Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Study of Videolaryngostroboscopic Findings and Voice Handicap Index Before and After Treatment in Patients Presenting with Hoarseness Due to Non Malignant Lesions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Voice personifies an individual. Change in voice can be the only presentation for a benign malady like vocal nodule or acute laryngitis but can also indicate life threatening malignancy. Hence every voice change must be evaluated. The aim of this pioneering study was to assess patients with voice change due to non-malignant conditions, using Videolaryngostroboscopy (VLS) and Voice Handicap Index (VHI) pre and post1 month therapy. Diagnosis determined conservative therapy or Co2 laser phonosurgery according to accepted medical protocol. On VLS, glottic closure pattern and wave form was noted both before and after treatment. Patient completed VHI form before and after treatment. There is no previous study comparing pre and post treatment VHI and VLS in a extensive etiology of conservatively managed patients. In our study, 100 patients were enrolled in the age group between 10 years to the eighties, with majority in their thirties. The male to female ratio was 1.9:1. The majority of patients belonged to level IV occupation. A wide gamut of diagnosis was noted, majority being vocal nodules, followed by polyps, cysts, vocal cord palsy etc. A statistically significant improvement was seen pre and post treatment VLS in glottic closure pattern, waves presence along with improvement in VHI. Thus, Voice Handicap Index and Videostroboscopy can be used to prognosticate the vocal cord lesions and measure the effectiveness of treatment in both surgically and conservatively managed patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baitha S, Raizada RM, Singh AK, Puttewar MP, Chaturvedi VN (2002) Clinical profile of hoarseness of voice. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 54(1):14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Feierabend RH, Malik SN (2009) Hoarseness in adults. Am Fam Physician 80(4):363–370

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bastian RW, Levine LA (1988) Visual methods for the office diagnosis of voice disorders. Ear Nose, Throat J 67:363–79

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hirano M, Bless DM (1993) Videostroboscopic examination of larynx. Singular publishing group, San Diego, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cranen B, De Jong F (2000) Laryngostroboscopy. In: Kent RD, Ball MJ (eds), 257–84

  6. Yilmaz T (2012) Sulcus vocalis: excision, primary suture and medicalization laryngoplasty: personal experience with 44 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(11):2381–2389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hallen L, Testad P, Sederholm E, Dahlqvist A, Laurent C (2001) DiHA (dextranomers in hyaluronan) injections for treatment of insufficient closure of the vocal folds: early clinical experiences. Laryngoscope 111(6):1063–1067

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McGlashan JA (2019) Evaluation of voice. Chap. 62. In: Watkinson JC, Clark RW, ed. Scott Brown's Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 8th Ed. Florida: CRC Press 3 925–41

  9. Sasindran V, Moosankutty S, Mathew N, George NS (2019) Study of pre and post- operative videostroboscopic evaluation of benign vocal cord lesions. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71(Suppl 1):333–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma K, Sachdeva R, Duggal KK, Kahlon SK (2006) Direct laryngoscopic observations in progressive hoarseness of voice. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 58(4):364–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pal KS, Kaushal AK, Nagpure PS, Agarwal G (2014) Etiopathological study of 100 patients of hoarseness of voice: in a rural based hospital. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 66(1):40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zabret M, HočevarBoltežar I, Šereg BM (2018) The importance of the occupational vocal load for the occurence and treatment of organic voice disorders. Zdr Varst 57(1):17–24

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sellapampatti DV, Radhakrishnan S, Harshidan D (2014) Assessment of malignant and non-malignant lesions of the vocal cord using videostroboscopy. Trop J Med Res 17:99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sureshkumar S, Menon U (2018) Comparision of voice handicap index scores and treatment outcomes between professional and non-professional voive users with hoarseness. Int J Phonosurgery Laryngol 8(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The patient enrolled in the study underwent the investigations and procedure as charges laid down by the institution previously. No additional investigation were done specifically for the requirement of study, so there were no additional financial burden on the patient or institution. All the material used for collecting the data and other expenses related to the study were wore by the investigator. The study was not funded by any pharmaceutical company or institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhik Sikdar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors bear any conflicts of interest in the matter published in this research article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Itigi, S., Sikdar, A., Phatak, S. et al. Comparative Study of Videolaryngostroboscopic Findings and Voice Handicap Index Before and After Treatment in Patients Presenting with Hoarseness Due to Non Malignant Lesions. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74 (Suppl 3), 5160–5168 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-03047-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-03047-0

Keywords

Navigation