Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rebound effects of energy efficiency improvement based on computable general equilibrium models: a systematic review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy efficiency improvement is expected to reduce energy consumption. However, actual energy savings can be lower than anticipated, called rebound effects. This article reviews previous studies that have used computable general equilibrium (CGE) models to study the rebound effects caused by energy efficiency improvements in the recent two decades until 2021. A systematic review approach has been adopted to select the focused studies, and keywords co-occurrence analysis has been used to explore the characteristics of the selected studies. We reported our findings on specific aspects of these CGE studies, including geographic location, time scale, and methodological features; how an energy efficiency improvement is introduced; and the levels of rebound effects estimated by these studies. These findings suggest specific potential research gaps. For example, few CGE studies have focused on Russia, India, and Africa; no production functional forms other than constant elasticity of substitution (CES) have been used in these CGE studies; and little attention has been paid to negative rebound effects in the short run and the cases of joint implementation of energy efficiency improvement and other policy measures that drive energy cost higher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, G., Gilmartin, M., McGregor, P. G., Swales, J. K., & Turner, K. (2009). Modeling the economy-wide rebound effect, Energy efficiency and sustainable consumption (pp. 69–98). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, G., Hanley, N., McGregor, P., Swales, K., & Turner, K. (2007). The impact of increased efficiency in the industrial use of energy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for the United Kingdom. Energy Economics, 29, 779–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiker, M., Gurgel, A., Paltsev, S., & Reilly, J. (2009). Forward-looking versus recursive-dynamic modeling in climate policy analysis: A comparison. Economic Modelling, 26, 1341–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberán, A., Bates, S. T., Casamayor, E. O., & Fierer, N. (2012). Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities. The ISME journal, 6, 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkhordar, Z. A. (2019). Evaluating the economy-wide effects of energy efficient lighting in the household sector of Iran. Energy Policy, 127, 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bataille, C., & Melton, N. (2017). Energy efficiency and economic growth: A retrospective CGE analysis for Canada from 2002 to 2012. Energy Economics, 64, 118–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berner, A., Bruns, S., Moneta, A., & Stern, D. I. (2022). Do energy efficiency improvements reduce energy use? Empirical evidence on the economy-wide rebound effect in Europe and the United States. Energy Economics, 110, 105939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broberg, T., Berg, C., & Samakovlis, E. (2015). The economy-wide rebound effect from improved energy efficiency in Swedish industries–A general equilibrium analysis. Energy Policy, 83, 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockway, P. E., Sorrell, S., Semieniuk, G., Heun, M. K., & Court, V. (2021). Energy efficiency and economy-wide rebound effects: A review of the evidence and its implications. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 141, 110781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, L. (1990). The greenhouse effect: the fallacies in the energy efficiency solution. Energy policy, 18, 199–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J., Mengersen, K., Bennett, S., & Mazerolle, L. (2014). Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses. SpringerPlus, 3, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, R., Rebahi, S., Sánchez-Chóliz, J., & Sarasa, C. (2014). Households’ behaviour and environmental emissions in a regional economy. Economic Systems Research, 26, 410–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, R., Sánchez-Chóliz, J., & Sarasa, C. (2018). Consumer-side actions in a low-carbon economy: A dynamic CGE analysis for Spain. Energy Policy, 118, 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figus, G., Lecca, P., McGregor, P., & Turner, K. (2019). Energy efficiency as an instrument of regional development policy? The impact of regional fiscal autonomy. Regional Studies, 53, 815–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figus, G., McGregor, P. G., Swales, J. K., & Turner, K. (2020). Do sticky energy prices impact the time paths of rebound effects associated with energy efficiency actions? Energy Economics, 86, 104657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figus, G., Turner, K., McGregor, P., & Katris, A. (2017). Making the case for supporting broad energy efficiency programmes: Impacts on household incomes and other economic benefits. Energy Policy, 111, 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Font Vivanco, D., Nechifor, V., Freire-González, J., & Calzadilla, A. (2021). Economy-wide rebound makes UK's electric car subsidy fall short of expectations. Applied Energy, 297, 117138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire-González, J. (2019). Does water efficiency reduce water consumption? the economy-wide water rebound effect. Water Resources Management, 33, 2191–2202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire-González, J. (2020). Energy taxation policies can counteract the rebound effect: analysis within a general equilibrium framework. Energy Efficiency, 13, 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire-González, J., & Ho, M. S. (2021). Voluntary actions in households and climate change mitigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, 128930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, S., Wang, Y., Zuo, J., Zhou, Z., Du, H., & Mao, G. (2017). Building life cycle assessment research: A review by bibliometric analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 176–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, K., Rapson, D., & Wagner, G. (2016). The rebound effect and energy efficiency policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10, 68–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glomsrød, S., & Taoyuan, W. (2005). Coal cleaning: A viable strategy for reduced carbon emissions and improved environment in China? Energy Policy, 33, 525–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grepperud, S., & Rasmussen, I. (2004). A general equilibrium assessment of rebound effects. Energy economics, 26(2), 261–282.

