Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable base isolation: a review of techniques, implementation, and extreme events

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Growing concerns about seismic events enforced structural engineers and architects to embrace the hazardous effect of ground motion in design. To address this, researchers have developed various base isolation (BI) techniques. This study comprehensively reviews BI system types, techniques, and implementation. Exploring the dynamic response of three-dimensional BI devices and the mutual effects of isolation devices and soil-structure interaction during strong ground motion, the paper covers topics such as seismic isolation of nuclear power plants, cost analysis, and various optimization techniques. Furthermore, the paper investigates the behavior of isolation devices in beyond-design events, including blast and aircraft impact loading. In general, the seismic isolation and control device response is demonstrated through shaking table tests and computational analysis. The study sheds light on the functions of seismic isolation system by comparing them with fixed base structures. Additionally, the paper presents codal recommendations, recent advancements, and current practices, aligning them with historical developments and past reviews of different BI techniques, along with their advantages and disadvantages. In conclusion, the closing remarks emphasize the future research prospects in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\({D}_{D}\) :

Design Displacement

\({Q}_{ISO}\) :

Shear force

\({{\text{Q}}}_{{\text{S}}}\) :

Shear force at the base of the superstructure

\(\beta \left(\xi ,{T}_{e}\right)\) :

Response reduction factor

\({S}_{a}({T}_{e},{\xi }_{e})\) :

Spectral acceleration

\({K}_{e}\) :

Effective stiffness

References

  1. Spencer B F and Nagarajaiah S 2003 State of the Art of Structural Control. J. Struct. Eng. 129: 845–856. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2003)129:7(845)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clemente P and Martelli A 2019 Seismically isolated buildings in Italy: State-of-the-art review and applications. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 119: 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. De Luca A and Guidi L G 2019 State of art in the worldwide evolution of base isolation design. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 125: 105722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Calvi P M and Calvi G M 2018 Historical development of friction-based seismic isolation systems. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 106: 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chopra A 2007 Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson Prentice Hall

  6. Standards ASCE/SEI 7-16 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures

  7. Constantinou M C, Whittaker A S and Kalpakidis Y 2007 Performance of Seismic Isolation Hardware under Service and Seismic Loading - Technical Report MCEER-07-0012. MCEER. 471

  8. Zhang C and Ali A 2021 The advancement of seismic isolation and energy dissipation mechanisms based on friction. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 146: 106746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheikh H, Van Engelen N C and Ruparathna R 2022 A review of base isolation systems with adaptive characteristics. Structures. 38: 1542–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Makris N 2018 Seismic isolation: Early history. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3124

  11. Whittaker A S, Sollogoub P and Kim M K 2018 Seismic isolation of nuclear power plants: Past, present and future. Nucl. Eng. Des. 338: 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.07.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Touaillon J 1870 Improvement in buildings. US Pat No 99,973

  13. Nakamura Y and Okada K 2019 Review on seismic isolation and response control methods of buildings in Japan. Geoenvironmental Disasters. 6: 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-019-0123-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Avinash A R, Krishnamoorthy A, Kamath Kiran and Chaithra M 2022 Sliding Isolation Systems: Historical Review, Modeling Techniques, and the Contemporary Trends. Buildings. 12: 1997. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harvey P S and Kelly K C 2016 A review of rolling-type seismic isolation: Historical development and future directions. Eng. Struct. 125: 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Robinson W H 1982 Lead-rubber hysteretic bearings suitable for protecting structures during earthquakes. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 10: 593–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maureira-Carsalade N, Pardo E, Oyarzo-Vera C and Roco A 2020 A roller type base isolation device with tensile strength. Eng. Struct. 221: 111003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Braga F and Laterza M 2004 Field testing of low-rise base isolated building. Eng. Struct. 26: 1599–1610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khan B L, Azeem M and Usman M 2019 Effect of near and far field earthquakes on performance of various base isolation systems. Procedia Struct. Integr. 18: 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiong Wei and Li Y 2013 Seismic isolation using granulated tire–soil mixtures for less-developed regions: experimental validation. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42: 2187–2193. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Madhekar S N and Vairagade H 2020 Innovative Base Isolators From Scrap Tyre Rubber Pads

  22. Banović I, Radnić J, Grgić N and Matešan D 2018 The Use of Limestone Sand for the Seismic Base Isolation of Structures. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2018: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9734283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Losanno D, Calabrese A and Madera-Sierra I E 2020 Recycled versus Natural-Rubber Fiber-Reinforced Bearings for Base Isolation: Review of the Experimental Findings. J. Earthq. Eng. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1748764

