Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Policy strategies for achieving large long-term savings from retrofitting existing buildings

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to achieve long-term targets for energy savings and emission reductions, substantial savings will be needed from existing buildings. For example, a recent analysis for the USA examines aggressive strategies to cut carbon emissions in half by 2040 and finds that in order to achieve this emission reduction target, more than half of existing buildings will need comprehensive energy efficiency retrofits. Germany is targeting an overall primary energy consumption reduction of 50% in 2050 including increasing building renovation rate to 2% per year. In France, ambitious targets have also been set for existing buildings: 50% reduction of primary energy consumption in 2050 compared to the 2012 level. Multiple countries have realized the importance of comprehensive building retrofits and have begun to adopt policies to spur these improvements. For example, Germany is emphasizing grants and loans through the KfW Development Bank, complemented with building and heating system labels, a new “heating check” programme, and possible technical renovation requirements. France has established a goal of bringing all buildings up to “A” performance level (on their A–G scale) by 2050 in order for them to be sold or leased, with lower performance levels required as soon as 2020. In the USA, the focus has been on a combination of rating and disclosure of energy use, financing, and technical assistance. Focused community approaches show promise. This paper summarizes the efforts, successes and challenges, future directions, and savings of building retrofit policies in the three countries. We conclude by contrasting the three countries and discussing areas of opportunity for these and other countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In France, energy saving obligation targets are specified in terms of kilowatt hour cumac of final energy, “cumac” meaning “cumulative and discounted” a specific measurement unit corresponds to the energy savings accumulated over the life-time of the implemented operation and actualized (discounted) at a rate of 4% per year. Saved energy is calculated with reference to average existing devices—additionality principle, for instance: a 18-W LCB save 49 kWh/year–880 h/year; 70% of sold LCB replace incandescent bulbs; time for life is 7.5 years with a discount factor of 0.88; energy saving is 49*0.7*7.5*0.88 = 230 cumac-kWh.

  2. Participation information through Dec. 31, 2017, from Abigail Corso, Elevate Energy, email to S. Nadel dates Jan. 26, 2018.

  3. See https://www.nrdc.org/experts/merrian-borgeson/can-paying-performance-increase-energy-savings .

  4. See https://www1.eere.energy.gov/analysis/pdfs/bbnp_volume_1_final_evaluation_072215.pdf .

  5. http://www.naseo.org/state-energy-financing-programs .

  6. http://pacenation.us/pace-market-data/ (visited Jan. 21, 2018).

  7. See http://www.imt.org/resources/detail/map-u.s.-building-benchmarking-policies (visited Sept. 27, 2017).

  8. https://www.cityofberkeley.info/BESO/ and https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/71421.

  9. Also see https://bouldercolorado.gov/plan-develop/smartregs.

  10. See http://www1.nyc.gov/assets/buildings/local_laws/ll88of2009.pdf .

  11. See https://www.ladbs.org/docs/default-source/publications/ordinances/ord_184674_12-15-16.pdf?sfvrsn=4 .

  12. Somewhat similar results were achieved in 1990 in the Town of Espanola in Ontario, Canada (Results Center 1992b).

  13. Author’s calculation based on 450,000 participants and 78.5 million attached and detached single-family homes in the USA in 2009 (from https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2009/#structural).

  14. For example, the state of Vermont uses a portion of revenue from sales of allowances in a regional greenhouse gas cap and trade programme to fund retrofits to these homes.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carine Sebi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sebi, C., Nadel, S., Schlomann, B. et al. Policy strategies for achieving large long-term savings from retrofitting existing buildings. Energy Efficiency 12, 89–105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9661-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9661-5

Keywords

Navigation