Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A National Analysis of the Spatial Patterns and Correlates of Evictions in the United States

  • Published:
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This national study investigates the spatial patterns and correlates of housing evictions in the U.S., a critical crisis of local and national significance. A national data set on county-level eviction rates was obtained from Princeton University’s Eviction Lab database, and the data on risk factors of eviction were acquired from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’s Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). First, we examined disparate patterns of evictions across U.S. counties, followed by a hot spot analysis to determine clusters of counties with significantly high or low values of eviction rates. The analysis concluded with multiple regression to investigate the associations of eviction rates and 15 CDC SVI indicators. Evictions are most prevalent in populous urban or metropolitan counties; however, eviction rates can be higher in less-populous suburban counties even nonmetropolitan communities. Clusters of counties with significantly high eviction rates (i.e., hot spots) were mainly concentrated in lower Michigan-upper Indiana and the along the east coast that spanned Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina. The spatial regression model explained a moderate degree of the variations of eviction rates and social vulnerability indicators including income, minority population, single-parent, unemployment rate, apartment living, and low education status were most helpful predictors of eviction. This national study can inform government resource allocation efforts where it provides new insights into the spatial disparities and potential contributing factors of eviction rates across U.S. counties, thus enhancing our understanding of the eviction crisis nationwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability Global environmental change, 16(3), 268–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (2005). Exploring spatial data with GeoDaTM: A workbook (pp. 165–223). Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science.

  • Anselin, L. (2009). Spatial regression. The SAGE handbook of spatial analysis (1 vol., pp. 255–276). Sage Publications.

  • Basu, S., & Thibodeau, T. G. (1998). Analysis of spatial autocorrelation in house prices. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17(1), 61–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benfer, E. A., Vlahov, D., Long, M. Y., Walker-Wells, E., Pottenger, J. L., Gonsalves, G., & Keene, D. E. (2021). Eviction, health inequity, and the spread of COVID-19: Housing policy as a primary pandemic mitigation strategy. Journal of Urban Health, 98, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bin, O. (2004). A prediction comparison of housing sales prices by parametric versus semi-parametric regressions. Journal of Housing Economics, 13(1), 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann, J. (2013). Indicators and criteria for measuring vulnerability: Theoretical bases and requirements. Teoksessa: Birkmann, Jörn (toim.) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies, 2. uusittu painos.

  • Carol, T., & Yi, G. (2021). Evictions and Suburban Poverty: Two Sides of the Same Coin. (2021, April 9). National League of Cities. Retrieved December 17, from https://www.nlc.org/article/2021/04/09/evictions-and-suburban-poverty-two-sides-of-the-same-coin/

  • Center for Disease Control (CDC) (2020). CDC SVI 2018 Documentation Retrieved December 17, 2021, from https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/documentation/pdf/SVI2018Documentation-H.pdf

  • Chum, A. (2015). The impact of gentrification on residential evictions. Urban Geography, 36(7), 1083–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colburn, G., & Allen, R. (2018). Rent burden and the great recession in the USA. Urban Studies, 55(1), 226–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C. (2019). Institutional racism and (in) justice: Australia in the 21st century. Decolonization of Criminology and Justice, 1(1), 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, M. (2012). Eviction and the reproduction of urban poverty. American Journal of Sociology, 118(1), 88–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, M. (2016). Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American city. Crown.

  • Desmond, M. (2022). Unaffordable America: Poverty, housing, and eviction: American Journal of sociology. The affordable housing reader (pp. 389–395). Routledge.

  • Desmond, M., & Gershenson, C. (2017). Who gets evicted? Assessing individual, neighborhood, and network factors. Social Science Research, 62, 362–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, M., An, W., Winkler, R., & Ferriss, T. (2013). Evicting children. Social Forces, 92(1), 303–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, M., Gromis, A., Edmonds, L., Hendrickson, J., Krywokulski, K., Leung, L., & Porton, A. (2018). Eviction Lab Methodology Report: Version 1.0. Retrieved December 17, 2021, from www.evictionlab.org/methods

  • Finger, D. (2019). The eviction geography of New Orleans: An empirical study to further housing justice. UDC/DCSL Law Review, 22, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, T. H. E. O. (2008). To be old, frail, and evicted: Patients at risk. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved July 10, 2023, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB121806702698918693

  • Frigerio, I., Ventura, S., Strigaro, D., Mattavelli, M., De Amicis, M., Mugnano, S., & Boffi, M. (2016). A GIS-based approach to identify the spatial variability of social vulnerability to seismic hazard in Italy. Applied Geography, 74, 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, H., & Roy, S. (2022). Optimization of United States Residential Real Estate Investment through Geospatial analysis and market timing (pp. 1–14). Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy.

  • Galster, G., Santiago, A., Lucero, J., & Cutsinger, J. (2016). Adolescent neighborhood context and young adult economic outcomes for low-income African Americans and Latinos. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(2), 471–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getis, A., & Ord, J. K. (1996). Local spatial statistics: An overview. In P. Longley, & M. Batty (Eds.), Spatial analysis: Modeling in a GIS environment (pp. 261–277). Wiley.

