Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

SBRT-SG-01: final results of a prospective multicenter study on stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver metastases

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of liver metastases.

Methods

Patients with up to 5 liver metastases were enrolled in this prospective multicenter study and underwent SBRT. Efficacy outcomes included in-field local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Acute and late toxicities were evaluated using CTCAE v.4.0.

Results

A total of 52 patients with 105 liver metastases were treated between 2015 and 2018. The most common primary tumor was colorectal cancer (72% of cases). Liver metastases were synchronous with the primary tumor diagnosis in 24 patients (46.2%), and 21 patients (40.4%) presented with other extrahepatic oligometastases. All patients underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) and respiratory gating, and a minimum biologically effective dose (BED10Gy) of 100 Gy was delivered to all lesions. With a median follow-up of 23.1 months (range: 13.4–30.9 months) since liver SBRT, the median actuarial local progression-free survival (local-PFS) was not reached. The actuarial in-field LC rates were 84.9% and 78.4% at 24 and 48 months, respectively. The median actuarial liver-PFS and distant-PFS were 11 and 10.8 months, respectively. The actuarial median overall survival (OS) was 27.7 months from SBRT and 52.5 months from metastases diagnosis. Patients with lesion diameter ≤ 5 cm had significantly better median liver-PFS (p = 0.006) and OS (p = 0.018). No acute or late toxicities of grade ≥ 3 were observed.

Conclusions

This prospective multicenter study confirms that liver SBRT is an effective alternative for the treatment of liver metastases, demonstrating high rates of local control and survival while maintaining a low toxicity profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available at rationale request.

References

  1. DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Siegel RL, Stein KD, Kramer JL, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(4):252–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weichselbaum RR, Hellman S. Oligometastases revisited. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(6):378–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Viganò L, Ferrero A, Lo Tesoriere R, Capussotti L. Liver surgery for colorectal metastases: results after 10 years of follow-up. Long-term survivors, late recurrences, and prognostic role of morbidity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(9):2458–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Siperstein AE, Berber E, Ballem N, Parikh RT. Survival after radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases: 10-year experience. Ann Surg. 2007;246(4):559–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herfarth KK, Debus J, Lohr F, Bahner ML, Rhein B, Fritz P, et al. Stereotactic single-dose radiation therapy of liver tumors: results of a phase I/II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(1):164–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee MT, Kim JJ, Dinniwell R, Brierley J, Lockwood G, Wong R, et al. Phase i study of individualized stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(10):1585–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodman KA, Wiegner EA, Maturen KE, Zhang Z, Mo Q, Yang G, et al. Dose-escalation study of single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78(2):486–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schefter TE, Rusthoven KE, Kavanagh BD, Cardenes H, Stieber VW, Burri SH, et al. Multi-institutional phase I/II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(10):1572–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Méndez Romero A, Wunderink W, van Os RM, Nowak PJCM, Heijmen BJM, Nuyttens JJ, et al. Quality of life after stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary and metastatic liver tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(5):1447–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoyer M, Roed H, Hansen AT, Ohlhuis L, Petersen J, Nellemann H, et al. Phase II study on stereotactic body radiotherapy of colorectal metastases. Acta Oncol. 2006;45(7):823–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scorsetti M, Comito T, Tozzi A, Navarria P, Fogliata A, Clerici E, et al. Final results of a phase II trial for stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with inoperable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015;141(3):545–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Scorsetti M, Comito T, Clerici E, Franzese C, Tozzi A, Iftode C, et al. Phase II trial on SBRT for unresectable liver metastases: long-term outcome and prognostic factors of survival after 5 years of follow-up. Radiat Oncol. 2018;13(1):234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, Gaede S, Louie AV, Haasbeek C, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligometastatic cancers: long-term results of the SABR-COMET Phase II randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(25):2830–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cancer Institute N. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (2009).

  15. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Joo Hyun O, Lodge MA, Wahl RL. Practical PERCIST: a simplified guide to PET response criteria in solid tumors 1.0. Radiology. 2016;280(2):576–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, Sobrero A, Van Krieken JH, Aderka D, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2016;27(8):1386–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, Cortés J, De Azambuja E, Demichele A, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer 5 behalf of the ESMO guidelines committee. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(12):1475–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Planchard D, Popat S, Kerr K, Novello S, Smit EF, Faivre-Finn C, et al. Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up †. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:iv192–237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Benson AB, Al-Hawary MM, Azad N, Chen Y-J, Ciombor KK, Cohen S, et al (2022) NCCN guidelines version 1. colon cancer continue NCCN guidelines panel disclosures. 2022 [cited 2022 Mar 24]; Available from: https://www.nccn.org/home/member-

  21. Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Chair V, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman JR, et al. NCCN guidelines version 32022 non-small cell lung cancer continue NCCN guidelines panel disclosures. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2022;20(5):497–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ambrosino G, Polistina F, Costantin G, Francescon P, Guglielmi R, Zanco P, et al. Image-guided robotic stereotactic radiosurgery for unresectable liver metastases: preliminary results. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(8):3381–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gaede S, Lock MI. Advances in external beam stereotactic body radiotherapy: principle concerns in implementing a liver radiation program. Chin Clin Oncol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.21037/cco.2017.06.25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jackson WC, Tao Y, Mendiratta-Lala M, Bazzi L, Wahl DR, Schipper MJ, et al. Comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of intrahepatic metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;100(4):950–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Loi M, Desideri I, Dominici L, Francolini G, Garlatti P, Ciccone LP, et al. Thermal ablation versus SBRT in liver tumours: pros and cons. Medi Oncol. 2020;37:52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Postow MA, Callahan MK, Barker CA, Yamada Y, Yuan J, Kitano S, et al. Immunologic correlates of the abscopal effect in a patient with melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(10):925–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Chang DT, Swaminath A, Kozak M, Weintraub J, Koong AC, Kim J, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: a pooled analysis. Cancer. 2011;117(17):4060–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mahadevan A, Blanck O, Lanciano R, Peddada A, Sundararaman S, D’Ambrosio D, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver metastasis—clinical outcomes from the international multi-institutional RSSearch® patient registry. Radiat Oncol. 2018;13(1):26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Méndez Romero A, Schillemans W, van Os R, Koppe F, Haasbeek CJ, Hendriksen EM, et al. The Dutch-Belgian registry of stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases: clinical outcomes of 515 patients and 668 metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;109(5):1377–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Andratschke N, Alheid H, Allgäuer M, Becker G, Blanck O, Boda-Heggemann J, et al. The SBRT database initiative of the German society for radiation oncology (DEGRO): patterns of care and outcome analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver oligometastases in 474 patients with 623 metastases. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Voglhuber T, Eitz KA, Oechsner M, Vogel MME, Combs SE. Analysis of using high-precision radiotherapy in the treatment of liver metastases regarding toxicity and survival. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08488-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare no funding or research grants received in the course of study, research or assembly of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María-Carmen Rubio Rodríguez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The autors declare that there’s no financial/personal interest or belief that could affect their objectivity, or if there is, stating the source and nature of that potential conflict.

Ethical approval

This study is a prospective, multicenter non-randomized clinical trial approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Ethics Committees at the Fundación HM Hospitales (15.04.781-GHM) and Hospital Universitario de Navarra (Pyto2015/99). The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards outlined in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participating subjects before inclusion.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodríguez, MC.R., Chen-Zhao, X., Hernando, O. et al. SBRT-SG-01: final results of a prospective multicenter study on stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver metastases. Clin Transl Oncol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03403-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03403-w

Keywords

Navigation