Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Determinants of Local Employment Growth in Spain

  • Published:
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 31 May 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

During the last two decades, the Spanish economy has been growing both in terms of employment and economic activity, and the spatial distribution of both is very uneven. At a high level of disaggregation, when observing figures of local employment growth we find major changes between 1991 and 2001 and 2001–2011 decades. The aim of this paper is to provide a better understanding of the main determinants of local employment growth in Spain, including socio-economic factors as well as the structural characteristics of the area. Using spatial auto-regressive models combined with incremental distances to different population size tiers, we account for the spatial relationship between areas and for the influence of the urban hierarchy. Our spatial units of analysis are Local Labor Markets, since they comprise workers and work places within the same functional region. Our results for Spain confirm how sensitive the empirical analysis is and how the direct and/or indirect effect of some structural and socioeconomic factors over local employment growth may vary along time. The two decades under study reflect two very different patterns of local growth, supporting the idea of designing a la carte local policies, which should be reassessed timely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 31 May 2018

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The maps on the right-hand side in Fig. 1 have the wrong titles. NUTS 2 regions should be Local Labour Markets.

Notes

  1. Local labor markets or LLMs are functional regions that internalize the travel-to-work daily movements. The use of this spatial unit will be explained and justified in Section 3.

References

  • AEMET (2011) Información metereologica de España. Agencia Española de Metereología. Madrid (Spain).

  • Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., Florax, R. J. G. M., & Rey, S. J. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in spatial econometrics: Methodology, tools and Applications. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. Boston: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, G. (1962). Il sistema marshaliano. In G. Becattini (Ed.), Il concetto di industria e la teoria del valore (pp. 88–125). Torino: Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, G. (1975). Introduzione. Invito a una rilettura di Marshall. In A. Marshall & P. Marshall (Eds.), Economia della produziones, a cura di G. Becattini (pp. 9–114). Milano: ISEDI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckstead, D., & Brown, W.M. (2003). From Labrador City to Toronto: The industrial Diversity of Canadian Cities, 1992 to 2002. In: Statistics Canada (Ed) Insights on the Canadian Economy 3, Ontario.

  • Blien, U., Suedekum, J., & Wolf, K. (2006). Local employment growth in West Germany: A dynamic panel approach. Labour Economics, 13(4), 445–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix, R., & Galletto, V. (2006). Sistemas Locales de Trabajo y Distritos Industriales Marshallianos en España. Econ Indust, 359, pp. 165–184.

  • Christaller, W. (1935). Die Zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, A. D., & Ord, J. K. (1981). Spatial processes: Models and Applications. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, W. J., & Polèse, M. (1988). Locational shifts in Canadian employment, 1971-1981: Decentralization vs. Decongestion. The Canadian Geographer, 32(3), 248–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, W. J., & Shearmur, R. (1996). Employment growth and change in the Canadian urban system. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., Heindenreich, M., & Braczyk, H. J. (2004). Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized word. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. R., & Weinstein, D.E. (2002). Technological superiority and the losses from migration. National Bureau of economic research working paper series no. 8971. http://www.nber.org/papers/w8971. Accessed 3 Jan 2012.

  • Doloreux, D., Shearmur, R., & Filion, P. (2001). Learning and innovation: Implications for regional policy. An Introduction. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 24(1), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisinger, P. K. (1988). The rise of the entrepreneurial State: State and local economic development policy in the United States. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, K. A., & Kumar, T. K. (1965). The functional economic area: Delineation and implications for economic analysis and policy. Papers and proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 15, 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. G. (2001). Sources of fluctuation in regional growth. The Annals of Regional Science, 35(2), 294–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaway, B., & Hudson, J. (Eds.). (1994). Community economic development: Perspectives on research and policy. New York: Thompson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. A. (1988). Advanced spatial Statistics: Special topics in the exploration of quantitative spatial series. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. A. (2003). Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering: Gaining understanding through theory and scientific visualization. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gunton, T. (2003). Natural resources and regional development: An assessment of dependency and comparative advantage paradigms. Economic Geography, 79, 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haining, R. (1990). The use of added variable plots in regression modelling with spatial data. The Professional Geographer, 42, 336–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, V. (2003). Marshall’s scale economies. Journal of Urban Economics, 53, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, D. (1999). Have international transportation cost declined? Mimeo: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • IGN (2001) Información cartográfica de España. Instituto Geografico Nacional. Madrid (Spain).

  • INE (1992) Censo de Población y Vivienda, 1991. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Madrid (Spain).

  • INE. (2007). Censo de Población, 2001. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=%2Ft20%2Fe243&file=inebase&L=0. Accessed 26 Nov 2011.

  • INE (2012) Censo de Población y Vivienda, 2011. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Madrid (Spain).

