Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Epistaxis Treatment Options: Literature Review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Epistaxis means bleeding from nostrils, nasal cavity or nasopharynx. To summarize the available epistaxis treatment options. Methods: 61 articles published in the last 20 years were included. Duplicate records, irrelevant and inaccessible ones were excluded.  Epistaxis can be treated with first aid measures such as external pressure and ice packing and applying topical agents, e.g. oxymetazoline that stops 65–75% of nosebleeds in A&E. Also, with electrocautery which is more effective and has fewer recurrences (14.5% vs. 35.1%) than chemical cauterization and applying tranexamic acid that promotes hemostasis in 78% of patients, versus 35% and 31% respectively in patients treated with oxymetazoline and nasal packing. Furthermore, nasal packing can be applied with non-absorbable materials, e.g. petroleum jelly, BIPP gauze, PVA nasal tampons (Merocel), Foley catheter, balloons (Rapid-Rhino), absorbable materials, e.g. nasal tampon (Nasopore), and with newer hemostatic materials which are more effective and with fewer complications, e.g. hemostatic gauzes (Surgicel), thrombin matrix (Floseal), gelatin sponge (Spongostan) and fibrin glue. Moreover, epistaxis can be achieved with endoscopic ligation of arteries, mainly SPA, which is more effective than conventional nasal packing (97% vs. 62%), and with endoscopic cauterization which is more effective than ligation. Finally, for intractable cases embolization can be applied using gelatin sponge, foam, PVA and coils with 80% success rate and comparable efficacy and complications to surgical methods. Epistaxis can be dealt with various methods depending on patient's history and available resources. Newer hemostatic agents in combination with endoscopic methods have advantages over traditional methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kucik CJ, Clenney T (2005) Management of epistaxis. Am Fam Physician 71(2):305–311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Svider P, Arianpour K, Mutchnick S (2018) Management of epistaxis in children and adolescents: avoiding a chaotic approach. Pediatr Clin North Am 65(3):607–621

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan M, Conroy K, Ubayasiri K, Constable J, Smith ME, Williams RJ et al (2017) Initial assessment in the management of adult epistaxis: systematic review. J Laryngol Otol 131(12):1035–1055

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hajimaghsoudi M, Largani HA, Baradaranfar MH, Aghabagheri M, Jafari MA, Saeedi M (2018) A novel method for epistaxis management: randomized clinical trial comparing nose clip with manual compression. Am J Emerg Med 36(1):149–150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Béquignon E, Teissier N, Gauthier A, Brugel L, De Kermadec H, Coste A et al (2017) Emergency Department care of childhood epistaxis. Emerg Med J 34(8):543–548

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tran QK, Barnett J, O’Connell F, D’Anza B, Pourmand A (2021) Nasal packing in the emergency department: a practical review for emergency providers. Open Access Emerg Med 13:527–533

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Beck R, Sorge M, Schneider A, Dietz A (2018) Current approaches to epistaxis treatment in primary and secondary care. Dtsch Arztebl Int 115(1–02):12–22

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Middleton PM (2004) Epistaxis. Emerg Med Australas 16(5–6):428–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meccariello G, Georgalas C, Montevecchi F, Cammaroto G, Gobbi R, Firinu E et al (2019) Management of idiopathic epistaxis in adults: What’s new. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 39(4):211–219

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Michel J, Prulière Escabasse V, Bequignon E, Vérillaud B, Robard L, Crampette L et al (2017) Guidelines of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SFORL). Epistaxis and high blood pressure. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 134(1):33–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bastianpillai J, Saxby C, Coyle P, Armstrong A, Mohamid W, Mochloulis G (2019) Evaluating nasal cautery techniques in epistaxis. J Laryngol Otol 133(10):923–927

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shargorodsky J, Bleier BS, Holbrook EH, Cohen JM, Busaba N, Metson R et al (2013) Outcomes analysis in epistaxis management: development of a therapeutic algorithm. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149(3):390–398

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bequignon E, Vérillaud B, Robard L, Michel J, Prulière Escabasse V, Crampette L, Malard O, SFORL work-group (2017) Guidelines of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SFORL). First-line treatment of epistaxis in adults. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 134(3):185–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2016.09.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson N, Faria J, Behar P (2015) A comparison of bipolar electrocautery and chemical cautery for control of pediatric recurrent anterior epistaxis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 153(5):851–856

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mcleod RWJ, Price A, Williams RJ, Smith ME, Smith M, Owens D (2017) Intranasal cautery for the management of adult epistaxis: systematic review. J Laryngol Otol 131(12):1056–1064