  • Goldstein, I., Dowdall, E., Weidig, C., Simmons, J., & Carney, B. (2019). Evictions in Philadelphia: A data & policy update. The Reinvestment Fund. Retrieved July 10, 2023, from https://www.reinvestment.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/ReinvestmentFund__PHL-Evictions-Brief-Oct-2019.pdf

  • Goodspeed, R., Benton, E., & Slugg, K. (2021). Eviction case filings and neighborhood characteristics in urban and rural places: A Michigan Statewide Analysis. Housing Policy Debate, 1–19.

  • Greenberg, D., Gershenson, C., & Desmond, M. (2016). Discrimination in evictions: Empirical evidence and legal challenges. Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review, 51, 115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gromis, A., & Desmond, M. (2021). Estimating the prevalence of eviction in the United States. Cityscape, 23(2), 279–290.

  • Harrison, A., & Immergluck, D. (2020). The Battle of the Belts: Comparing Housing Vacancy in Larger Metros in the Sun Belt and the Rust Belt since the Mortgage Crisis, 2012 to 2019. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/urban_studies_institute/47/ (Accessed on May 12, 2022).

  • Harrison, A., Immergluck, D., Ernsthausen, J., & Earl, S. (2021). Housing stability, evictions, and subsidized rental properties: Evidence from Metro Atlanta, Georgia. Housing Policy Debate, 31, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, C., & Robinson, D. (2003). Evictions: The hidden housing problem. Housing Policy Debate, 14(4), 461–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harville, E. W., Wallace, M. E., & Theall, K. P. (2022). Eviction as a social determinant of pregnancy health: County-level eviction rates and adverse birth outcomes in the United States. Health & Social Care in the Community.

  • Harwood, S., & Myers, D. (2002). The Dynamics of Immigration and local governance in Santa Ana: Neighborhood activism, overcrowding, and Land-Use Policy. Policy Studies Journal, 30(1), 70–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, P., Rutan, D. Q., & Desmond, M. (2022). Beyond Urban Displacement: Suburban Poverty and Eviction (p. 10780874221085676). Urban Affairs Review.

  • IMCA.org (IMCA) (2020). Evictions Outside the Central City. Retrieved December 17, 2021, from https://icma.org/articles/pm-magazine/evictions-outside-central-city

  • Immergluck, D., Ernsthausen, J., Earl, S., & Powell, A. (2020). Evictions, large owners, and serial filings: Findings from Atlanta. Housing Studies, 35(5), 903–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., Garcia, I., & Brewer, S. (2021). Spatial relationship between eviction filings, neighborhood characteristics, and proximity to the Central Business District: A case study of Salt Lake County, Utah. Housing Policy Debate, 31(3–5), 601–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehnhoff, A. (2010). Holding on to home: Preventing eviction and termination of tenant-based subsidies for Limited English proficiency tenants living in Housing units with HUD rental assistance. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy, 17, 221.

  • Lamb, Z., Shi, L., Silva, S., & Spicer, J. (2022). Resident-owned resilience. Can cooperative land ownership enable transformative climate adaptation for manufactured housing communities? Housing Policy Debate (pp. 1–23).

  • Laska, S., & Morrow, B. H. (2006). Social vulnerabilities and Hurricane Katrina: An unnatural disaster in New Orleans. Marine Technology Society Journal, 40(4), 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepczyk, C. A., Hammer, R. B., Stewart, S. I., & Radeloff, V. C. (2007). Spatiotemporal dynamics of housing growth hotspots in the North Central US from 1940 to 2000. Landscape Ecology, 22(6), 939–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I., & Donnelly, L. (2019). A research note on the prevalence of housing eviction among children born in US cities. Demography, 56(1), 391–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacTavish, K., Eley, M., & Salamon, S. (2006). Housing vulnerability among rural trailer-park households. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy, 13, 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcal, K., Fowler, P. J., & Hovmand, P. S. (2022). Feedback dynamics of the low-income rental housing market: exploring policy responses to COVID-19. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.12647.

  • Mazur, C. (2016). Homes on the range: Homeownership rates are higher in rural America. Retrieved July 10, 2023, from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2016/12/homes_on_the_range.html#:~:text=Compared%20with%20urban%20areas%2C%20where,areas%20than%20in%20urban%20areas

  • McElroy, E. (2018). Mapping the Anti-Eviction Struggle in the San Francisco Bay Area. This is not an Atlas (pp. 38–45). A Global Collection of Counter-Cartographies.

  • Merritt, B., & Farnworth, M. D. (2021). State landlord-tenant policy and eviction rates in majority-minority neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 31, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A. (1999). The ESRI guide to GIS analysis: Geographic patterns & relationships (1 vol.). ESRI, Inc.

  • Ngo, E. (2003). When disasters and age collide—reviewing vulnerability of the elderly. Natural Hazards Review, 2(2), 80–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niccolai, L. M., Kim, M., Blankenship, & Danya, E. (2019). Keene. “Eviction from renter-occupied households and rates of sexually transmitted infections: A county-level ecological analysis. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 46(1), 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ord, J. K., & Getis, A. (2001). Testing for local spatial autocorrelation in the presence of global autocorrelation. Journal of Regional Science, 41, 411–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papke, D. R. (2021). The stage was set for disaster: for-profit nursing homes, Federal Law, and COVID-19. Marquette Law School Legal Studies Paper, (21 – 06).