  • Jacobs, J. (1984). Cities and the wealth of nations. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (1993). The politics of Modern Europe: The State and political Authority in the Major Democracies. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R. (1995). Development, geography, and economic theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeSage, J. P., & Fischer, M. M. (2008). Spatial growth regressions: Model specification, estimation and interpretation. Spatial Economic Analysis, 3(3), 275–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage, J. P., & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. Florida: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lösch, A. (1938). The nature of economic regions. Southern Economic Journal, 5(1), 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, R. R. (2003). Twenty-five years of regional development. Regional Studies, 37(3), 303–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, E., & Oinas, P. (1999). Making connections. Technological Learning and regional economic change. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography, 72(3), 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (1999). Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies, 33(9), 869–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (1998). Slow convergence? The new endogenous growth theory and regional development. Economic Geography, 74, 201–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. B. (1995). Spatial divisions of labor: Social structures and the geography of production. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, P., & Ortega, R. (2013). Transforming European regional policy: A results-driven agenda and smart specialization. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 29(2), 405–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, P., & Ortega, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and Applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49, 1291–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J. (2001). Regional economic planning: Learning from past experience. In D. Felsenstein, R. McQuaid, P. McCann, & D. Shefer (Eds.), Public investment and regional economic development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J. (2002). Agglomeration economies: Ambiguities and confusions. Environment & Planning A, 34, 717–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J. (2008). Cities and regions: Problems and potentials. Environment & Planning A, 40, 3009–3026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge MD, Rickman DS (2006) The geography of American poverty: Is there a role for place based policy? W.E. Upjohn Employment Institute.

  • Partridge, M. D., Rickman, D. S., Ali, K., & Olfert, M. R. (2008). Lost in space: Population growth in the American hinterlands and small cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 727–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, M. D., Rickman, D. S., Ali, K., & Olfert, M. R. (2009). Agglomeration spillovers and wage and housing cost gradients across the urban hierarchy. Journal of International Economics, 78, 126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philo, C., Mitchell, R., & More, A. (1998). Reconsidering quantitative geography: The things that count. Environment & Planning A, 30(2), 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polèse, M. (2009). The wealth and the poverty of regions: Why cities matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polèse, M., & Shearmur, R. (2004). Is distance really dead? Comparing the industrial location patterns over time in Canada. International Regional Science Review, 27(4), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polèse, M., Shearmur, R., & Rubiera, F. (2006). Observing regularities in location patterns. An analysis of the spatial distribution of economic activity in Spain. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(2), 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1996). Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies, and regional policy. International Regional Science Review, 19(1–2), 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1998). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, J. M. (1998). Urban diversity and economic growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J., & Sachs, J. D. (2003). The United States as a coastal nation. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 5–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1990). Human capital and growth: Theory and evidence. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 32(1), 251–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubiera, F., & Viñuela, A. (2012). From local units to economic regions in Spain. Where the agglomeration economies make sense. In E. Fernández & F. Rubiera (Eds.), Defining the spatial scale in Modern regional analysis: New Challenges from data at local level. Advances in Spatial Science. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sforzi, F. (2012). From administrative spatial units to local Labour market areas. Some remarks on the unit of investigation of regional economics with particular reference to the applied research in Italy. In E. Fernández & F. Rubiera (Eds.), Defining the spatial scale in Modern regional analysis: New Challenges from data at local level. Advances in Spatial Science. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sforzi, F., Openshaw, S., & Wymer, C. (1997). Le Procedura di Identificazione dei Sistemi Locali del Lavoro. In F. Sforzi (Ed.), I Sistemi Locali del Lavoro (pp. 235–242). Rome: ISTAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearmur, R., & Polèse, M. (2005). Diversity and employment growth in Canada, 1971-2001: Can diversification policies succeed? The Canadian Geographer, 49(3), 272–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearmur, R., & Polèse, M. (2007). Do local factors explain local employment growth?: Evidence from Canada, 1971-2001. Regional Studies, 41(4), 453–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, M. W. (1974). Labour market areas: Uses and definition. In D. R. Diamond & J. B. McLoughlin (Eds.), Progress in planning (Vol. 2, pp. 239–353). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strambach, S. (2001). Innovation processes and the role of knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS). In K. Koschatzky, M. Kulicke, & A. Zenker (Eds.), Innovation networks – Concepts and Challenges in the European perspective (pp. 53–68). Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thissen, M., van Oort, F., Diodato, D., & Ruijs, A. (2013). Regional competivitiness and smart specialization in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Thünen, J. H. (1826). Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtchaft und Nationalökonomie. Hamburg: Perthes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. (1929). Theory of the location of industries. [Translated by Friedrich, C.J. from Weber's 1909 book]. The University of Chicago Press.

  • Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behaviour and the principle of least effort: An Introduction to human ecology. Cambridge: Adison Wesley Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Rubiera Morollón.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 OLS estimation results

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gutiérrez Posada, D., Rubiera Morollón, F. & Viñuela, A. The Determinants of Local Employment Growth in Spain. Appl. Spatial Analysis 11, 511–533 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-017-9226-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-017-9226-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation