Skip to main content
Log in

Ideal free flows of optimal foragers: Vertical migrations in the ocean

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Theoretical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the collective motion of animals in time-varying environments, using as a case the diel vertical migration of marine copepods. The animals are distributed in space such that each animal moves optimally, seeking regions which offer high growth rates and low mortalities, subject to costs on excessive movements as well as being in regions with high densities of conspecifics. The model applies to repeated scenarios such as diel or seasonal patterns, where the animals are aware of both current and future environmental conditions. We show that this problem can be viewed as a differential game of mean field type, and that the evolutionary stable solution, i.e., the Nash equilibrium, is characterized by partial differential equations, which govern the distributions and migration velocities of animals. These equations have similarities to equations that appear in the fluid dynamics, specifically the Euler equations for compressible inviscid fluids. If the environment is constant, the ideal free distribution emerges as an equilibrium. We illustrate the theory with a numerical example of vertical migrations of oceanic copepods, where animals are attracted to nutrient-rich surface waters while repulsed from light during daytime due to the presence of visual predators, aiming to reduce both proximity to conspecifics and swimming efforts. For this case, we show that optimal movements are diel vertical migrations in qualitative agreement with observations of copepods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

The code used to perform the calculations and generate the figures will be placed in a publicly accessible GitHub repository after acceptance of the manuscript.

References

  • Achdou Y, Capuzzo-Dolcetta I (2010) Mean field games: numerical methods. SIAM J Numer Anal 48(3):1136–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achdou Y, Lasry JM (2019) Mean field games for modeling crowd motion. In: Contributions to Partial Differential Equations and Applications, Springer, pp 17–42

  • Aksnes DL, Utne ACW (1997) A revised model of visual range in fish. Sarsia 82(2):137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander J, Yorke J (1978) The homotopy continuation method: Numerically implementable topological procedures. Trans Am Math Soc 242:271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen KH (2019) Fish Ecology, Evolution, and Exploitation: A New Theoretical Synthesis. Princeton University Press

  • Batchelor G (1967) An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge Mathematical Library

  • Bollens SM, Frost B (1989) Predator-induced diet vertical migration in a planktonic copepod. J Plankton Res 11(5):1047–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond GP (1861) Comparison of the light of the sun and moon. Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 8(1):287–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brierley AS (2014) Diel vertical migration. Curr Biol 24(22):R1074–R1076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brönmark C, Skov C, Brodersen J, Nilsson PA, Hansson LA (2008) Seasonal migration determined by a trade-off between predator avoidance and growth. PLoS ONE 3(4):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell RS, Cosner C (2018) Evolutionary stability of ideal free dispersal under spatial heterogeneity and time periodicity. Math Biosci 305:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell RS, Cosner C, Lou Y (2010) Evolution of dispersal and the ideal free distribution. Math Biosci Eng 7(1):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell RS, Cosner C, Lam KY (2021) Ideal free dispersal under general spatial heterogeneity and time periodicity. SIAM J Appl Math 81(3):789–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman JW, Reynolds DR, Wilson K (2015) Long-range seasonal migration in insects: mechanisms, evolutionary drivers and ecological consequences. Ecol Lett 18(3):287–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cisewski B, Strass VH, Rhein M, Krägefsky S (2010) Seasonal variation of diel vertical migration of zooplankton from ADCP backscatter time series data in the Lazarev Sea, Antarctica. Deep Sea Res Part I 57(1):78–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cosner C (2005) A dynamic model for the ideal-free distribution as a partial differential equation. Theor Popul Biol 67(2):101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Boyer Montégut C, Madec G, Fischer AS, Lazar A, Iudicone D (2004) Mixed layer depth over the global ocean: An examination of profile data and a profile-based climatology. J Geophys Res Oceans 109(C12)

  • Fretwell SD, Lucas HL (1969) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor 19:16–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier S, Rose GA (2005) Diel vertical migration and shoaling heterogeneity in Atlantic redfish: effects on acoustic and bottom-trawl surveys. ICES J Mar Sci 62(1):75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geritz SA, Mesze G, Metz JA et al (1998) Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol Ecol 12(1):35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein H, Poole C, Safko J (2002) Classical mechanics (third ed.). Addison Wesley

