Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy in elderly cancer patients

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There is limited evidence on the efficacy and safety of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-/anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-based immunotherapy in the elderly, particularly those aged over 75 years.

Methods/patients

The clinical response and toxicity profile of anti-PD-1-/anti-PD-L1-based immunotherapy in patients aged over 75 years were assessed in this retrospective observational study conducted in the Medical Oncology Service of a tertiary level hospital. The associations among clinical responses, adverse events, and geriatric syndromes were evaluated.

Results

In total, 20 patients aged between 75 and 94 years were evaluated. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab were the most commonly used drugs. A clinical benefit (stable disease, partial response or complete response) was documented in 13 patients (65%). This proportion was 80% in patients aged between 75 and 79 years, and 50% in those aged over 79 years (p = 0.236). The adverse events were similar to those reported in younger patients. At least one clinical adverse event (cAE) and one laboratory adverse event (lAE) was reported in 75% and 55% of patients, respectively. Polypharmacy was observed for all patients and multi-morbidity in 95%. Patients without gait disorders showed more responses to immunotherapy. The number of lAEs was significantly associated with the number of commonly prescribed drugs (slope = 0.218, p = 0.010), the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, and the number of cAEs.

Conclusions

The elderly can obtain benefits from anti-PD-1-/anti-PD-L1-based immunotherapy. The toxicity profile was similar to that reported in younger counterparts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agostara B, Carruba G, Usset A. The management of cancer in the elderly: targeted therapies in oncology. Immun Ageing. 2008;5:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Perier-Muzet M, Gatt E, Peron J, Falandry C, Amini-Adle M, Thomas L, et al. Association of immunotherapy with overall survival in elderly patients with melanoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154:82–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–M156156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leonardi GC, Accardi G, Monastero R, Nicoletti F, Libra M. Ageing: from inflammation to cancer. Immun Ageing. 2018;15:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pawelec G. Age and immunity: what is “immunosenescence”? Exp Gerontol. 2018;105:4–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Helissey C, Vicier C, Champiat S. The development of immunotherapy in older adults: new treatments, new toxicities? J Geriatr Oncol. 2016;7:325–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elias R, Giobbie-Hurder A, McCleary NJ, Ott P, Hodi FS, Rahma O. Efficacy of PD-1 & PD-L1 inhibitors in older adults: a meta-analysis. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6:26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman CF, Wolchok JD. Checkpoint inhibition and melanoma: considerations in treating the older adult. J Geriatr Oncol. 2017;8:237–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nishijima TF, Muss HB, Shachar SS, Moschos SJ. Comparison of efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) between younger and older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;45:30–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnpulle RA, Conry RM, Sosman JA, Puzanov I, Johnson DB. Responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors in nonagenarians. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5:e1234572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu Y, Ju Q, Qian B, Zhang F, Shi H. The effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients of different ages. Oncotarget. 2018;9:7942–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Landre T, Taleb C, Nicolas P, Des Guetz G. Is there a clinical benefit of anti-PD-1 in patients older than 75 years with previously treated solid tumour? J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3070. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.3070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bristol -Myers-Squibb. OPDIVO package insert [Internet]. 12 Apr 2018. https://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_opdivo.pdf.

  15. Food and Drug Administration. Pembrolizumab Keytruda FDA Highlights of prescribing information, [Internet]. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/125514s012lbl.pdf. 12 Apr 2018

  16. Belkhir R, Burel SL, Dunogeant L, Marabelle A, Hollebecque A, Besse B, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis and polymyalgia rheumatica occurring after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:1747–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bloomer T, Alexander M, Lenihan D, Slosky D, Becker J, Sosman J, et al. Myocarditis and rhabdomyolysis incidence with immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hofmann L, Forschner A, Loquai C, Goldinger SM, Zimmer L, Ugurel S, et al. Cutaneous, gastrointestinal, hepatic, endocrine, and renal side-effects of anti-PD-1 therapy. Eur J Cancer. 2016;60:190–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tay WL, Loh WJ, Kek PC. A case of pembrolizumab-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus presenting with severe diabetic ketoacidosis. J Clin Transl Endocrinol Case Rep. 2017;6:9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cortazar FB, Marrone KA, Troxell ML, Ralto KM, Hoenig MP, Brahmer JR, et al. Clinicopathological features of acute kidney injury associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Kidney Int. 2016;90:638–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. De Martin E, Michot JM, Papouin B, Champiat S, Mateus C, Lambotte O, et al. Characterization of liver injury induced by cancer immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Hepatol. 2018;68:1181–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors also wish to thank the patients who consented to participate and release their personal data for the scientific purposes of this research.

Funding

This research has not received any funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors participated in the review and extraction of literature, design of the study, interpretation of results, and preparation of the manuscript. All authors had full access to the data and have provided their final approval of the version of the manuscript to be submitted for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Fox.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Bárbara Fox has received educational fees from Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Pierre Fabre, Kyowa Kirin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen. PharmaMar, and Mundipharma. María de Toro has received educational fees from Leo Pharma and Merck Sharp & Dohme. Rosa Álvarez Álvarez has received honorary/consulting fees from PharmaMar, Merrimack, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Jansen Oncology, Abbie, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bayer, Pierre Fabre, Peregrine Pharmaceuticals and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Antonio Calles Blanco has received honorary/consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Cristina López López has received educational fees from Roche, Pfizer and Merck Sharp & Dohme. SPR has received fees from Sanofi, Bayer, Janssen-Cilag and Roche. José Ángel Arranz has received advisory awards from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Pfizer; travel expenses coverage from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Janssen-Cilag; and research funds from Bristol-Myers Squibb. Miguel Martín has received research grants from Roche and Novartis, consulting/advisory fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Taiho Oncology, Roche/Genentech, Novartis, PharmaMar, Eli Lilly, PUMA and Pfizer and speakers’ honoraria from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Roche/Genentech, Novartis, and Pfizer, Iván Márquez-Rodas has received grants as advisor from the following: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Merck Serono, Incyte, Bioncotech Therapeutics S.L, and Sanofi.

Ethical approval

The Research Ethics Committee of Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón approved the study protocol prior to its start.

Human and animal rights

The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.

Informed consent

Patients signed the written informed consent to participate in it.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fox, B., de Toro Carmena, M., Álvarez Álvarez, R. et al. Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy in elderly cancer patients. Clin Transl Oncol 22, 555–562 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-019-02161-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-019-02161-4

Keywords

Navigation