  24. Casablanca O, Ventura G and Garesc F 2018 Seismic isolation of buildings using composite foundations based on metamaterials. 123: 174903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5018005

  25. Warn G P and Ryan K L 2012 A review of seismic isolation for buildings: Historical development and research needs. Buildings. 2: 300–325. https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS2030300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Naeim F K 1999 Design of Seismic Isolated Structures: From Theory to Practice

  27. Su L, Ahmadi G and TadjbakhshIradj G 1992 Comparative Study of Base Isolation Systems. J. Eng. Mech. 115: 1976–1992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mokha A S, Constantinou M C and Reinhorn A M 1990 Experimental study and analytical prediction of earthquake response of a sliding isolation system with a spherical system. Tech Rep NCEER-90-O020 State Univ New York, Buffalo, NY

  29. Clarke C S J, Buchanan R and Oil A 2005 Structural Platform Solution for Seismic Arctic Environments – Sakhalin II Offshore Facilities. In: Offshore Technology Conference

  30. Castaldo P, Palazzo B, Ferrentino T and Petrone G 2017 Influence of the strength reduction factor on the seismic reliability of structures with FPS considering intermediate PGA/PGV ratios. Compos. Part B Eng. 115: 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Almazan J L, La De and Llera J C 2002 Analytical model of structures with frictional pendulum isolators. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31: 305–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsai C S, Lin Y C and Su H C 2010 Characterization and modeling of multiple friction pendulum isolation system with numerous sliding interfaces. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 39: 1463–1491. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fenz D M and Constantinou M C 2006 Behaviour of the double concave Friction Pendulum bearing. Earthq Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35: 1403–1424. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Castaldo P and Alfano G 2020 Seismic reliability-based design of hardening and softening structures isolated by double concave sliding devices. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 129: 105930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ponzo F C, Cesare A Di, Leccese G and Nigro D 2017 Shake table testing on restoring capability of double concave friction pendulum seismic isolation systems. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2907

  36. Katsaras C P, Panagiotakos T B and Kolias B 2008 Restoring capability of bilinear hysteretic seismic isolation systems. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37: 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tsopelas P, Okamoto S, Constantinou M C and Ozaki D F S 1994 NCEER - Taisei Corporation Research Program on Sliding Seismic Isolation Systems for Bridges: Experimental and analytical study of a system consisting of sliding bearings and fluid restoring force/damping devices

  38. Kim Y S and Yun C B 2007 Seismic response characteristics of bridges using double concave friction pendulum bearings with tri-linear behavior. Eng. Struct. 29: 3082–3093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ozbulut O E and Hurlebaus S 2011 Optimal design of superelastic-friction base isolators for seismic protection of highway bridges against near-field earthquakes. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40: 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fenz D M and Constantinou M C 2008 Spherical sliding isolation bearings with adaptive behavior: Theory. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.751

  41. Fenz D M and Constantinou M C 2008 Modeling triple friction pendulum bearings for response-history analysis. Earthq. Spectra. 24: 1011–1028. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2982531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Becker T C and Mahin S A 2012 Experimental and analytical study of the bi-directional behavior of the triple friction pendulum isolator. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41: 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee D and Constantinou M C 2016 Quintuple Friction Pendulum Isolator-Behavior, Modeling and Validation. Earthq. Spectra. 32: 1607–1626. https://doi.org/10.1193/040615EQS053M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Calvi M, Moratti M and Calvi G M 2016 Seismic isolation devices based on sliding between surfaces with variable friction coefficient. Earthq. Spectra. 32: 2291–2315. https://doi.org/10.1193/091515EQS139M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shang J, Tan P, Zhang Y, Han J and Mi P 2021 Seismic isolation design of structure using variable friction pendulum bearings. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 148: 106855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang C, Ali A and Sun L 2021 Investigation on low-cost friction-based isolation systems for masonry building structures: Experimental and numerical studies. Eng. Struct. 243: 112645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ali A, Zhang C, Bibi T, Zhu L, Cao L, Li C and Hsiao P C 2022 Investigation of five different low-cost locally available isolation layer materials used in sliding base isolation systems. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 154: 107127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bibi T, Ali A, Naeem A, Zhang C and Ahmad N 2023 To Investigate Different Parameters of Economic Sliding Based Seismic Isolation System. J. Earthq. Eng. 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2023.2217935