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Henderson A, Larkins A, Repanos C (2013) The use of bipolar electrocautery in adult epistaxis management: using audit of one hundred and twenty-four cases to define a standardised protocol. Clin Otolaryngol 38(6):554–558

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kindler RM, Holzmann D, Landis BN, Ditzen B, Soyka MB (2016) The high rate of long-term recurrences and sequelae after epistaxis treatment. Auris Nasus Larynx 43(4):412–417

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koçak HE, Bilece ZT, Keskin M, Ulusoy HA, Koç AK, Kaya KH (2021) Comparison of topical treatment methods used in recurrent anterior epistaxis: a randomized clinical trial. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 87(2):132–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Calder N, Kang S, Fraser L, Kunanandam T, Montgomery J, Kubba H (2009) A double-blind randomized controlled trial of management of recurrent nosebleeds in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140(5):670–674

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Logan JK, Pantle H (2016) Role of topical tranexamic acid in the management of idiopathic anterior epistaxis in adult patients in the emergency department. Am J Health Syst Pharm 73(21):1755–1759

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zahed R, Mousavi Jazayeri MH, Naderi A, Naderpour Z, Saeedi M (2018) Topical tranexamic acid compared with anterior nasal packing for treatment of epistaxis in patients taking antiplatelet drugs: randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med 25(3):261–266

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gottlieb M, DeMott JM, Peksa GD (2019) Topical tranexamic acid for the treatment of acute epistaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Pharmacother 53(6):652–657

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Whitworth K, Johnson J, Wisniewski S, Schrader M (2020) Data on the hemostasis in epistaxis with topically administered txa versus topical oxymetazoline spray. Data Brief 29:105283

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zahed R, Moharamzadeh P, Alizadeharasi S, Ghasemi A, Saeedi M (2013) A new and rapid method for epistaxis treatment using injectable form of tranexamic acid topically: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Emerg Med 31(9):1389–1392

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Joseph J, Martinez-Devesa P, Bellorini J, Burton MJ (2018) Tranexamic acid for patients with nasal haemorrhage (epistaxis). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD004328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Janapala RN, Tran QK, Patel J, Mehta E, Pourmand A (2022) Efficacy of topical tranexamic acid in epistaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med 51:169–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hilton L, Reuben A (2014) Best evidence topic reports. BET 3: topical intranasal tranexamic acid for spontaneous epistaxis. Emerg Med J 31(5):436–437

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Reuben A, Appelboam A, Stevens KN, Vickery J, Ewings P, Ingram W et al (2021) The use of tranexamic acid to reduce the need for nasal packing in epistaxis (NoPAC): randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 77(6):631–640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fox H, Hunter F (2015) BET 1: intravenous tranexamic acid in the treatment of acute epistaxis. Emerg Med J 32(12):969–970

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yüksel A, Kurtaran H, Kankiliç ES, Ark N, Uğur KS, Gündüz M (2014) Epistaxis in geriatric patients. Turk J Med Sci 44(1):133–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sethi RKV, Kozin ED, Abt NB, Bergmark R, Gray ST (2018) Treatment disparities in the management of epistaxis in United States emergency departments. Laryngoscope 128(2):356–362

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang J, Cai C, Wang S (2014) Merocel versus nasopore for nasal packing: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 9(4):e93959

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Iqbal IZ, Jones GH, Dawe N, Mamais C, Smith ME, Williams RJ et al (2017) Intranasal packs and haemostatic agents for the management of adult epistaxis: systematic review. J Laryngol Otol 131(12):1065–1092

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yau S (2015) An update on epistaxis. Aust Fam Physician 44(9):653–656

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Badran K, Malik TH, Belloso A, Timms MS (2005) Randomized controlled trial comparing merocel and rapidrhino packing in the management of anterior epistaxis. Clin Otolaryngol 30(4):333–337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Moumoulidis I, Draper MR, Patel H, Jani P, Price T (2006) A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing merocel and rapid rhino nasal tampons in the treatment of epistaxis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263(8):719–722

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Richardson C, Abrol A, Cabrera CI, Goldstein J, Maronian N, Rodriguez K et al (2021) The power of a checklist: Decrease in emergency department epistaxis transfers after clinical care pathway implementation. Am J Otolaryngol 42(4):102941

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kilty SJ, Al-Hajry M, Al-Mutairi D, Bonaparte JP, Duval M, Hwang E et al (2014) Prospective clinical trial of gelatin-thrombin matrix as first line treatment of posterior epistaxis. Laryngoscope 124(1):38–42

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Milinis K, Swords C, Hardman JC, Slovick A, Hutson K, Kuhn I et al (2021) Dissolvable intranasal haemostatic agents for acute epistaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 46(3):485–493

