Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Longitudinal renal changes in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir versus TDF: a REAL-B study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hepatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

We aimed to compare the longitudinal changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients treated with entecavir (ETV) vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).

Methods

This is a retrospective study of 6189 adult treatment-naïve CHB patients initiated therapy with TDF (n = 2482) or ETV (n = 3707) at 25 international centers using multivariable generalized linear modeling (GLM) to determine mean eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) and Kaplan–Meier method to estimate incidence of renal impairment (≥ 1 chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage worsening). We also examined above renal changes in matched ETV and TDF patients (via propensity score matching [PSM] on age, sex, diabetes mellitus [DM], hypertension [HTN], cirrhosis, baseline eGFR, and follow-up duration).

Results

In the overall cohort (mean age 49.7 years, 66.2% male), the baseline eGFR was higher for TDF vs. ETV group (75.9 vs. 74.0, p = 0.009). PSM yielded 1871 pairs of ETV or TDF patients with baseline eGFR ≥ 60 and 520 pairs for the eGFR < 60 group. GLM analysis of the overall (unmatched) cohort and PSM cohorts revealed lower adjusted mean eGFRs in TDF (vs. ETV) patients (all p < 0.01) during 10 years of follow-up. Among PSM eGFR ≥ 60 patients, the 5-year cumulative incidences of renal impairment were 42.64% for ETV and 48.03% for TDF (p = 0.0023). In multivariable Cox regression, TDF vs. ETV (adjusted HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.11–1.43) was associated with higher risk of worsening renal function.

Conclusion

Over the 10-year study follow-up, compared to ETV, TDF was associated with a lower mean eGFR and higher incidence of renal impairment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Data available within the article or its supplementary materials.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

CHB:

Chronic hepatitis B

CI:

Confidence interval

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

EASL:

The European Association for the Study of the Liver

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

ETV:

Entecavir

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HTN:

Hypertension

KDIGO:

Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes

NA:

Nucleos(t)ide analogs

PSM:

Propensity score matching

TAF:

Tenofovir alafenamide

TDF:

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

References

  1. Fabrizi F, Donato FM, Messa P. Association between hepatitis B virus and chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Hepatol. 2017;16:21–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ning L, Lin W, Hu X, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a cross-sectional survey. J Viral Hepat. 2017;24:1043–1051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mauss S, Berger F, Filmann N, et al. Effect of HBV polymerase inhibitors on renal function in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2011;55:1235–1240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hong YS, Ryu S, Chang Y, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection and development of chronic kidney disease: a cohort study. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen YC, Su YC, Li CY, et al. A nationwide cohort study suggests chronic hepatitis B virus infection increases the risk of end-stage renal disease among patients in Taiwan. Kidney Int. 2015;87:1030–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ly KN, Xing J, Klevens RM, et al. Causes of death and characteristics of decedents with viral hepatitis, United States, 2010. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rajbhandari R, Danford CJ, Chung RT, et al. HBV infection is associated with greater mortality in hospitalised patients compared to HCV infection or alcoholic liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;41:928–938

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Qi X, Wang JY, Mao RC, et al. Impact of nucleos(t)ide analogues on the estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a prospective cohort study in China. J Viral Hepat. 2015;22:46–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan HL, Shaikh J, Gupta S, et al. Renal function in nucleos(t)ide analog-treated patients with chronic hepatitis B: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. Adv Ther. 2016;33:862–875

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Han Y, Zeng A, Liao H, et al. The efficacy and safety comparison between tenofovir and entecavir in treatment of chronic hepatitis B and HBV related cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2017;42:168–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsai MC, Chen CH, Tseng PL, et al. Comparison of renal safety and efficacy of telbivudine, entecavir and tenofovir treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients: real world experience. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:951 e1-957 e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Izzedine H, Launay-Vacher V, Deray G. Antiviral drug-induced nephrotoxicity. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;45:804–817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tanji N, Tanji K, Kambham N, et al. Adefovir nephrotoxicity: possible role of mitochondrial DNA depletion. Hum Pathol. 2001;32:734–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Perazella MA. Tenofovir-induced kidney disease: an acquired renal tubular mitochondriopathy. Kidney Int. 2010;78:1060–1063