  49. Jangid R S and Datta K 1995 Seismic behaviour of base-isolated buildings:a state-of-the-art review. Proc. Instn. Ciu. Engrs. Structs. Bldgs. 110: 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1680/istbu.1995.27599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gueruad, 1985 Seismic isolation using sliding elastomer bearing pads. J Nucl engg Des. 84: 363–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Fan F, Ahmadi G and Mostaghei N 1991 Performance analysis of aseismic base isolation systems for a multi-story building. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 10: 152–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Mostaghel N and Khodaverdian M 1987 Dynamics of resilient-friction base isolator (R-FBI). Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 15: 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290150307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Su L, Ahmadi G and Tadjbakhsh I G 2007 Performance of sliding resilient-friction base-isolation system. J. Struct. Eng. 117: 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1991)117:1(165)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Peng Y, Huang T, Chen J and Bearings I 2020 Experimental Study of Seismic Isolated Structures with Sliding Implant-Magnetic Bearings. J. Earthq. Eng. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1767230

  55. Weisman J and Warn G P 2012 Stability of Elastomeric and Lead-Rubber Seismic Isolation Bearings. J. Struct. Eng. 138: 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kelly J M and Marsico M R 2013 Tension buckling in rubber bearings affected by cavitation. Eng. Struct. 56: 656–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ounis H M and Ounis A 2013 Parameters Influencing the Response of a Base-Isolated. Slovak J Civ Eng. 21: 31–42. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjce-2013-0014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kalpakidis I V and Constantinou M C 2010 Principles of scaling and similarity for testing of lead–rubber bearings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 139: 551–1568. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ahmadipour M and Alam M S 2017 Sensitivity analysis on mechanical characteristics of lead-core steel-reinforced elastomeric bearings under cyclic loading. Eng. Struct. 140: 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Yang W, Sun X, Wang M and Liu P 2017 Vertical stiffness degradation of laminated rubber bearings under lateral deformation. Constr. Build. Mater. 152: 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Salic R B, Garevski M A and Milutinovic Z V 2008 Response of Lead-Rubber Bearing Isolated Structure. 14 World Conf Earthq Eng

  62. Lee H P, Cho M S and Park J Y 2011 Developing Lead Rubber Bearing for Seismic Isolation of Nuclear Power Plants. In: 15 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering

  63. Arguc S, Avsar O and Ozdemir G 2017 Effects of lead core heating on the superstructure response of isolated buildings. J Struct Eng. 143: 04017145. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Kanbir Z, Özdemir G and Alhan C 2018 Modeling of Lead Rubber Bearings via 3D-BASIS, SAP2000, and OpenSees Considering Lead Core Heating Modeling Capabilities. Int. J. Struct. Civ. Eng. Res. 7: 294–301. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijscer.7.4.294-301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Lu X, Zhou Y and Lu W 2007 Shaking table model test and numerical analysis of a complex high-rise building. Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 16: 131–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Fu W, Zhang C and Sun L 2017 Experimental investigation of a base isolation system incorporating MR dampers with the high-order single step control algorithm. Appl. Sci. 7: 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7040344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Suhara J, Tamura T, Okada Y and Umeki K 2002 Development of Three Dimensional Seismic Isolation Device with Laminated Rubber Bearing and Rolling Seal Type Air Spring. Proc PVP2002 2002 ASME Press Vessel Pip Conf August 5-9, 2002, Vancouver, BC, Canada

  68. Saiful Islam A B M, Jameel M, Rahman M A and Jumaat M Z 2011 Earthquake time history for Dhaka, Bangladesh as competent seismic record. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 6: 3921–3926. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS11.702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Doudoumis I N and Gravalas F 2005 Analytical Modeling of Elastomeric Lead-Rubber Bearings with the use of Finite Element Micromodels. In: 5th GRACM International Congress on Computational Mechanics

