Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Economic Disadvantage Among Older People in Rural Indonesia: Risk and Protective Factors

  • Published:
Journal of Population Ageing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little research attention has been given to investigative inequalities in the economic wellbeing of older persons in rural Indonesia. This paper aims to investigate factors contributing to the level of the economic disadvantage of older persons and the influence of financial support from adult children in relieving old-age poverty. Data are drawn from the 2016 Ageing in Rural Indonesian Study (ARIS). The sample size was 1,629 respondents collected from six villages across Indonesia. Using a multidimensional economic disadvantage measure, we found that 12% of older persons in the study sites have economic disadvantage. Risk factors of economic disadvantage include being female, having non-migrant children only, no children, and having a disability. Protective factors against possible economic disadvantage include having a pension, a higher education level, and remaining economically active. Children’s financial support are very limited in preventing poverty and as a main source of income in old age. Therefore, there is a need not to rely on children’s financial support for older persons but to develop and provide a more sustainable support system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abikusno, N. (2007). Older population in Indonesia: trends, issues and policy responses. UNFPA Indonesia and Country Technical Services Team for East and South-East Asia.

  • Adioetomo, S. M., & Mujahid, G. (2014). Indonesia on the threshold of population ageing. Jakarta, Indonesia: United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Indonesia.

  • Adioetomo, S. M., Howell, F., McPherson, A., & Priebe, J. (2014). Fighting Old-Age Poverty: ASLUT’s Role,. Retrieved from Jakarta

  • Ananta, A., & Arifin, E. N. (2009). Older persons in Southeast Asia: from liability to asset. Older persons in Southeast Asia: an emerging asset (pp. 3–46). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

  • Arifin, E. N., & Ananta, A. (2016). The past three population censuses: a deepening ageing population in Indonesia. Contemporary demographic transformations in China, India and Indonesia (pp. 309–323). Springer.

  • Atwal, A., & McIntyre, A. (2013). Occupational therapy and older people. Wiley Online Library.

  • Barrientos, A. (2006). Cash transfers for older people reduce poverty and inequality. Background paper for the World Development Report.

  • Barrientos, A., Gorman, M., & Heslop, A. (2003). Old age poverty in developing countries: contributions and dependence in later life. World development, 31(3), 555–570.

  • BPS–Statistics. (2010). The Informal Sector and Informal Employment in Indonesia. In: Jakarta: BPS Statistics Indonesia.

  • BPS (2014). Statistik penduduk lanjut usia. Katalog BPS, 4104001.

  • BPS. (2019). Statistik Penduduk Lanjut Usia 2019. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.

  • BPS. (2020). Statistik Penduduk Lanjut Usia. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.

  • Cameron, L., & Suarez, D. C. (2017). Disability in Indonesia: what can we learn from the data. Australia Indonesia Partnership for Economic Governance. Monash University & Australian Government.

  • Cao, J., & Rammohan, A. (2016). Social capital and healthy ageing in Indonesia. Bmc Public Health, 16(1), 631.

  • Do-Le, K. D., Raharjo, Y., Graha–LIPI, W., & Subroto, F. J. G. (2002). Community-based support for the elderly in Indonesia: the case of PUSAKA. Southeast Asia’s Population In A Changing Asian Context,(June), 10–14.

  • Glass, T. A., De Leon, C. M., Marottoli, R. A., & Berkman, L. F. (1999). Population based study of social and productive activities as predictors of survival among elderly Americans. Bmj, 319(7208), 478–483.

  • Hurd, M. D. (1990). Research on the elderly: economic status, retirement, and consumption and saving. Journal of economic literature, 28(2), 565–637.

  • The welfare of elder persons (1998). 13 C.F.R.

  • Johar, M., & Maruyama, S. (2011). Intergenerational cohabitation in modern Indonesia: filial support and dependence. Health Economics, 20(S1), 87–104.

  • Jones, G. W. (2016). Ageing in China, India and Indonesia: an overview. Contemporary demographic transformations in China, India and Indonesia (pp. 325–328). Springer.

  • Ihromi, T. O. (1994). Inheritance and equal rights for Toba Batak daughters. Law and Society Review, 525–537.

