Skip to main content
Log in

Why Rotational Living Is Bad for Older Adults? Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study in India

  • Published:
Journal of Population Ageing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the adverse impact of old age on their health, the vulnerable older adults tend to live with their adult children in a shared living arrangement. Since fewer children being available to care for and the traditional family-based care is becoming less common, the present study investigates what are the factors that lead to rotational living arrangement in later ages and examines the health outcomes of older adults who rotationally live with their adult children. Using data from Building Knowledge Base on Population Ageing in India (BKPAI), we employed bivariate and logistic regression on a sample of 4952 older adults to carve out the results. About 13.5% of the older adults were rotationally living in India. Rotationally living older adults were significantly more likely to have low psychological health [OR: 1.31, CI: 1.02–1.71] low subjective well-being [OR: 1.55, CI: 1.21–1.98] and poor self-rated health [OR: 1.56, CI: 1.26–1.23] than were constant stayers with a single child. While the feelings of care-giving burden often outweigh the support exchanges among children, the rotational living results in the worsening of health status among older adults. Thus, the attention must be paid to promote effective co-residence in old age with adult children on a shared basis without affecting their health through several polices and financial incentives. The adult children who take care of their older parents should be provided more assistance to ease their increased responsibility for caregiving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The concept was drafted by SS and MT; MT contributed to the analysis design; SS advised on the paper and assisted in paper conceptualization and SS and MT contributed in the comprehensive writing of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shobhit Srivastava.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Availability of Data

The study utilises secondary source of data which is freely available in public domain.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

The particular study is based on the secondary data which is freely available in public domain and thus author does not require any ethical clearance.

Consent to Publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muhammad, T., Srivastava, S. Why Rotational Living Is Bad for Older Adults? Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study in India. Population Ageing 15, 61–78 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-020-09312-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-020-09312-4

Keywords

Navigation