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kohler JJ, Hosseini SH, Hoying-Brandt A, et al. Tenofovir renal toxicity targets mitochondria of renal proximal tubules. Lab Invest. 2009;89:513–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee HY, Oh H, Park CH, et al. Comparison of renal safety of tenofovir and entecavir in patients with chronic hepatitis B: Systematic review with meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:2961–2972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodriguez-Novoa S, Garcia-Samaniego J, Prieto M, et al. Altered underlying renal tubular function in patients with chronic hepatitis b receiving nucleos(t)ide analogs in a real-world setting: the MENTE study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;50:779–789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Trinh S, Le AK, Chang ET, et al. Changes in renal function in patients with chronic HBV infection treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs entecavir. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17:948-956 e1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen MH, Lim JK, Burak Ozbay A, et al. Advancing age and comorbidity in a US insured population-based cohort of patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2019;69:959–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wong GL, Wong VW, Yuen BW, et al. An aging population of chronic hepatitis B with increasing comorbidities: a territory-wide study from 2000 to 2017. Hepatology. 2020;71:444–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Weinstein JR, Anderson S. The aging kidney: physiological changes. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2010;17:302–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vu V, Trinh S, Le A, et al. Hepatitis B and renal function: a matched study comparing non-hepatitis B, untreated, treated and cirrhotic hepatitis patients. Liver Int. 2019;39:655–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Amarapurkar DN, Dhawan P, Kalro RH. Role of routine estimation of creatinine clearance in patients with liver cirrhosis. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1994;13:79–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gines P, Schrier RW. Renal failure in cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1279–1290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address eee, European Association for the Study of the L. EASL. Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2017;2017(67):370–398

    Google Scholar 

  26. Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology. 2018;67:1560–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guidelines for the Prevention, Care and Treatment of Persons with Chronic Hepatitis B Infection. Geneva, 2015. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549059

  28. Sarin SK, Kumar M, Lau GK, et al. Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update. Hepatol Int. 2016;10:1–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. KDIGO. Clinical practice guideline update for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention and treatment of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). Kidney Int Suppl. 2017;2017(7):1–59

    Google Scholar 

  31. Drug full prescribing information for Viread. The Food and Drug Administration, 2012. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/022577lbl.pdf

  32. Mak LY, Seto WK, Lai CL, et al. DNA polymerase inhibitors for treating hepatitis B: a safety evaluation. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15:383–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Buti M, Riveiro-Barciela M, Esteban R. Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate: a new tenofovir prodrug for the treatment of chronic hepatitis b infection. J Infect Dis. 2017;216:S792–S796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lampertico P, Buti M, Fung S, et al. Switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide in virologically suppressed patients with chronic hepatitis B: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, multicentre non-inferiority study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:441–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Toyoda H, Leong J, Landis C, et al. Treatment and renal outcomes up to 96 weeks after tenofovir alafenamide switch from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in routine practice. Hepatology. 2021;74:656–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Peralta CA, Katz R, DeBoer I, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in kidney function decline among persons without chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:1327–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concept: MHN. Study supervision: MFY and MHN. Study design: LYM, JH, MFY, MHN. Data analysis: JH and MHN. Drafting of the article: LYM, JH, MFY, MHN. Data collection, data interpretation, review and/or revision of the manuscript: all authors. All authors identified have critically reviewed the paper and approve the final version of this paper, including the authorship statement.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Man-Fung Yuen or Mindie H. Nguyen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

CYP: Consulting/ Advisory board member: Abbvie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Roche. DQH: Research grant: Exxon Mobil-NUS Fellowship, NMRC Research Training Fellowship. HT: Research grant: Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Target; Consulting/ advisory board: Gilead Sciences; Speaker fees: Gilead Sciences; Stock ownership: Gilead Sciences. GLHW: Research grant: Gilead Sciences; Consulting/ advisory board: Gilead Sciences, Janssen; Speaker fees: Abbott, Abbvie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences. DHL: Research grant: Bristol Myers Squibb Korea, Gilead Sciences (Korea), Janssen Korea, Korea Pharma. EO: Speaker fees: Gilead Sciences. CYD: Speaker fees: Abbvie, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Gilead Sciences, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb. WLC: Consulting: Gilead Sciences, Abbvie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp and Dohme, PharmaEssentia; Speaker fees: Gilead Sciences, Abbvie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp and Dohme, PharmaEssentia. MLY: Research grant: Abbott, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp and Dohme; Consulting: Abbvie, Abbott, Ascletis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Roche; Speaker fees: Abbvie, Abbott, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp and Dohme, IPSEN. MFY: Research funding: Assembly Biosciences, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myer Squibb, Fujirebio Incorporation, Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Springbank Pharmaceuticals, Sysmex Corporation; advisory board member: Abbvie, Arbutus Biopharma, Assembly Biosciences, Bristol Myer Squibb, Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Clear B Therapeutics, Springbank Pharmaceuticals. MHN: Research grant: Gilead, Vir; Consulting/advisory board: Novartis, Spring Bank, Janssen, Gilead, Exact Sciences, Eli Lilly. All other authors have disclosed no personal conflict of interests in regards to the content of this paper.

Ethics approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethics principles of the Declaration of Helsinki in 1975, as revised in 2008, and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Stanford University and at each participating institution.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 881 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mak, LY., Hoang, J., Jun, D.W. et al. Longitudinal renal changes in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir versus TDF: a REAL-B study. Hepatol Int 16, 48–58 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-021-10271-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-021-10271-x

Keywords

Navigation