  • Guerra, A.-I., & Sancho, F. (2010). Rethinking economy-wide rebound measures: An unbiased proposal. Energy Policy, 38, 6684–6694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, N., McGregor, P. G., Swales, J. K., & Turner, K. (2009). Do increases in energy efficiency improve environmental quality and sustainability? Ecological Economics, 68, 692–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmøy, E. (2016). The development and use of CGE models in Norway. Journal of Policy Modeling, 38(3), 448–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2007). In C. W. Team, R. K. Pachauri, & A. Reisinger (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 104). IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, W.S., 1866. The coal question; an inquiry concerning the progress of the nation and the probable exhaustion of our coal-mines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khazzoom, J. D. (1980). Economic implications of mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances. The energy journal, 1(4).

  • Khoshkalam Khosroshahi, M., & Sayadi, M. (2020). Tracking the sources of rebound effect resulting from the efficiency improvement in petrol, diesel, natural gas and electricity consumption: A CGE analysis for Iran. Energy, 197, 117134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. I. (2019). Investigation of Japanese electricity industry using a CGE model of translog function. Journal of Economic Structures, 8(1), 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klump, R., McAdam, P., & Willman, A. (2012). The normalized CES production function: theory and empirics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26, 769–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koesler, S., Swales, K., & Turner, K. (2016). International spillover and rebound effects from increased energy efficiency in Germany. Energy Economics, 54, 444–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, A. V., Aziz, B., Shams, I., & Busse, J. W. (2009). Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. Jama, 302, 1092–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulmer, V., & Seebauer, S. (2019). How robust are estimates of the rebound effect of energy efficiency improvements? A sensitivity analysis of consumer heterogeneity and elasticities. Energy Policy, 132, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langarita, R., Cazcarro, I., Sánchez-Chóliz, J., & Sarasa, C. (2021). The role of fiscal measures in promoting renewable electricity in Spain. Energy Conversion and Management, 244, 114480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecca, P., McGregor, P. G., Swales, J. K., & Turner, K. (2014). The added value from a general equilibrium analysis of increased efficiency in household energy use. Ecological Economics, 100, 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine, D. (2020). General equilibrium rebound from energy efficiency innovation. European Economic Review, 125, 103431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Bao, Q., Ren, X., Xie, Y., Ren, J., & Yang, Y. (2017). Reducing rebound effect through fossil subsidies reform: A comprehensive evaluation in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Jiang, H.-D., Yang, B., & Liao, H. (2019). An analysis of research hotspots and modeling techniques on carbon capture and storage. Science of the total environment, 687, 687–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Q.-M., Fan, Y., & Wei, Y.-M. (2009). The effect of energy end-use efficiency improvement on China's energy use and CO2 emissions: A CGE model-based analysis. Energy Efficiency, 2, 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. X., Du, K. R., & Li, J. L. (2019a). An improved approach to estimate direct rebound effect by incorporating energy efficiency: A revisit of China’s industrial energy demand. Energy Economics, 80, 720–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Wei, T., & Park, D. (2019b). Macroeconomic impacts of energy productivity: a general equilibrium perspective. Energy Efficiency, 12, 1857–1872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., Liu, Y., & Zhou, M. (2017). Rebound effect of improved energy efficiency for different energy types: A general equilibrium analysis for China. Energy Economics, 62, 248–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, A., & Marpaung, C. O. P. (2014). Carbon pricing and energy efficiency improvement -- why to miss the interaction for developing economies? An illustrative CGE based application to the Pakistan case. Energy Policy, 67, 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the american society for information science and technology, 58, 2105–2125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulrow, C. D. (1994). Systematic reviews - Rationale for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 309, 597–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. (2019). Climate change: the ultimate challenge for economics. American Economic Review, 109, 1991–2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, V. M., Löschel, A., & Reilly, J. (2008). Directed technical change and differentiation of climate policy. Energy Economics, 30, 2855–2878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, J.-T., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., He, Y., Taketani, M., Shi, R., & Zhu, X.-D. (2019). Economic and welfare influences of an energy excise tax in Jiangsu province of China: A computable general equilibrium approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 1403–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, A. M., & Pereira, R. M. (2016). Reducing carbon emissions in Portugal: the relative roles of fossil fuel prices, energy efficiency, and carbon taxation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(10), 1825–1852.

