Skip to main content
Log in

Interlay Type-1 Tympanoplasty with or Without Cortical Mastoidectomy in an Inactive Mucosal Chronic Otitis Media with Large Central Perforation: A Retrospective Comparative Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Chronic otitis media (COM) is a pathology involving the middle ear cleft characterized by discharging ear and a non-healing perforation in tympanic membrane. Different techniques have been used for closing the perforation but interlay myringoplasty has become popular among surgeons since the past few decades. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the success rate of Type-1 interlay tympanoplasty in large tympanic membrane perforation with or without cortical mastoidectomy in terms of graft take-up rate and improvement in hearing outcomes. Materials and methods: A retrospective study for the period of eighteen months with total of 90 patients further subdivided into two groups. Group I of 45 patients underwent Type-1 interlay tympanoplasty alone, and 45 patients in Group II underwent type-1 interlay tympanoplasty with cortical mastoidectomy. Results: In group I the mean pre-operative, post-operative pure tone average and air bone gap was found to be 36.49 ± 4.49, 29.24 ± 4.39 and 25.11 ± 3.15, 14.76 ± 3.12 respectively. In group II the mean pre-operative, post-operative pure tone average and air bone gap was found to be 35.60 ± 5.27, 25.96 ± 5.29 and 23.96 ± 3.76 and 13.33 ± 3.38. An independent sample t-test was performed for intergroup comparison and found to be statistically significant (p < 0.005). The graft uptake was 95.5% in group II and 82.2% in group I. Conclusion: Interlay type-1 tympanoplasty coupled with cortical mastoidectomy gives excellent results in terms air bone gap closure and graft uptake in inactive mucosal COM than Interlay type-1 tympanoplasty alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kadah SM, Mokhemar SM, Ibrahim H, Ibrahim HE (2019 Apr) Impact of mastoidectomy on tympanoplasty for recurrent suppurative otitis media. Egypt J Otolaryngol 35(2):168–172

  2. Paparella MM, Abdelhammid MM, Schachern PA, Sahni R, Yoon TH, da Costa SS (1990 Jun) Otopathologic correlates of the continuum of otitis media. Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology 99(6suppl):17–22

  3. Rajneesh DV, Pawar S, Doddamani AK (2021 Jan) Outcome of underlay versus interlay tympanoplasty in patients with inactive mucosal chronic otitis media with large central perforation: a retrospective comparative study. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 7(1):121

  4. Alleva M, Paparella MM, Morris MS, da Costa SS (1989) The flexible/intact-bridge tympanomastoidectomy technique. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. Feb 1;22(1):41 – 9

  5. Jackler RK, Schindler RA (1984 Aug) Role of the mastoid in tympanic membrane reconstruction. Laryngoscope 94(4):495–500

  6. Mishiro Y, Sakagami M, Takahashi Y, Kitahara T, Kajikawa H, Kubo T (2001 Jan) Tympanoplasty with and without mastoidectomy for non-cholesteatomatous chronic otitis media. European archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology. 258:13–15

  7. Agrawal A, Bhargava P (2017 Jun) Comparative evaluation of tympanoplasty with or without mastoidectomy in treatment of chronic suppurative otitis media tubotympanic type. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 69:172–175

  8. World Health Organization. Chronic suppurative otitis media: burden of illness and management options

  9. Sergi B, Galli J, De Corso E, Parrilla C, Paludetti G (2011 Dec) Overlay versus underlay myringoplasty: report of outcomes considering closure of perforation and hearing function. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 31(6):366

  10. Patil BC, Misale PR, Mane RS, Mohite AA (2014 Dec) Outcome of interlay grafting in type 1 tympanoplasty for large central perforation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 66:418–424

  11. Kawatra R, Maheshwari P, Kumar G (2014) A comparative study of the techniques of myringoplasty–overlay, underlay & interlay. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 13(12):12–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jain S, Gupta N, Gupta R, Roy A (2017) Interlay Type I tympanoplasty in large central perforations: Analysis of 500 cases. Indian Journal of Otology. Jan 1;23(1):32

  13. Komune S, Wakizono S, Hisashi K, Uemura T Interlay method for myringoplasty.Auris Nasus Larynx. 1992 Jan1;19(1):17–22

  14. Hay A, Blanshard J (2014) The anterior interlay myringoplasty: outcome and hearing results in anterior and subtotal tympanic membrane perforations. Otology & Neurotology. Oct 1;35(9):1569-76

  15. Holmquist J, Bergström B The mastoid air cell system in ear surgery. Archives of Otolaryngology. 1978 Mar 1;104(3):127-9

  16. Balyan FR, Celikkanat S, Asian A, Taibah A, Russo A, Sanna M (1997) Mastoidectomy in noncholesteatomatous chronic suppurative otitis media: is it necessary?. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. Dec;117(6):592-5

  17. Chavan SS, Desmukh SD, Pawar VG (2011) Tympanoplasty with or without cortical mastoidectomy. Gujrat Med J 8(1):8–10

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma A, Baisakhiya N, Garg LN, Singh G (2016 Dec) Evaluation of role of mastoid surgery in the management of safe chronic suppurative otitis media. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 68:434–440

  19. Nayak DR, Balakrishnan R, Hazarika P, Mathew PT Role of cortical masteoidectomy in the results of myringoplasty for dry tubotympanic disease. Indian journal of Otology. 2003 Dec 1;9(4):11 – 5

Download references

Funding

NIL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Gaurav Kumar, Sanchit Bajpai, Brig. Deshpal.

Draft Preperation: Sanchit Bajpai, Gaurav Kumar, Saurabh Kumar Jaiswal, Rahul Dashrath Kanojia.

Draft Review: Gaurav Kumar, Brig. Deshpal.

Draft Editing: Sanchit Bajpai, Rahul Kanojia, Saurabh Kumar Jaiswal.

Validation: Gaurav Kumar, Brig. Deshpal, Sanchit Bajpai.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaurav Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

NIL.

Declaration by Authors

We confirm that:

This manuscript is original and has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal.

All authors have contributed significantly to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data. All the authors have given final approval of the version to be published and are accountable for all aspects of work in ensuring that questions related to accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Financial Support

None.

Funding Acquisition

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bajpai, S., Kumar, G., Kanojia, R.D. et al. Interlay Type-1 Tympanoplasty with or Without Cortical Mastoidectomy in an Inactive Mucosal Chronic Otitis Media with Large Central Perforation: A Retrospective Comparative Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 75, 2100–2106 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03781-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03781-7

Keywords

Navigation