  • Pipal, W. (2012). You don’t have to Go Home but you can’t stay Here: The current state of federal nursing home Involuntary Discharge Laws. Elder Law Journal, 20, 235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramiller, A. (2021). Displacement through development? Property turnover and eviction risk in Seattle. Urban Studies, 59(6), 1148–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remus, D., & Garland, M. (2021). Access to Justice in the Age of COVID (19 vol.). Office of the Attorney General.

  • Robinson, D., & Steil, J. (2021). Eviction dynamics in market-rate multifamily rental housing. Housing Policy Debate, 31(3–5), 647–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Routhier, G. (2019). Beyond worst case needs: Measuring the breadth and severity of housing insecurity among urban renters. Housing Policy Debate, 29(2), 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (2017). Dis/possessive collectivism: Property and personhood at city’s end. Geoforum, 80, A1–A11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scally, C., Gilbert, B., Hedman, C., & Posey, A. G. L. (2018). Rental housing for a 21st Century Rural America. The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtlein, M. C., Shafer, J. M., Berry, M., & Cutter, S. L. (2011). Modeled earthquake losses and social vulnerability in Charleston, South Carolina. Applied Geography, 31(1), 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E., & Akers, J. (2021a). “Our customer is America”: Housing insecurity and eviction in Las Vegas, Nevada’s postcrisis rental markets. Housing Policy Debate, 31(3–5), 516–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E., & Akers, J. (2021b). Building the eviction economy: Speculation, precarity, and eviction in Detroit. Urban Affairs Review, 57(1), 35–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, K. (2008). A response to ‘The eviction of critical perspectives from gentrification research’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 192–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, T. (2006). The eviction of critical perspectives from gentrification research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(4), 737–757.

  • Sims, J. R. (2016). More than gentrification: Geographies of capitalist displacement in Los Angeles 1994–1999. Urban Geography, 37(1), 26–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (2008). On ‘the eviction of critical perspectives’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 195–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soederberg, S. (2018). Evictions: A global capitalist phenomenon. Development and Change, 49(2), 286–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielman, S. E., Tuccillo, J., Folch, D. C., Schweikert, A., Davies, R., Wood, N., & Tate, E. (2020). Evaluating social vulnerability indicators: Criteria and their application to the Social Vulnerability Index. Natural Hazards, 100(1), 417–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, E. (2017a). Dignity takings and trailer trash: The case of Mobile Home Park Mass Evictions. The University of Chicago Law Review, 92, 937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, E. (2017b). Displaced in place: Manufactured housing, mass eviction, and the paradox of state intervention. American Sociological Review, 82(2), 243–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teresa, B. (2018). The geography of eviction in Richmond: Beyond poverty. Retrieved December 17, 2021, from https://cura.vcu.edu/ongoing-projects/rva-eviction-lab

  • Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., & Schiller, A. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8074–8079.

  • Uitto, J. I. (1998). The geography of disaster vulnerability in megacities: A theoretical framework. Applied Geography, 18(1), 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (October 8, 2021). 2020 Census Group Quarters. Retrieved December 17, 2021, from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2021/03/2020-census-group-quarters.html

  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Office of Policy Development and Research (HUD) (2021). Getting Started with the Public Use File: 2015 and beyond. Retrieved December 17, 2021, from https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/programs-surveys/ahs/tech-documentation/2015/Getting%20Started%20with%20the%20AHS%20PUF%202015%20and%20Beyond.pdf

  • Voss, P. R., Long, D. D., Hammer, R. B., & Friedman, S. (2006). County child poverty rates in the US: A spatial regression approach. Population Research and Policy Review, 25(4), 369–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walks, A. (2013). Mapping the urban debtscape: The geography of household debt in canadian cities. Urban Geography, 34(2), 153–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. M., Madel, M. J., Mattson, D. J., Graham, J. M., Burchfield, J. A., & Belsky, J. M. (2005). Natural landscape features, human-related attractants, and conflict hotspots: A spatial analysis of human–grizzly bear conflicts. Ursus, 16(1), 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zewde, N., Eliason, E., Allen, H., & Gross, T. (2019). The effects of the ACA Medicaid expansion on nationwide home evictions and eviction-court initiations: United States, 2000–2016. American Journal of Public Health, 109(10), 1379–1383.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urban and Public Affairs, University of Louisville, 230 Urban and Public Affairs Building, 426 W Bloom St., Louisville, KY, 40208, USA

    Lindsey Connors & Charlie H. Zhang

  2. Department of Geographic and Environmental Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA

    Lindsey Connors & Charlie H. Zhang

Authors
  1. Lindsey Connors
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Charlie H. Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lindsey Connors.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Connors, L., Zhang, C.H. A National Analysis of the Spatial Patterns and Correlates of Evictions in the United States. Appl. Spatial Analysis 16, 1661–1682 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-023-09534-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-023-09534-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation