Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Electromagnetic Radiation from Mobile Phones on Auditory Brainstem Response

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mobile phones are being used by around 70% of the global population. A simple non-invasive procedure to detect early impairment of the acoustic nerve and auditory pathway is by auditory brainstem response (ABR). It’s a response to the sound stimulus generated from the brainstem in the form of electrical impulses. To determine the effect of long-term usage of mobile phones on auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). This Epidemiological, cross-sectional study was undertaken at a tertiary care hospital and includes 865 individuals aged between 18 to 45 years using mobile phone for > 2 years. Users were categorized into various groups according to the minutes of mobile usage per day, years of mobile usage and total duration of mobile phone use in dominant (mobile using) and non-Dominant (non-mobile using) ears. The changes in ABR were studied in each ear to ascertain the effect of EMF exposure due to chronic mobile phone use. Mean age of subjects was 27.01 years. (M: F = 1.57:1.0). Range of mobile phone usage was from 4 to 900 min/day, with mean as 85.94 min/day. No significant differences were seen between dominant and non-dominant ears in regard to amplitudes of wave I, III and V, latencies of wave I and V and Inter peak latency (IPL) of wave I–III, III–V and I–V. No statistically significant difference for I–III, III–V and I–V IPL were found b/w two groups/ears except for usage of mobile phone for > 180 min/day in wave I–V, usage for 0–4 years in wave I–III and I–V and net hours usage for > 1500 h in wave I–V. The mean IPL in all the waves increases with the increase in years of mobile usage and is maximum in all waves in > 12 years mobile users. The long-term exposure to EMF does induce measurable changes in ABRs. Amplitude and IPLs of ABR were found comparable between the dominant and non-dominant ears using mobile phones, except for those using mobile usage for > 180 min/day and with increasing years of usage of mobile phone. Therefore, prudent use of mobile phone should be encouraged for a shorter period of time and for essential purpose only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health organization (2011). Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile phones.

  2. B S Human exposure to electromagnetic fields from mobile phones (1999). In: Proceedings of the 4th International conference on telecommunications in modern satellite, cable and broadcasting services. pp 1:222–31

  3. Varshney S (2016) Deafness in India. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 22:73–76

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ, Ahlbom A, Auvinen A, Blaasaas KG, Cardis E (2005) Mobile phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma: results of interphone case-control study in five North European countries. Br J Cancer 93:842–848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwon MS, Hämäläinen H (2011) Effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields: critical evaluation of behavioral and neurophysiological studies. Bioelectromagnetics 32(4):253–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Panda NK, Modi R, Munjal S, Virk RS (2011) Auditory changes in mobile users: is evidence forthcoming? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 144(4):581–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kellenyi L, Thuroczy G, Faludy BLL (1999) Effects of mobile GSM radiotelephone exposure on the auditory brainstem response (ABR). Neurobiology 7(1):79–81

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arai N, Enomoto H, Okabe S, Yuasa K, Kamimura YUY (2003) Thirty minutes mobile phone use has no short-term adverse effects on central auditory pathways. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1390–1394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerekhanjanarong V, Supiyaphun P, Naratricoon JLP (2005) The effect of mobile phone to audiologic system. J Med Assoc Thai 4:231–234

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aran JM, Carrere N, Chalan Y, Dulou PE, Larrieu S, Letenneur L, Veyret BDD (2004) Effects of exposure of the ear to GSM microwaves: in vivo and in vitro experimental studies. Int J Audiol 43(9):545–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Celiker M, Özgür A, Tümkaya L, Terzi S, Yılmaz M, Kalkan Y et al (2017) Effects of exposure to 2100 MHz GSM-like radiofrequency electromagnetic field on auditory system of rats. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 83:691–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khavanin A, Najfi P, Rezaee A, Bakhtou H, Akbari M (2007) Effect of mobile phone system (GSM-900) on the rabbit hearing with auditory brainstem response. J Biol Sci 7(1):200–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khavanin A, Najfi P, Rezaee A, Bakhtou HAM (2007) Effects of mobile system (GSM-900) on the rabbit hearing with aauditory brainstem response. J Biol Sci 7(1):200–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaprana AE, Chimona TS, Papadakis CE, Velegrakis SG, Vardiambasis IO, Adamidis G, Velegrakis GA (2011) Auditory brainstem response changes during exposure to GSM-900 radia_tion: an experimental study. Audiol Neurootol 16(4):270–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwon MS, Jääskeläinen SK, Toivo T, Hämäläinen H (2010) No effects of mobile phone electromagnetic field on auditory brain_stem response. Bioelectromagnetics 31(1):48–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bak M, Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Zmyslony M, Dudarewicz A (2013) No effects of acute exposure to the electromagnetic field emitted by mobile phones on brainstem auditory potentials in young volunteers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 16(3):201–208

