Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

MAFLD identifies patients with significant hepatic fibrosis better than MASLD

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hepatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

Diagnostic criteria for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) have been proposed but not yet validated. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the MASLD definition with the existing criteria for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in identifying patients with significant fibrosis.

Methods

The analysis included a total of 8317 individuals who had complete biochemical and liver ultrasonography data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2017–2020). In this study, significant fibrosis (≥ F2) was determined by a median liver stiffness of ≥ 8.0 kPa. To identify independent factors associated with significant fibrosis, multivariable logistic regression analyses were applied.

Results

MAFLD (OR 3.44; 95% CI 2.88–4.12; P < 0.0001) has a trend for stronger and independent association with significant fibrosis compared to MASLD (OR 2.63; 95% CI 2.22–3.11; P < 0.0001). Non-MASLD MAFLD is independently associated with a 14.28-fold higher odds of significant fibrosis compared to non-MAFLD MASLD. The sensitivity for detecting significant fibrosis for MAFLD and MASLD was 76.23% vs 69.94%, respectively. The performance of MAFLD remains consistent in a sub-analysis of patients with no or mild alcohol intake.

Conclusions

The definition of MAFLD provides a more precise identification of individuals who have both fatty liver and significant fibrosis, assessed by non-invasive tests.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Chan KE, Koh TJL, Tang ASP, Quek J, Yong JN, Tay P, et al. Global prevalence and clinical characteristics of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review of 10 739 607 individuals. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107:2691–2700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eslam M, El-Serag HB, Francque S, Sarin SK, Wei L, Bugianesi E, et al. Metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease in individuals of normal weight. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;19:638–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, Anstee QM, Targher G, Romero-Gomez M, et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: an international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol. 2020;73:202–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eslam M, Sanyal AJ, George J, Sanyal A, Neuschwander-Tetri B, Tiribelli C, et al. MAFLD: a consensus-driven proposed nomenclature for metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(1999–2014):e1991

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eslam M, Alkhouri N, Vajro P, Baumann U, Weiss R, Socha P, et al. Defining paediatric metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease: an international expert consensus statement. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6:864–873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, Francque SM, Sanyal AJ, Kanwal F, et al. A multi-society Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. Ann Hepatol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000000696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vilar-Gomez E, Calzadilla-Bertot L, Wong VW-S, Castellanos M, Aller-de la Fuente R, Metwally M, et al. Fibrosis severity as a determinant of cause-specific mortality in patients with advanced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a multi-national cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:443–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Petta S, Eslam M, Valenti L, Bugianesi E, Barbara M, Cammà C, et al. Metabolic syndrome and severity of fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: an age-dependent risk profiling study. Liver Int. 2017;37:1389–1396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alharthi J, Eslam M. Biomarkers of metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease: an update. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2022;10:134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamamura S, Eslam M, Kawaguchi T, Tsutsumi T, Nakano D, Yoshinaga S, et al. MAFLD identifies patients with significant hepatic fibrosis better than NAFLD. Liver Int. 2020;40:3018–3030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ayada I, van Kleef LA, Alferink LJ, Li P, de Knegt RJ, Pan Q. Systematically comparing epidemiological and clinical features of MAFLD and NAFLD by meta-analysis: focusing on the non-overlap groups. Liver Int. 2022;42:277–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin S, Huang J, Wang M, Kumar R, Liu Y, Liu S, et al. Comparison of MAFLD and NAFLD diagnostic criteria in real world. Liver Int. 2020;40:2082–2089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Siddiqui MS, Vuppalanchi R, Van Natta ML, Hallinan E, Kowdley KV, Abdelmalek M, et al. Vibration-controlled transient elastography to assess fibrosis and steatosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(156–163):e152

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wong GL-H. Update of liver fibrosis and steatosis with transient elastography (Fibroscan). Gastroenterol Rep. 2013;1:19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eslam M, Sarin SK, Wong VW-S, Fan J-G, Kawaguchi T, Ahn SH, et al. The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Hepatol Int. 2020;14:889–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawaguchi T, Tsutsumi T, Nakano D, Eslam M, George J, Torimura T. MAFLD enhances clinical practice for liver disease in the Asia-Pacific region. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022;28:150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alharthi J, Gastaldelli A, Cua IH, Ghazinian H, Eslam M. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: a year in review. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2022;38:251–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsutsumi T, Eslam M, Kawaguchi T, Yamamura S, Kawaguchi A, Nakano D, et al. MAFLD better predicts the progression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk than NAFLD: generalized estimating equation approach. Hepatol Res. 2021;51:1115–1128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fukunaga S, Nakano D, Kawaguchi T, Eslam M, Ouchi A, Nagata T, et al. Non-obese MAFLD is associated with colorectal adenoma in health check examinees: a multicenter retrospective study. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:5462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramírez-Mejía MM, Jiménez-Gutiérrez C, Eslam M, George J, Méndez-Sánchez N. Breaking new ground: MASLD vs. MAFLD—which holds the key for risk stratification? Hepatol Int. 2024;18:168–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

ME is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Program Grant (APP1053206) and Project and ideas grants (APP2001692, APP1107178 and APP1108422).

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council,APP1053206, Mohammed Eslam,APP2001692, Mohammed Eslam,APP1107178, Mohammed Eslam,APP1108422, Mohammed Eslam.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Eslam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, Z., Al-Busafi, S.A., Abdulla, M. et al. MAFLD identifies patients with significant hepatic fibrosis better than MASLD. Hepatol Int 18, 964–972 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-024-10673-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-024-10673-7

Keywords

Navigation