Abstract
Aim
To assess the prevalence and prognostic significance of additional intrathoracic findings (AIFs) in patients with cancer and pulmonary embolism (PE). AIFs were considered alterations other than the characteristic ones intrinsic to PE or changes in cardiovascular morphology.
Methods
Subjects have been taken from a Spanish national multidisciplinary and multicenter study of PE and cancer who were treated between 2004 and 2015. The endpoint was the appearance of serious complications or death within 15 days.
Results
The registry contains 1024 eligible patients; 41% diagnosed by computed tomography pulmonary angiography versus 59% by non-angiographic CT. Serious complications occurred within 15 days in 18.9%, [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.6–21.4%] and 9.5% (95% CI 7.9–11.5%) died. At least one AIF was seen in 72.6%. The most common AIFs were as follows: pulmonary nodules (30.9%), pleural effusion (30.2%), tumor progression (28.3%), atelectasis (19.0%), pulmonary infarct (15.2%), emphysema (13.4%), pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis (4.5%), and pneumonia (6.1%). Patients with AIF exhibited a higher complication rate at 15 days: 21.9% versus 13.0%, odds ratio (OR) 1.8 (95% CI 1.2–2.8), P = 0.03, and 15-day mortality: 15.0% versus 7.3%, OR 1.9 (95% CI 1.1–3.2), P = 0.020. Patients with pneumonia, pneumothorax, pulmonary edema, pulmonary nodules, tumor progression, pulmonary fibrosis, and pleural effusion showed an excess of adverse events.
Conclusions
Additional intrathoracic findings are highly prevalent and significantly impact prognosis in patients with PE and cancer, making them germane to the classification of this population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Khorana AA, Dalal M, Lin J, Connolly GC. Incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among ambulatory high-risk cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in the United States. Cancer. 2013;119:648–55.
Ranpura V, Hapani S, Wu S. Treatment-related mortality with bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;305:487–94.
den Exter PL, Gómez V, Jiménez D, Trujillo-Santos J, Muriel A, Huisman MV, et al. A clinical prognostic model for the identification of low-risk patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism and active cancer. Chest. 2013;143:138–45.
Lyman GH, Khorana A, Kuderer NM, Lee AY, Arcelus JI, Balaban EP, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2189–204.
Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. When a test is too good: how CT pulmonary angiograms find pulmonary emboli that do not need to be found. BMJ. 2013;347:f3368.
Dentali F, Ageno W, Becattini C, Galli L, Gianni M, Riva N, et al. Prevalence and clinical history of incidental, asymptomatic pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2010;125:518–22.
Font C, Carmona-Bayonas A, Fernández-Martinez A, Beato C, Vargas A, Gascon P, et al. Outpatient management of pulmonary embolism in cancer: data on a prospective cohort of 138 consecutive patients. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014;12:365–73.
Font C, Carmona-Bayonas A, Plasencia JM, Calvo-Temprano D, Sánchez M, Jiménez-Fonseca P, et al. Pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: foundations of the EPIPHANY study. Med Clin. 2015;144:31–7.
Plasencia-Martínez JM, Carmona-Bayonas A, Calvo-Temprano D, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Fenoy F, Benegas M, et al. Prognostic value of computed tomography pulmonary angiography indices in patients with cancer-related pulmonary embolism: data from a multicenter cohort study. Eur J Radiol. 2017;87:66–75.
Font C, Carmona-Bayonas A, Beato C, Reig O, Saez A, Jiménez-Fonseca P, et al. Clinical features and short-term outcomes of cancer patients with suspected and unsuspected pulmonary embolism: the EPIPHANY study. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(1):1600282.
Carmona-Bayonas A, Font C, Fonseca PJ, Fenoy F, Otero R, Beato C, et al. On the necessity of new decision-making methods for cancer-associated, symptomatic, pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2016;143:76–85.
Carmona-Bayonas A, Fonseca PJ, Font C, Fenoy F, Candelera RO, Beato C, et al. Predicting serious complications in patients with cancer and pulmonary embolism using decision tree modeling: the EPIPHANY index. Br J Ca. 2017; 116: 994–1001. [Epub ahead of print].
Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Muller NL, Remy J. Fleischner society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology. 2008;246:697–722.
Strobl C, Boulesteix AL, Zeileis A, Hothorn T. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinform. 2007;8:25.
Falanga A, Marchetti M, Vignoli A. Coagulation and cancer: biological and clinical aspects. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11:223–33.
Araoz PA, Gotway MB, Harrington JR, Harmsen WS, Mandrekar JN. Pulmonary embolism: prognostic CT findings. Radiology. 2007;242:897.
Ghaye BG, Willems V. Severe pulmonary embolism: pulmonary artery clot load scores and cardiovascular parameters as predictors of mortality. Radiology. 2006;239:884–91.
Henzler T, Barraza JM, Nance JW, Costello P, Krissak R, Fink C, et al. CT imaging of acute pulmonary embolism. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5:3–11.
Ghuysen A, Ghaye B, Willems V, Lambermont B, Gerard P, Dondelinger RF, et al. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography and prognostic significance in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax. 2005;60:956–61.
van der Meer RW, Pattynama PMT, van Strijen MJL, van den Berg-Huijsmans AA, Hartmann IJC, Putter H, et al. Right ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary obstruction index at helical CT: prediction of clinical outcome during 3-month follow-up in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Radiology. 2005;235:798–803.
Vedovati MC, Germini F, Agnelli G, Becattini C. Prognostic role of embolic burden assessed at computed tomography angiography in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11:2092–102.
Park JR, Chang S-A, Jang SY, No HJ, Park S-J, Choi S-H, et al. Evaluation of right ventricular dysfunction and prediction of clinical outcomes in acute pulmonary embolism by chest computed tomography: comparisons with echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28:979–87.
Acknowledgments
All the authors would like to thank Priscilla Chase Duran for editing the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None to declare. This is an academic study.
Funding source
This project was funded in part by a restricted educational grant from Leo Pharma Spain and by support from the Asociación de Investigación de la Enfermedad Tromboembólica de la Región de Murcia.
Ethical statement
The study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. This study is an observational trial without intervention.
Informed consent
Signed informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiménez-Fonseca, P., Carmona-Bayonas, A., Font, C. et al. The prognostic impact of additional intrathoracic findings in patients with cancer-related pulmonary embolism. Clin Transl Oncol 20, 230–242 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1713-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1713-3