  • Pui, K. L., & Othman, J. (2017). Economics and environmental implications of fuel efficiency improvement in Malaysia: A computable general equilibrium approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 459–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajabi, M. (2022). Dilemmas of energy efficiency: A systematic review of the rebound effect and attempts to curb energy consumption. Energy Research & Social Science, 89, 102661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, F. F. D., & Almeida, E. L. F. D. (2021). A general equilibrium model of macroeconomic rebound effect: A broader view. Energy Economics, 98, 105232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasa, C., & Turner, K. (2021). Can a combination of efficiency initiatives give us "good" rebound effects? Energy, 235, 121335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, H. D. (2000). A view from the macro side: rebound, backfire, and Khazzoom–Brookes. Energy policy, 28, 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, H. D. (2008). Fuel conserving (and using) production functions. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2184–2235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, K., & Whalley, J. (2013). Capital-labor-energy substitution in nested CES production functions for China. National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, A. C. H., Paroussos, L., & Allwood, J. M. (2020). Comparing energy and material efficiency rebound effects: an exploration of scenarios in the GEM-E3 macroeconomic model. Ecological Economics, 173, 106544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, H., Lu, S., & Solaymani, S. (2021). Impacts of oil price uncertainty on energy efficiency, economy, and environment of Malaysia: stochastic approach and CGE model. Energy Efficiency, 14, 1–17.

  • Turner, K. (2009). Negative rebound and disinvestment effects in response to an improvement in energy efficiency in the UK economy. Energy Economics, 31, 648–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, K. (2013). " Rebound" effects from increased energy efficiency: A time to pause and reflect. The Energy Journal, 34(4).

  • Turner, K., & Hanley, N. (2011). Energy efficiency, rebound effects and the environmental Kuznets Curve. Energy Economics, 33, 709–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivanco, D. F., Nechifor, V., Freire-González, J., & Calzadilla, A. (2021). Economy-wide rebound makes UK’s electric car subsidy fall short of expectations. Applied Energy, 297, 117138.

  • Wang, J., Quiggin, J., & Wittwer, G. (2019). The rebound effect of the Australian proposed light vehicle fuel efficiency standards. Economic Analysis and Policy, 61, 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N., & Wei, W. (2019). China's regional rebound effect based on modelling multi-regional CGE. Applied Economics, 51, 5712–5726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, T. (2010). A general equilibrium view of global rebound effects. Energy Economics, 32, 661–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, T., & Liu, Y. (2017). Estimation of global rebound effect caused by energy efficiency improvement. Energy Economics, 66, 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, X., Moreno-Cruz, J., & Crittenden, J. C. (2015). Regional energy rebound effect: The impact of economy-wide and sector level energy efficiency improvement in Georgia, USA. Energy Policy, 87, 250–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M., Liu, Y., Feng, S., Liu, Y., & Lu, Y. (2018). Decomposition of rebound effect: An energy-specific, general equilibrium analysis in the context of China. Applied Energy, 221, 280–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for constructive comments from three anonymous reviewers.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Research Council of Norway (grant no. 303486) and Diku–Norwegian Agency for International Cooperation and Quality Enhancement in Higher Education (Grant no. NGSC-CN-2021/0008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taoyuan Wei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, W., Miao, J. & Wei, T. Rebound effects of energy efficiency improvement based on computable general equilibrium models: a systematic review. Energy Efficiency 16, 65 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-023-10148-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-023-10148-y

Keywords

Navigation