus J, Lohr F, Bahner ML, Rhein B, Fritz P, et al. Stereotactic single-dose radiation therapy of liver tumors: results of a phase I/II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(1):164–70.
Lee MT, Kim JJ, Dinniwell R, Brierley J, Lockwood G, Wong R, et al. Phase i study of individualized stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(10):1585–91.
Goodman KA, Wiegner EA, Maturen KE, Zhang Z, Mo Q, Yang G, et al. Dose-escalation study of single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78(2):486–93.
Schefter TE, Rusthoven KE, Kavanagh BD, Cardenes H, Stieber VW, Burri SH, et al. Multi-institutional phase I/II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(10):1572–8.
Méndez Romero A, Wunderink W, van Os RM, Nowak PJCM, Heijmen BJM, Nuyttens JJ, et al. Quality of life after stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary and metastatic liver tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(5):1447–52.
Hoyer M, Roed H, Hansen AT, Ohlhuis L, Petersen J, Nellemann H, et al. Phase II study on stereotactic body radiotherapy of colorectal metastases. Acta Oncol. 2006;45(7):823–30.
Scorsetti M, Comito T, Tozzi A, Navarria P, Fogliata A, Clerici E, et al. Final results of a phase II trial for stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with inoperable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015;141(3):545–53.
Scorsetti M, Comito T, Clerici E, Franzese C, Tozzi A, Iftode C, et al. Phase II trial on SBRT for unresectable liver metastases: long-term outcome and prognostic factors of survival after 5 years of follow-up. Radiat Oncol. 2018;13(1):234.
Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, Gaede S, Louie AV, Haasbeek C, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligometastatic cancers: long-term results of the SABR-COMET Phase II randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(25):2830–8.
Cancer Institute N. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (2009).
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.
Joo Hyun O, Lodge MA, Wahl RL. Practical PERCIST: a simplified guide to PET response criteria in solid tumors 1.0. Radiology. 2016;280(2):576–84.
Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, Sobrero A, Van Krieken JH, Aderka D, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2016;27(8):1386–422.
Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, Cortés J, De Azambuja E, Demichele A, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer 5 behalf of the ESMO guidelines committee. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(12):1475–95.
Planchard D, Popat S, Kerr K, Novello S, Smit EF, Faivre-Finn C, et al. Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up †. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:iv192–237.
Benson AB, Al-Hawary MM, Azad N, Chen Y-J, Ciombor KK, Cohen S, et al (2022) NCCN guidelines version 1. colon cancer continue NCCN guidelines panel disclosures. 2022 [cited 2022 Mar 24]; Available from: https://www.nccn.org/home/member-
Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Chair V, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman JR, et al. NCCN guidelines version 32022 non-small cell lung cancer continue NCCN guidelines panel disclosures. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2022;20(5):497–530.
Ambrosino G, Polistina F, Costantin G, Francescon P, Guglielmi R, Zanco P, et al. Image-guided robotic stereotactic radiosurgery for unresectable liver metastases: preliminary results. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(8):3381–4.
Gaede S, Lock MI. Advances in external beam stereotactic body radiotherapy: principle concerns in implementing a liver radiation program. Chin Clin Oncol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.21037/cco.2017.06.25.
Jackson WC, Tao Y, Mendiratta-Lala M, Bazzi L, Wahl DR, Schipper MJ, et al. Comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of intrahepatic metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;100(4):950–8.
Loi M, Desideri I, Dominici L, Francolini G, Garlatti P, Ciccone LP, et al. Thermal ablation versus SBRT in liver tumours: pros and cons. Medi Oncol. 2020;37:52.
Postow MA, Callahan MK, Barker CA, Yamada Y, Yuan J, Kitano S, et al. Immunologic correlates of the abscopal effect in a patient with melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(10):925–31.
Chang DT, Swaminath A, Kozak M, Weintraub J, Koong AC, Kim J, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: a pooled analysis. Cancer. 2011;117(17):4060–9.
Mahadevan A, Blanck O, Lanciano R, Peddada A, Sundararaman S, D’Ambrosio D, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver metastasis—clinical outcomes from the international multi-institutional RSSearch® patient registry. Radiat Oncol. 2018;13(1):26.
Méndez Romero A, Schillemans W, van Os R, Koppe F, Haasbeek CJ, Hendriksen EM, et al. The Dutch-Belgian registry of stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases: clinical outcomes of 515 patients and 668 metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;109(5):1377–86.
Andratschke N, Alheid H, Allgäuer M, Becker G, Blanck O, Boda-Heggemann J, et al. The SBRT database initiative of the German society for radiation oncology (DEGRO): patterns of care and outcome analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver oligometastases in 474 patients with 623 metastases. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):283.
Voglhuber T, Eitz KA, Oechsner M, Vogel MME, Combs SE. Analysis of using high-precision radiotherapy in the treatment of liver metastases regarding toxicity and survival. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08488-y.
Funding
The authors declare no funding or research grants received in the course of study, research or assembly of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The autors declare that there’s no financial/personal interest or belief that could affect their objectivity, or if there is, stating the source and nature of that potential conflict.
Ethical approval
This study is a prospective, multicenter non-randomized clinical trial approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Ethics Committees at the Fundación HM Hospitales (15.04.781-GHM) and Hospital Universitario de Navarra (Pyto2015/99). The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards outlined in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participating subjects before inclusion.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Rodríguez, MC.R., Chen-Zhao, X., Hernando, O. et al. SBRT-SG-01: final results of a prospective multicenter study on stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver metastases. Clin Transl Oncol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03403-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03403-w