  • Keasberry, I. N. (2001). Elder care and intergenerational relationships in rural Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Ageing & Society, 21(5), 641–665.

  • Kreager, P. (2006). Migration, social structure and old-age support networks: a comparison of three indonesian communities. Ageing & Society, 26(1), 37–60.

  • Kusumaningrum, D., Aidulsyah, F., & Meilianna, R. (2020). Tiga alasan mengapa Kartu Prakerja hanya memihak pada masyarakat perkotaan dan solusinya. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/tiga-alasan-mengapa-kartu-prakerja-hanya-memihak-pada-masyarakat-perkotaan-dan-solusinya-138425

  • McDonald, P., Son, V. B., Utomo, I. D., Utomo, A. J., & Hull, T. H. (2016). A Longitudinal Study of Poverty Among Young Adults in Greater Jakarta Between 2009–2010 and 2013–2014 Paper presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting.

  • Mujahid, G., Pannirselvam, J., & Dodge, B. (2008). The impact of social pensions: Perceptions of Asian older persons.

  • Muliati, I. (2013). Pension reform experience in Indonesia Paper presented at the World Bank, prepared for IMF conference “Designing Sustainable and Equitable Pension Systems in Asia in the Post Crisis World”, https://www.imf.org/external/np/seminars/eng/2013/oapfad/pdf/muliatippr.pdf

  • Priebe, J. (2018). Disability and its correlates in a developing country context: evidence from multiple datasets and measures. The Journal of Development Studies, 54(4), 657–681.

  • Priebe, J., & Howell, F. (2014). Old-age poverty in Indonesia: Empirical evidence and policy options. Retrieved from

  • Schröder-Butterfill, E., & Marianti, R. (2006). A framework for understanding old-age vulnerabilities. Ageing & Society, 26(1), 9–35.

  • Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: a survey of household resources and standards of living. Univ of California Press.

  • Ulil Absor, M., & Dwisetyani Utomo, I. (2017). School-to-work transition of young people in Greater Jakarta: the determinants of success. Asian Population Studies, 13(3), 306–326.

  • Utomo, A., Mcdonald, P., Utomo, I., Cahyadi, N., & Sparrow, R. (2019). Social engagement and the elderly in rural Indonesia. Social Science & Medicine, 229, 22–31.

  • Van Minh, H., Ng, N., Byass, P., & Wall, S. (2012). Patterns of subjective quality of life among older adults in rural Vietnam and Indonesia. Geriatrics & gerontology international, 12(3), 397–404.

  • Vos, R., Ganuza, E., Lofgren, H., Sánchez, M., & Díaz-Bonilla, C. (2008). Public policies for human development. United Nations Development Program (UNDP).

  • Witoelar, F. (2012). Household dynamics and living arrangements of the elderly in Indonesia: evidence from a longitudinal survey. Aging in Asia: findings from new and emerging data initiatives. National Academies Press (US).

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to acknowledge and thank to Professor Peter McDonald and Dr Iwu Dwisetyani Utomo who lead the project of “the 2016 Ageing in Rural Indonesian Survey (ARIS)” used in this paper. This paper is part of my PhD thesis funded by the Ministry of Religious Affairs (MORA) of the Republic of Indonesia through 5000 Doctorate Scholarship Program (Program Beasiswa 5000 Doktor). Lastly, this work was also supported by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (project number CE170100005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muh. Ulil Absor.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Statement

The compliance of this paper with ethical standards was approved by Human Research Ethics Committee the Australian National University (HREC ANU) number 2015/481 and 2016/280. This research has also obtained ethical approval from Indonesian Government at both national and local levels. This research involved human participation. However, the authors confirm that this research has obtained informed consent from all respondents and key informants. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. This paper also has not been published elsewhere, nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere. This manuscript will not be submitted elsewhere until the editorial process is completed.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Absor, M.U., McDonald, P. & Utomo, A. Economic Disadvantage Among Older People in Rural Indonesia: Risk and Protective Factors. Population Ageing 16, 919–937 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-022-09406-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-022-09406-1

Keywords

Navigation