Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Cognitive Rehabilitation by Auditory Stroop Training on Quality of Life of Individuals with Tinnitus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown that tinnitus patients have difficulties in cognitive function such as memory and attention. The Stroop task engages the attention network where one aspect of the stimulus is noticed while the other one is ignored. Thus, Stroop training can improve the patient’s cognitive control and ability to ignore the tinnitus signal. Method: Thirty chronic tinnitus (> 6 months) patients were included in this study. They were distributed into two 15-member groups: intervention and control. Common audiometric, psychometric, and psychoacoustic evaluations of tinnitus were performed for two groups before intervention and after auditory Stroop training of group 1. Results: There was significant difference in the quality of life and THI scores, VAS of annoyance, and reaction time of Stroop task before and after intervention in group1. The decreased reaction time was positively correlated with improved quality of life, THI score, and VAS of annoyance. Conclusion: Cognitive rehabilitation using tasks such as auditory Stroop can be effective in controlling tinnitus by improving cognitive control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacquemin L, Shekhawat GS, Van de Heyning P, Mertens G, Fransen E, Van Rompaey V et al (2018) Effects of electrical stimulation in tinnitus patients: conventional versus high-definition tDCS. Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair 32(8):714–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Labree B, Hoare DJ, Gascoyne LE, Sereda M (2021) Determining the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on tinnitus and tinnitus-related outcomes: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ open 11(3):e047191

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. McFerran DJ, Stockdale D, Holme R, Large CH, Baguley DM (2019) Why is there no cure for tinnitus? Front NeuroSci 13:802

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sedley W, Friston KJ, Gander PE, Kumar S, Griffiths TD (2016) An integrative tinnitus model based on sensory precision. Trends Neurosci 39(12):799–812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Araneda R, Renier L, Dricot L, Decat M, Ebner-Karestinos D, Deggouj N et al (2018) A key role of the prefrontal cortex in the maintenance of chronic tinnitus: an fMRI study using a Stroop task. NeuroImage: Clin 17:325–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chambers CD, Garavan H, Bellgrove MA (2009) Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neurosci biobehavioral reviews 33(5):631–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Golm D, Schmidt-Samoa C, Dechent P, Kröner-Herwig BJBE, Disorders T, Nose (2016) Tinnitus-related distress: evidence from fMRI of an emotional stroop task. BMC Ear Nose and Throat Disorders 16(1):10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Langguth B, Llinas RJFin (2015) Thalamocortical dysrhythmia: a theoretical update in tinnitus. Front Neurol 6:124

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Langguth B, Schecklmann M, Lehner A, Landgrebe M, Poeppl TB, Kreuzer PM et al (2012) Neuroimaging and neuromodulation: complementary approaches for identifying the neuronal correlates of tinnitus. Front Syst Neurosci 6:15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Xing M, Kallogjeri D, Piccirillo JF (2021) Investigating the impact of cognitive training for individuals with Bothersome Tinnitus: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. :0194599821994742

  11. Wilkinson AJ, Yang L (2012) Plasticity of inhibition in older adults: retest practice and transfer effects. Psychol Aging 27(3):606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Andersson G, Bakhsh R, Johansson L, Kaldo V, Carlbring PJC (eds) (2005) ;8(1):32 – 8

  13. Christensen TA, Lockwood JL, Almryde KR, Plante EJFihn (2011) Neural substrates of attentive listening assessed with a novel auditory Stroop task. Front Hum Neurosci 4:236

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Aslam F, Aslam A, Zaheer MJP (2018) Comparison between Time taken to complete MMSE score by demented and depressed patients. Med Speech Lang Hear Res 13(4):209–213

    Google Scholar 

  15. Trevis KJ, McLachlan NM, Wilson SJJFip (2016) Cognitive mechanisms in chronic tinnitus: psychological markers of a failure to switch attention. Frontire in Psychology 7:1262

    Google Scholar 

  16. Talanow T, Ettinger UJAp (2018) Effects of task repetition but no transfer of inhibitory control training in healthy adults. Acta Psychol 187(Acta Psychologica):37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Henkin Y, Yaar-Soffer Y, Gilat S, Muchnik CJJotAAoA (2010) Auditory conflict processing: behavioral and electrophysiologic manifestations of the Stroop effect. J Am Acad Audiol 21(7):474–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts KL (2008) Hall DAJJocn. Examining a supramodal network for conflict processing: a systematic review and novel functional magnetic resonance imaging data for related visual and auditory stroop tasks. J Cogn Neurosci 20(6):1063–1078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Carter CS, Van Veen V, Cognitive (2007) Affect Behav Neurosci 7(4):367–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Janssen S, Heijs J, van der Meijs W, Nonnekes J, Bittner M, Dorresteijn L et al (2019) Validation of the auditory Stroop Task to increase cognitive load in walking tasks in healthy elderly and persons with Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE 14(8):e0220735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahmoudian S, Shahmiri E, Rouzbahani M, Jafari Z, Reza Keyhani M, Rahimi F et al (2011) Persian language version of the” Tinnitus Handicap Inventory”: translation, standardization, validity and reliability. Int Tinnitus J. ;16(2)

  22. Yang S, Weiner BD, Zhang LS, Cho S-J, Bao S (2011) Homeostatic plasticity drives tinnitus perception in an animal model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. ;108(36):14974-9

  23. Leaver AM, Seydell-Greenwald A, Turesky T, Morgan S, Kim HJ, Rauschecker JP (2012) Cortico-limbic morphology separates tinnitus from tinnitus distress. Front Syst Neurosci 6:21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Plewnia C, Reimold M, Najib A, Brehm B, Reischl G, Plontke SK et al (2007) Dose-dependent attenuation of auditory phantom perception (tinnitus) by PET‐guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp 28(3):238–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gregg MK, Purdy KA (2007) Graded auditory Stroop effects generated by gender words. Percept Mot Skills 105(2):549–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Herd SA, Banich MT, O’reilly RC (2006) Neural mechanisms of cognitive control: an integrative model of Stroop task performance and fMRI data. J Cogn Neurosci 18(1):22–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang L, Krampe RT, Baltes PB (2006) Basic forms of cognitive plasticity extended into the oldest-old: retest learning, age, and cognitive functioning. Psychol Aging 21(2):372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, Jobe JB, Leveck MD, Marsiske M et al (2002) Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288(18):2271–2281

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao X, Chen L, Maes JH (2018) Training and transfer effects of response inhibition training in children and adults. Dev Sci 21(1):e12511

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to individuals participated in this study. This research was supported by Iran University of Medical Sciences.

Funding

This study was not funded by any organization or company.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryam Emadi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Emadi, M., Rasa, A.R., Moossavi, A. et al. Effect of Cognitive Rehabilitation by Auditory Stroop Training on Quality of Life of Individuals with Tinnitus. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 75, 3487–3492 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-04011-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-04011-w

Keywords

Navigation