Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cool or school?: the role of building attributes in explaining residential energy burdens in California

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper quantifies the dimensions of an important energy efficiency conversation: the energy burden of low-income households. Due to budgetary constraints, low-income households face a stark consumption trade-offs described as “cool or school”. This study is the first to apply multivariate building energy regression modeling to assess the independent effects of various building characteristics and appliances on a household’s energy burden in the USA. We find that more attic insulation and newer air conditioners significantly predict lower energy burdens. Furthermore, homeowners enjoy ~ 27% more attic insulation compared to renters. Our results offer empirical support for programs that offer deep retrofits to low-income households. We conclude by offering suggestions for leveraging weatherization funding to fund building energy retrofits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A Google News search in June of 2017 yielded the following results: “Renewable Energy” = 2,510,000 results, “Fracking” = 721,000 results. “Energy Burden” = 467 results.

  2. A complete review of the factors predicting building climate control behavior, and related window opening behavior, is beyond the scope of this paper. Interested readers are referred to Fabi et al. (2012).

  3. Variables converted from categorical include income, home age and square-footage, attic insulation, age of heating and cooling systems, refrigerator age, and thermostat settings.

  4. More TV’s likely correlates with both higher income and thereby higher energy expenditures, and so is related to energy burden by both the numerator and the denominator. However, since energy expenditures are more precisely measured due to categorical recording of income, it is sensible that more TV’s would be correlated with a higher energy burden in our data.

Abbreviations

ARRA:

American Reinvestment and Recovery Act

DSM:

Demand side management

HERO:

Home energy renovation Opportunity

IOU:

Investor-owned-utility

LIHEAP:

Low-income Home Energy Assistance Program

PACE:

Property assessed clean energy

RASS:

Residential Appliance Saturation Survey

SFR:

Single family residence

WAP:

Weatherization Assistance Program

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the participants in the 2014 Western Political Science Association annual meeting for their comments on an earlier version of this paper. This research was partially funded under California Energy Commission Public Interest Energy Research grant # 57356A/11-1. The sponsors played no part in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the article; or the decision to submit for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hal T. Nelson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nelson, H.T., Gebbia, N. Cool or school?: the role of building attributes in explaining residential energy burdens in California. Energy Efficiency 11, 2017–2032 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9681-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9681-1

Keywords

Navigation