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gurdeep S, Harvinder S, Philip R, Amanjit K (2006) Intranasal use of quickclot in a patient with uncontrollable epistaxis. Med J Malays 61(1):112–113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Shikani AH, Chahine KA, Alqudah MA (2011) Endoscopically guided chitosan nasal packing for intractable epistaxis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 25(1):61–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Valentine R, Athanasiadis T, Moratti S, Hanton L, Robinson S, Wormald PJ (2010) The efficacy of a novel chitosan gel on hemostasis and wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 24(1):70–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mathiasen RA, Cruz RM (2005) Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a novel matrix hemostatic sealant in patients with acute anterior epistaxis. Laryngoscope 115(5):899–902

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cho KS, Park CH, Hong SL, Kim MJ, Kim JY, Kim YW et al (2015) Comparative analysis of Cutanplast and Spongostan nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272(7):1699–1705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Riviello R, Brown A (2010) Otolaryngologic procedures. In: Roberts J, Hedges J (eds) Clinical procedures in emergency medicine, 5th edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1204–1207

    Google Scholar 

  46. Novoa E, Schlegel-Wagner C (2012) Hot water irrigation as treatment for intractable posterior epistaxis in an out-patient setting. J Laryngol Otol 126(1):58–60

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vis E, van den Berge H (2011) Treatment of epistaxis without the use of nasal packing, a patient study. Rhinology 49(5):600–604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Schwartzbauer HR, Shete M, Tami TA (2003) Endoscopic anatomy of the sphenopalatine and posterior nasal arteries: implications for the endoscopic management of epistaxis. Am J Rhinol 17(1):63–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nouraei SA, Maani T, Hajioff D, Saleh HA, Mackay IS (2007) Outcome of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery occlusion for intractable epistaxis: a 10-year experience. Laryngoscope 117(8):1452–1456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kumar S, Shetty A, Rockey J, Nilssen E (2003) Contemporary surgical treatment of epistaxis. What is the evidence for sphenopalatine artery ligation. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 28(4):360–363

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kitamura T, Takenaka Y, Takeda K, Oya R, Ashida N, Shimizu K et al (2019) Sphenopalatine artery surgery for refractory idiopathic epistaxis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 129(8):1731–1736

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pádua FG, Voegels RL (2008) Severe posterior epistaxis-endoscopic surgical anatomy. Laryngoscope 118(1):156–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Asanau A, Timoshenko AP, Vercherin P, Martin C, Prades JM (2009) Sphenopalatine and anterior ethmoidal artery ligation for severe epistaxis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 118(9):639–644

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kamani T, Shaw S, Ali A, Manjaly G, Jeffree M (2007) Sphenopalatine-sphenopalatine anastomosis: a unique cause of intractable epistaxis, safely treated with microcatheter embolization: a case report. J Med Case Rep 1:125

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Camp AA, Dutton JM, Caldarelli DD (2009) Endoscopic transnasal transethmoid ligation of the anterior ethmoid artery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23(2):200–202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Selcuk H, Soylu N, Albayram S, Selcuk D, Ozer H, Kocer N et al (2005) Endovascular treatment of persistent epistaxis due to pseudoaneurysm formation of the ophthalmic artery secondary to nasogastric tube. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28(2):242–245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Krajina A, Chrobok V (2014) Radiological diagnosis and management of epistaxis. Cardiovasc Interven Radiol 37(1):26–36

    Google Scholar 

  58. Swords C, Patel A, Smith ME, Williams RJ, Kuhn I, Hopkins C (2017) Surgical and interventional radiological management of adult epistaxis: systematic review. J Laryngol Otol 131(12):1108–1130

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hoffman H, Ashok Kumar A, Raventhiranathan N, Masoud HE, Gould GC (2023) Endovascular embolization for the treatment of epistaxis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Interv Neuroradiol. https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199221081715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Christensen NP, Smith DS, Barnwell SL, Wax MK (2005) Arterial embolization in the management of posterior epistaxis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133(5):748–753

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Vokes DE, McIvor NP, Wattie WJ, Chaplin JM, Morton RP (2004) Endovascular treatment of epistaxis. ANZ J Surg 74(9):751–753

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Klotz DA, Winkle MR, Richmon J, Hengerer AS (2002) Surgical management of posterior epistaxis: a changing paradigm. Laryngoscope 112(9):1577–1582

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stylianos Mylonas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors that they have no conflict of interst.

Human or Animal Rights Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent

Not Applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mylonas, S., Skoulakis, C., Nikolaidis, V. et al. Epistaxis Treatment Options: Literature Review. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 75, 2235–2244 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03824-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03824-z

Keywords

Navigation