  70. Neethu B and Das D 2019 Effect of dynamic soil–structure interaction on the seismic response of bridges with elastomeric bearings. Asian J. Civ. Eng. 20: 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0098-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Iizuka M 2000 a Macroscopic mechanical model for simulating large-deformation behaviors of laminated rubber bearings. J. Eng. Struct. 22: 323–334. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.68.83_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Saedniya M and Behzad S 2019 Numerical modeling of elastomeric seismic isolators for determining force–displacement curve from cyclic loading. Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng. 11: 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-019-00238-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Karimi B M R and Khordachi A M 2020 Assessing the three-dimensional seismic behavior of the multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) structure with LCRB and LRB control systems. Asian J. Civ. Eng. 21: 871–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00246-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Maureira N, de la Llera J, Oyarzo C and Miranda S 2017 A nonlinear model for multilayered rubber isolators based on a co-rotational formulation. Eng. Struct. 131: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Kumar M, Whittaker A S and Constantinou M C 2013 Mechanical Properties of Elastomeric Seismic Isolation Bearings for Analysis Under Extreme. 22nd Conf Struct Mech React Technol

  76. Crandall S H, Lee S S and Williams J H 1974 Accumulated Slip of a Friction-Controlled Mass Excited by Earthquake Motions. ASME. 41(4): 1094–1098

    Google Scholar 

  77. Calvi P M and Ruggiero D M 2016 Numerical modelling of variable friction sliding base isolators. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 14: 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9834-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Sachdeva G, Chakraborty S and Ray-Chaudhuri S 2018 Seismic response control of a structure isolated by flat sliding bearing and nonlinear restoring spring: Experimental study for performance evaluation. Eng. Struct. 159: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Kumar M, Whittaker A S and Constantinou M C 2015 Characterizing friction in sliding isolation bearings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44: 1409–1425. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Quaglini V, Bocciarelli M, Gandelli E and Dubini P 2014 Numerical assessment of frictional heating in sliding bearings for seismic isolation. J. Earthq. Eng. 18: 1198–1216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2014.924890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Tsopelas P, Constantinou M C, Kim Y S and Okamoto S 1996 Experimental study of FPS system in bridge seismic. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 25: 65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Cardone D, Narjabadifam P and Nigro D 2011 Shaking table tests of the smart restorable sliding base isolation system (SRSBIS). J. Earthq. Eng. 15: 1157–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.555057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Falborski T and Jankowski R 2012 Shaking table experimental study on the base isolation system made of polymer bearings. 15 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, LISBOA

  84. Das A, Dutta A and Deb S K 2015 Performance of fiber-reinforced elastomeric base isolators under cyclic excitation. Struct. Control Heal Monit. 22: 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Madden G J, Symans M D and Wongprasert N 2002 Experimental verification of seismic response of building frame with adaptive sliding base-isolation system. J Struct Eng. 128: 1037–1045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2002)128:8(1037)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Kelly J M 1986 Aseismic base isolation: review and bibliography. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 5: 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-7261(86)90006-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Hwang J-S and Hsu T-Y 2000 Experimental study of isolated building under triaxial ground excitations. J. Struct. Eng. 126: 879–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Sato N, Kato A and Fukushima Y 2002 Shaking table tests on failure characteristics of base isolation system for a DFBR plant. Nucl. Eng. Des. 212: 293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Kalpakidis I V Constantinou M C 2008 Effects of heating and load history on the behavior of lead–rubber bearings. Tech. Rep. MCEER-08-0027, Multidiscip. Cent. Earthq. Eng. Res. Univ. Buffalo, State Univ. New York,Buffalo, NY

  90. Kalpakidis I V and Constantinou M C 2009 Effects of heating on the behavior of lead-rubber bearings. I: theory. J. Struct. Eng. 135: 1440–1449. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Kalpakidis I V and Constantinou M C 2009 Effects of heating on the behavior of lead-rubber bearings. II: Verification of theory. J. Struct. Eng. 135: 1450–1461. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Ozdemir G, Avsar O and Bayhan B 2011 Change in response of bridges isolated with LRBs due to lead core heating. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 31: 921–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Tsai C S, Chiang T C and Chen B J 2003 Shaking table tests of a full scale steel structure isolated with MFPS. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Press Vessel Pip Div PVP. 466: 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2003-2100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Chalhoub M S and Kelly J M 1990 Comparison of SEAONC base isolation tentative code to shake table tests. J. Struct. Eng. 116: 925–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Astroza R, Conte J P, Restrepo J I, Hamed E and Tara H 2013 Shake table testing of a full-scale five-story building: system identification of the five-story test structure. Struct. Congr. 1472–1484

  96. Paulson T J, Abrams D P and Mayes R L 1991 Shaking-table study of base isolation for masonry buildings. J. Struct. Eng. 117: 3315–3336. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1991)117:11(3315)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Wu Y M and Samali B 2002 Shake table testing of a base isolated model. Eng. Struct. 24: 1203–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00054-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Brewick P T, Johnson E A, Sato E and Sasaki T 2021 Modeling the dynamic behavior of isolation devices in a hybrid base-isolation layer of a full-scale building. J. Eng. Mech. 146: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Ji X, Fenves G L, Kajiwara K and Nakashima M 2011 Seismic damage detection of a full-scale shaking table test structure. J. Struct. Eng. 137: 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Tagliafierro B, Montuori R and Castellano M G 2021 Shake table testing and numerical modelling of a steel pallet racking structure with a seismic isolation system. Thin-Walled Struct. 164: 107924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Dao N D, Okazaki T, Mahin S A, Zahgu A E, Kajiwara K and Matsumori T 2011 Experimental Evaluation of an Innovative Isolation System for a Lightweight Steel Moment Frame Building at E-Defense. 41171: 2951–2962. https://doi.org/10.1061/41171(401)256

  102. Peng Y, Ding L, Chen J, Liu J T and Villaverde R 2020 Shaking table test of seismic isolated structures with sliding hydromagnetic bearings. J. Struct. Eng. 146: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Barbat A H, Rodellar J, Ryan E P and Molinares N 2002 Active control of nonlinear base-isolated buildings. J. Eng. Mech. 121: 676–684. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1995)121:6(676)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Ferraioli M and Mandara A 2016 Base isolation for seismic retrofitting of a multiple building structure: evaluation of equivalent linearization method. Math. Probl. Eng. 2016: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8934196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Vamvatsikos D and Cornell C A 2002 Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31: 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Ryan K L, Button M R and Mayes R L 2018 ASCE 7–16 lateral force distribution equations for static design of seismically isolated buildings. J. Struct. Eng. 145: 04018258. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Kulkarni J A and Jangid R S 2002 Rigid body response of base-isolated structures. J. Struct. Control. 9: 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Shaaban M and Ahmed S 2012 Building with base isolation techniques. J. of Al-Azhar University Eng. Sector. 7(1): 147–159

    Google Scholar 

  109. Chimamphant S and Kasai K 2015 Comparative response and performance of base-isolated and fixed-base structures. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45: 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Dao N D, Ryan K L and Nguyen-Van H 2019 Evaluating simplified models in predicting global seismic responses of a shake table–test building isolated by triple friction pendulum bearings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 48: 594–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Narasimhan S and Nagarajaiah S 2010 Key findings from the nonlinear base-isolated benchmark. Proc 19th Anal Comput Spec Conf. 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1061/41131(370)25

  112. Xiong Wei, Li-Zhong J, Zhi-Hui Z and Yao-Zhuang L 2021 Introduction of flat-spring friction system for seismic isolation. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 145: 106649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Sharath S, Lal K M, Kosbab B D, Ingersoll E D, Shirvan K and Whittaker A S 2022 Seismic isolation: A pathway to standardized advanced nuclear reactors. Nucl. Eng. Des. 387: 111445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Araki Y, Asai T and Masui T 2009 Vertical vibration isolator having piecewise-constant restoring force. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 38: 1505–1523. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Tsipianitis A and Tsompanakis Y 2021 Optimizing the seismic response of base-isolated liquid storage tanks using swarm intelligence algorithms. Comput. Struct. 243: 106407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Geem Z W 2008 Novel derivative of harmony search algorithm for discrete design variables. Appl. Math. Comput. 199: 223–230

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  117. Nigdeli S M, Bekdasß G and Alhan C 2014 Optimization of seismic isolation systems via harmony search. Eng. Optim. 46: 1553–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Chung L L, Kao PS , Yang C Y and Wu L Y 2013 Optimal frictional coefficient of structural isolation system. J. Vib. Control. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546313487938

  119. Moeindarbari H and Taghikhany T 2014 Seismic optimum design of triple friction pendulum bearing subjected to near-fault pulse-like ground motions. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 50: 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1079-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Quaranta G, Marano G C and Greco R M G 2014 Parametric identification of seismic isolators using differential evolution and particle swarm optimization. Appl. Soft Comput. 22: 458–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Charmpis D C and Komodromos P P M 2012 Optimized earthquake response of multi-storey buildings with seismic isolation at various elevations. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41: 2289–2310. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Çerçevik A E, Avşar Ö and Hasançebi O 2020 Optimum design of seismic isolation systems using metaheuristic search methods. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 131: 106012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.106012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Kandemir E C and Mortazavi A 2022 Optimization of seismic base isolation system using a fuzzy reinforced swarm intelligence. Adv. Eng. Softw. 174: 103323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Mazza F and Pucci D 2016 Static vulnerability of an existing r.c. structure and seismic retrofitting by CFRP and base-isolation: a case study. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 84: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Matsagar V A and Jangid R S 2008 Base isolation for seismic retrofitting of structures. Pract. Period Struct. Des. Constr. 13: 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0680(2008)13:4(175)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Zhang R, Wu M, Lu W, Li X and Lu X 2021 Seismic retrofitting of a historic building by using an isolation system with a weak restoring force. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 148: 106836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Mokha A S, Amin N, Constantinou M C and Zayas V 1996 Seismic isolation retrofit of large historic building. J. Structural Eng. 122: 298–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Pompeu S 2010 Guide for the Structural Rehabilitation of Heritage Buildings

  129. Housner GW 1957 Dynamic pressures on accelerated fluid containers. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 47(1): 15–35.

  130. Available online: www.earthquakeprotection.com. (Accessed April 2019); EPS. Earthquake Protection Systems. In: 2019

  131. Moslemi M, Kianoush M R and Pogorzelski W 2011 Seismic response of liquid-filled elevated tanks. Eng. Struct. 33: 2074–2084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Cho Hwan K, Kyum M, Mook Y and Yong S 2004 Seismic response of base-isolated liquid storage tanks considering fluid–structure–soil interaction in time domain. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 24: 839–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Meng X, Li X, Xu X, Zhang J, Zhou W and Zhou D 2019 Earthquake response of cylindrical storage tanks on an elastic soil. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 7: 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00141-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Jing W, Feng J, Wang S and Song S 2023 Failure probability of a liquid storage tank with three-dimensional base-isolation under earthquake action. Structures. 58: 105633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Kumar H and Saha S K 2021 Seismic performance of base-isolated elevated liquid storage tanks considering soil – structure interaction modeling of elevated liquid storage tank. Pract. Period Struc- tural Des. Constr. 26: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Farajian M, Iman K M and Kontoni N 2017 Evaluation of soil-structure interaction on the seismic response of liquid storage tanks under earthquake ground motions. Computation. 5(1): 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation5010017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Mahmoud S, Austrell P E and Jankowski R 2012 Simulation of the response of base-isolated buildings under earthquake excitations considering soil flexibility. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 11: 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-012-0127-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Bielak J 1978 Dynamic response of non-linear building-foundation systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 6: 17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Kelly J M and Eeri M 1990 Base isolation: linear theory and design. Earthq. Spect. 6(2): 223–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Luco J E 2014 Effects of soil-structure interaction on seismic base isolation. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 66: 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Jennings P C and Bielak J 1972 Dynamics of Building-Soil Interaction

  142. Veletsos A S and Tang Y 1990 Soil-structure interaction effects for laterally excited liquid storage tanks. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 19: 473–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Bolisetti C, Whittaker A S and Coleman J L 2018 Linear and nonlinear soil-structure interaction analysis of buildings and safety-related nuclear structures. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 107: 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Tubaldi E, Mitoulis S A and Ahmadi H 2018 Comparison of different models for high damping rubber bearings in seismically isolated bridges. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 104: 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Charleson A and Guisasola A 2016 Seismic isolation for architects. Routledge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  146. Han X and Marin-Artieda C 2015 A case study on the seismic protection of equipment using lead-rubber bearings. Struct. Congr. 2015 – Proc. 2015 Struct Congr. 1962–1974. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479117.169

  147. Zhou Z and Wei X 2016 Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Isolated Nuclear Power Plants in Frequency Domain. Shock Vib. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6127895

  148. Lee E, Jung D, Rhee I and Kim J 2021 A nonlinear soil-structure interaction analysis technique based on seismic isolation design response spectrum for seismically isolated nuclear structures with rigid basemat. Nucl. Eng. Des. 381: 111334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Kelly J M 1988 Base Isolation in Japan. Rep No UCB/EERC-88/ 20, Univ California, Berkeley, CA

  150. Zhou Z, Wong J and Mahin S 2016 Potentiality of using vertical and three-dimensional isolation systems in nuclear structures. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 48: 1237–1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2016.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Wang T and Wang F 2012 Three-dimensional base-isolation system using thick rubber bearings. 8341: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.916965