  • He JH (1999) Homotopy perturbation technique. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 178(3–4):257–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst AG, Kiørboe T (2002) Mortality of marine planktonic copepods: Global rates and patterns. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 230:195–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa Y (1982) Vertical migration of zooplankton: a game between predator and prey. Am Nat 120(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josse E, Bach P, Dagorn L (1998) Simultaneous observations of tuna movements and their prey by sonic tracking and acoustic surveys. Hydrobiologia 371:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiørboe T (2008a) A Mechanistic Approach to Plankton Ecology. Princeton University Press

  • Kiørboe T (2008b) Optimal swimming strategies in mate-searching pelagic copepods. Oecologia 155:179–192

  • Kiørboe T, Møhlenberg F, Hamburger K (1985) Bioenergetics of the planktonic copepod acartia tonsa: relation between feeding, egg production and respiration, and composition of specific dynamic action. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 26:85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiørboe T, Jiang H, Gonçalves RJ, Nielsen LT, Wadhwa N (2014) Flow disturbances generated by feeding and swimming zooplankton. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(32):11738–11743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiørboe T, Visser A, Andersen KH (2018) A trait-based approach to ocean ecology. ICES J Mar Sci 75(6):1849–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klevjer TA, Irigoien X, Røstad A, Fraile-Nuez E, Benítez-Barrios VM, Kaartvedt S (2016) Large scale patterns in vertical distribution and behaviour of mesopelagic scattering layers. Sci Rep 6:19873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kopriva D (2009) Implementing Spectral Methods for Partial Differential Equations: Algorithms for Scientists and Engineers. Scientific Computation, Springer, Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lasry JM, Lions PL (2007) Mean field games. Japan J Math 2(1):229–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberzon D (2011) Calculus of variations and optimal control theory: a concise introduction. Princeton University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Longhurst AR, Harrison WG (1989) The biological pump: profiles of plankton production and consumption in the upper ocean. Prog Oceanogr 22(1):47–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangel M, Clark CW (1986) Towards a unified foraging theory. Ecology 67(5):1127–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangel M, Clark CW (1988) Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Munk P, Kiørboe T (1985) Feeding behaviour and swimming activity of larval herring(clupea harengus) in relation to density of copepod nauplii. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 24(1):15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan R, Getz WM, Revilla E, Holyoak M, Kadmon R, Saltz D, Smouse PE (2008) A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(49):19052–19059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohman MD, Frost BW, Cohen EB (1983) Reverse diel vertical migration: An escape from invertebrate predators. Science 220(4604):1404–1407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okubo A, Levin S (2001) Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Modern Perspectives. Springer

  • Owen-Smith N, Fryxell JM, Merrill EH (2010) Foraging theory upscaled: the behavioural ecology of herbivore movement. Philos Trans R Soc B 365(1550):2267–2278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinti J, Visser AW (2019) Predator-prey games in multiple habitats reveal mixed strategies in diel vertical migration. Am Nat 193(3):E65–E77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainmont J, Thygesen UH, Visser AW (2013) Diel vertical migration arising in a habitat selection game. Thyroid Res 6(2):241–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharqawy MH, Lienhard JH, Zubair SM (2010) Thermophysical properties of seawater: a review of existing correlations and data. Desalin Water Treat 16(1–3):354–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sprung M (1984) Physiological energetics of mussel larvae (mytilus edulis). 111. respiration. Marine Ecology Progress Series 18:171

  • Thygesen UH, Patterson TA (2018) Oceanic diel vertical migrations arising from a predator-prey game. Theor Ecol pp 1–13

  • Thygesen UH, Sommer L, Evans K, Patterson TA (2016) Dynamic optimal foraging theory explains vertical migrations of bigeye tuna. Ecology 97(7):1852–1861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz K, Smith SL (2020) Vertical migration by bulk phytoplankton sustains biodiversity and nutrient input to the surface ocean. Sci Rep 10(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wozniak B, Dera J (2007) Light absorption in sea water, vol 33. Springer

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

MM is partially funded by The Centre for Ocean Life, a VKR Centre of excellence supported by the Villum Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

UHT conceived the study and the analysis. MM detailed the analysis and the numerical implementation. UHT drafted the initial manuscript and both authors completed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uffe Høgsbro Thygesen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thygesen, U.H., Mazuryn, M. Ideal free flows of optimal foragers: Vertical migrations in the ocean. Theor Ecol 15, 213–224 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-022-00538-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-022-00538-w

Keywords

Navigation