Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chest wall reconstruction: success of a team approach—a 12-year experience from a tertiary care institution

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The thoracic cavity was considered as a forbidden area in the past and anyone attempting to meddle with it was expected to be doomed. But the past several decades have seen a marked improvement in the management and reconstruction of complex chest wall defects. This study was undertaken to review our experience in chest wall reconstruction during the past 12 years and to stress upon the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach to this complex problem.

Methods

After obtaining the necessary clearance from institutional ethics committee, we did a retrospective review of all case records of chest wall reconstructions (CWR) performed in our institution during a 12-year period from May 2005 to September 2016. Patient characteristics, co-morbidities, operative data and post-operative complications and outcomes were reviewed.

Results

During the study period, a total of 32 patients underwent CWR. All patients were assessed, planned, operated and managed by a team consisting of thoracic surgeons, plastic surgeons, intensivists and pulmonologists. Patients were in the age group of 14–72 with a male:female ratio of 15:17. Indications for CWR were neoplasms (n = 13–40.62%), post-sternotomy wound dehiscence (n = 12–37.5%), osteoradionecrosis (n = 4–12.5%), tuberculosis (n = 2–6.25%) and osteomyelitis rib (1/32–3.125%). Inflammatory defects were mostly closed with soft tissue alone whereas skeletal stabilisation with soft tissue cover was required in tumour resections. All were pedicled flaps, the most common being pectoralis major (PM) muscle flap (n = 12). Others include latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle (n = 9); rectus abdominis (RA) muscle (n = 2); transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (TRAM) (n = 2), deltopectoral (DP) (n = 1), omentum (n = 3) and breast flap (n = 3). Post-operative complications include wound dehiscence (12%), wound infection (21%) and recurrent sinus formation (7%). One partial flap failure was recorded. Post-operative mortality was 3%.

Conclusion

Chest wall reconstruction is a complex procedure and each defect needs an individualised approach for optimum outcome. Extensive chest wall resections can be safely undertaken with the support of the reconstructive surgeon and with good critical care back up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clemens MW, Evans KK, Mardini S, Arnold PG. Introduction to chest wall reconstruction: anatomy and physiology of the chest and indications for chest wall reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2011;25:5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stenton C. The MRC breathlessness scale. Occup Med. 2008;58:226–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanna S, Brandolini J, Pardolesi A, et al. Materials and techniques in chest wall reconstruction: a review. J Vis Surg. 2017;3:95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Puvvala S, Subramanyam GM, Suraparaju SS. Primary chest wall neoplasms—resection and reconstruction. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;32:184–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McKenna RJ Jr, Mountain CF, McMurtrey MJ, Larson D, Stiles QR. Current techniques for chest wall reconstruction: expanded possibilities for treatment. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;46:508–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Izaddoost S, Withers EH. Sternal reconstruction with omental and pectoralis flaps: a review of 415 consecutive cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69:296–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. van Wingerden JJ , Lapid O, Boonstra PW, de Mol BA. Muscle flaps or omental flap in the management of deep sternal wound infection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;13:179–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tukiainen E. Chest wall reconstruction after oncological resections. Scand J Surg. 2013;102:9–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Raz DJ, Clancy SL, Erhunmwunsee LJ. Surgical management of the radiated chest wall and its complications. Thorac Surg Clin. 2017;27:171–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matros E, Disa JJ. Uncommon flaps for chest wall reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2011;25:55–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayer HF, De Belaustegui EA, Loustau HD. The contralateral breast flap in autologous breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:876–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gingrass RP. Breast flaps, Ch. 404. In: Lee BT, Strauch B,Vasconez LOH,KC, editors. Grabb’s encyclopedia of flaps volume 2. 4th ed: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (LWW); 2015.

  13. Netscher DT, Izaddoost S, Sandvall B. Complications, pitfalls, and outcomes after chest wall reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2011;25:86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Nil

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lekshmi Malathi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical standards

This retrospective review was in concordance to the guidelines of Institutional Review Board of our institution.

Informed consent

Informed consent in mother tongue was obtained in all cases.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malathi, L., Das, S., Nair, J.T.K. et al. Chest wall reconstruction: success of a team approach—a 12-year experience from a tertiary care institution. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 36, 44–51 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-019-00841-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-019-00841-y

Keywords

Navigation