Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Alterations in Smell During Pregnancy: Myth or Fact?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To compare the olfactory functions of pregnant and non pregnant females draining the tribal tertiary care centre. Odor identification (OI), odor discrimination (OD) and odor threshold (OT) in subjects and control group with no previous Sino-nasal symptoms or pathology were included in the study. Mean scores of all the parameters were calculated in both the groups. Group A being of 60 pregnant females in 1st trimester and Group B constituted 60 non pregnant females as control group. Both the groups were matched for Age and Normal Mucociliary clearance range. Modified Indian Smell Identification Kit was used to assess all parameters. Before doing objective olfactory assessment all the study participants were given questionnaire for subjective assessment of olfaction in which we found significant impairment in drinking beverage and fragrance perception of flowers in pregnant females compared to non pregnant females. We also found there was no significant difference in mean scores of various olfactory parameters in multigravida and non pregnant females. The mean OI score in both groups was 9.54 ± 1.87 and 8.70 ± 1.62 respectively. Mean OD score of the two groups was 8.80 ± 2.61 and 9.80 ± 2.61 respectively and the mean OT score of both the groups was 6.99 ± 4.63 and 4.13 ± 2.48 respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Savović S, Nincić D, Lemajić S, Pilija V, Mandić A, Rajović J, Ivetić V (Sep–Oct 2002) Olfactory perception in women with physiologically altered hormonal status (during pregnancy and menopause). Med Pregl 55(9–10):380–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E Leslie Cameron. Pregnancy and olfaction: a review. Review article February 2014; vol 5: Article 67. www.frontiersin.org

  3. Croy I, Landis BN, Meusel T, Seo HS, Krone F, Hummel T (2011) Patient adjustment to reduced olfactory function. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:377–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hummel T, Barz S, Pauli E, Kobal G (1998) Chemosensory event-related potentials change with age. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:208–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nordin S, Murphy C, Davidson TM, Quinonez C, Jalowayski AA, Ellison DW (1996) Prevalence and assessment of qualitative olfactory dysfunction in different age groups. Laryngoscope 106:739–744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A (2007) Normative data for the “sniffin sticks” including tests of odour identification, odour discrimination and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:237–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miwa T, Furukawa M, Tsukatani T, Costanzo RM, Dinardo LJ, Reiter ER (2001) Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:497–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Demarquay G, Royet JP, Giraud P, Chazot G, Valade D, Ryvlin P (2006) Rating of olfactory judgements in migraine patients. Cephalalgia 26:1123–1130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kölble N, Hummel T, von Mering R, Huch A, Huch R (2001) Gustatory and olfactory function in the first trimester of pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 99:179–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00408-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilbert AN, Wysocki CJ (1991) Quantitative assessment of olfactory experience during pregnancy. Psychosom Med 53:693–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded by anyone.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shalini Jadia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Leena Jain, N.K. Vashisht, Shalini Jadia, Pooja Nayak, Manish Jain declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jain, L., Vashisht, N.K., Jadia, S. et al. Alterations in Smell During Pregnancy: Myth or Fact?. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74, 146–149 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-02243-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-02243-8

Keywords

Navigation