    Google Scholar 

  17. Parazzini M, Tognola G, Franzoni C, Grandori FRP (2007) Modeling of the internal fields distribution in human inner hearing system exposed to 900 and 1800 MHz. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54:39–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oysu C, Topak M, Celik O, Yilmaz HBSA (2005) Effects of the acute exposure to the electromagnetic field of mobile phones on human auditory brainstem responses. Eur Arch Otorhinolarynogol 262:839–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mora R (2006) A study of the effects of cellular telephone microwave radiation on the auditory system in healthy men. Ear Nose Throat J 85(3):160,162-160163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stefanics G, Kellényi L, Molnár F, Kubinyi G, Thuróczy GHI (2007) Short GSM mobile phone exposure does not alter human auditory brainstem response. BMC Public Health 12(7):325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Parazzini M, Brazzale AR, Paglialonga A, Tognola G, Collet L, Moulin L, Lutman ME, Bell SL, Thomas NA, Uloziene I, Uloza V, Thuroczy G, Tavartkiladze G, Tsalighopoulo M, Ravazzani P (2007) Effects of GSM cellular phones on human hearing: the European project “GUARD.” Radiat Res 168(5):608–613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kellenyi L, Thuroczy GY, Faludy BLL (1999) Effects of mobile GSM radiotelephone exposure on the auditory brainstem response. Neurobiology 7:79–81

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh K (2015) Effect of electromagnetic waves emitted from mobile phone on brain stem auditory evoked potential in adult males. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 59(4):402–406

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Malla U, Limbu N, Das A, Paudel BH, Mathur N, Singh P (2012) Effects of electromagnetic waves emitted from mobile phone on auditory evoked potential in school children. Pediatr Res 16(1):37–41

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ruchi Kothari AK, Bokariya P (2020) Study of Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry in medical students having long time mobile usage. Indian J Otol 20(1):20–26

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta N, Goyal D, Sharma R, Arora KS (2015) Effect of prolonged use of mobile phone on brainstem auditory evoked potentials. J Clin Diagn Res 9(5):CC07-9

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sevi EC, Kumar PSMY (2014) Assessment of auditory evoked potential in long-term mobile phone users. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 58:437–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ramya CS, Karthiyanee KVS (2011) Effect of mobile phone usage on hearing threshold: a pilot study. Indian J Otol 17:159–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Paglialonga A, Tognola G, Parazzini M, Lutman ME, Bell SL, Thuroczy G, Ravazzani P (2007) Effects of mobile phone exposure on time frequency fine structure of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 122(4):2174–2182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sievert U, Eggert S (2005) PHC mobile phone emissions affect auditory functions of cochlea or brain stem? OHNS 2005;132:451–455. Can mobile phone emissions affect auditory functions of cochlea or brain stem? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:451–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Oktay MFDS (2006) Effects of intensive and moderate cellular phone use on hearing function. Electromagn Biol Med 25(1):13–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Davidson HCLM (2007) Survey of mobile phone use and their chronic effects on the hearing of a student population. Int J Audiol 46(3):113–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sievert U, Eggert S, Goltz SPH (2007) Effects of electromagnetic fields emitted by cellular phone on auditory and vestibular labyrinth. Laryngorhinootologie 86(4):264–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Maha Ahmed AE (2019) Effects on auditory function of chronic exposure to electromagnetic fields from mobile phones. Sohag Med J 23(2):18–23

    Google Scholar 

  35. Khullar S, Sood A, Sood S (2013) Auditory brainstem responses and EMFs Generated by mobile phones. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 65(3):S645–S649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Augner C, Gnambs T, Winker RBA (2012) Acute effects of electromagnetic fields emitted by GSM mobile phones on sub_jective well-being and physiological reactions: a meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ 424:11–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Selvi EC, Kumar PS, Mariam Y (2014) Assessment of auditory evoked potential in long term mobile phone users. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 58(4):437–440

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ranjan R, Ranjan M, Kumar R (2014) In preliminary data, cell phone users have longer ABR latencies. Hear J 67(3):34–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Karthikeyan P, Christian JSAA (2014) Hearing evaluation in mobile phone users at a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Otol 20:24–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sharma G, Agarwal DK, Hasan SACS (2016) Assessment long term effect of mobile phone usage on hearing faculties using brainstem evoked response audiometry. J Neurol Neurophysiol 7:387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lohitashwa R, Soumya BADD (2019) A cross sectional study of effects of mobile phone exposure on Brainstem evoked response audiometry (BERA). Indian J Clin Anat Physiol 6(2):205–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bhagat S, Varshney S, Bist SS, Goel D, Mishra S, Jha VK (2016) Effects on auditory function of chronic exposure to electromagnetic fields from mobile phones. Ear Nose Throat J 95(8):E18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

SERB-Science & Engineering Research Board. The study has been conducted by extramural grant provided by SERB ‘‘Effect of EMF radiation on auditory system of mobile users’’ under possible impact of EMF radiations exposure from mobile phones and handsets in life initiatives: Government of India. The study has been conducted at institute of my previous assignment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SV: Conception, Design, Supervision, Funding, Material collection, Data collection and/or processing, Analysis and/or interpretation, Literature review, Writing, Critical review. SA: Design, Material collection, Data collection and/or processing, Analysis and/or interpretation, Literature review, Writing. PA: Conception, Design, Supervision, Analysis and/or interpretation, Critical review. SS: Conception, Design, Supervision, Analysis and/or interpretation, Critical review. NK: Design, Material collection, Data collection and/or processing, Analysis and/or interpretation. KSBSS: Design, Data collection and/or processing, Analysis and/or interpretation. PA: Design, Data collection and/or processing, Analysis and/or interpretation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saurabh Varshney.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Varshney, S., Angral, S., Aggarwal, P. et al. Effect of Electromagnetic Radiation from Mobile Phones on Auditory Brainstem Response. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 75 (Suppl 1), 380–392 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03384-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03384-8

Keywords

Navigation