  152. Mo Y L, Witarto W, Chang K, Wang S J, Tang Y and Kassawara R P 2019 Periodic Material-Based Three-Dimensional (3D) Seismic Base Isolators for Small Modular Reactors. Con. Struct. in Earthq. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3278-4

  153. Witarto Witarto, Wang S J, Yang C Y, Wang J, Mo Y L, Chang K C and Tang Y 2019 Three-dimensional periodic materials as seismic base isolator for nuclear infrastructure. AIP Adv. 045014: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088609

  154. Forcellini D 2022 The assessment of the interaction between base isolation (BI) technique and soil structure interaction (SSI) effects with 3D numerical simulations. Structures. 45: 1452–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.09.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. He W, Qiao J, Xu H and Huang J 2023 Experiment investigation and dynamic responses of three-dimensional isolation system with high-static-low-dynamic stiffness. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 165: 107679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Liu Y, Li J and Lin G 2023 Seismic performance of advanced three-dimensional base-isolated nuclear structures in complex-layered sites. Eng. Struct. 289: 116247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. Dong W, Shi Y, Wang Q, Wang Y and Yan J B 2023 Development of a long-period vertical base isolation device with variable stiffness for steel frame structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 164: 107638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Ebisawa K, Ando K and Shibata K 2000 Progress of a research program on seismic base isolation of nuclear components. Nucl Eng Des. 198: 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00279-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Jung J W, Jang H W, Kim J H and Hong J W 2017 Effect of second hardening on floor response spectrum of a base-isolated nuclear power plant. Nucl Eng Des. 322: 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Kammerer A M, Whittaker A S and Constantinou M C 2019 Technical considerations for seismic isolation of nuclear facilities. NUREG/CR-7253.United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. (ML19050A422)

  161. Kumar M, Whittaker A S and Constantinou M 2019 Seismic isolation of nuclear power plants using sliding bearings. NUREG/CR-7254. United States Nucl. Regul. Commision, Washington, D.C. a

  162. Kumar M, Whittaker A S and Constantinou M C 2019 Seismic isolation of nuclear power plants using elastomeric bearings NUREG/CR-7255. United States Nucl. Regul. Commision, Washington, D.C.. ML19063A541) b

  163. NRC (National Research Council) 2003 ISC security design criteria. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  164. Huang Y and Whittaker A S 2009 Response of Conventional and Base-Isolated Nuclear Power Plants to Blast Loading. 20th Int Conf Struct Mech React Technol (SMiRT 20) Espoo, Finl. 1–10

  165. Zhang R and Phillips B M 2015 Performance and Protection of Base-Isolated Structures under Blast Loading. J Eng Mech. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889

  166. Kangda M Z and Bakre S 2018 The effect of LRB parameters on structural responses for blast and seismic loads. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 43: 1761–1776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2732-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Tolani S, Bharti S D, Shrimali M K and Vern S 2021 Performance of base-isolated RC building under surface blast loading. InResilient Infrastructure: Select Proceedings of VCDRR 2021: 503–511

    Google Scholar 

  168. Mei R, Li J, Lin G and Zhu X 2018 Dynamic assessment of the seismic isolation influence for various aircraft impact loads on the CPR1000 containment. Nucl Eng Technol. 50: 1387–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. Kangda M Z and Bakre S 2019 Positive-phase blast effects on base-isolated structures. Arab J Sci Eng. 44: 4971–4992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3667-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  170. Mohebbi M and Dadkhah H 2020 Optimal design of base isolation system under blast loading. Int. J. Optim. Civil Eng. 10(1): 101–115

    Google Scholar 

  171. Mei R, Li J, Lin G, Pan R and Zhu X 2020 Progress in Nuclear Energy Evaluation of the vibration response of third generation nuclear power plants with isolation technology under large commercial aircraft impact. Prog. Nucl. Energy. 120: 103230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. Wang Y, Chen Q, Zhao Z, Qiang H, Yang K and Wang X 2022 Design and performance evaluation framework for seismically isolated reinforcement concrete columns subjected to blast loads. Structures. 45: 2239–2252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  173. Gičev V, Trifunac M D and Todorovska M I 2021 Ambient vibration measurements in an irregular building. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 141: 106484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  174. Brownjohn J M W 2003 Ambient vibration studies for system identification of tall buildings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32: 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  175. Buckle I G and Mayes R L 1990 Seismic isolation: history, application, and performance—a world view. Earthq. Spectra. 6: 161–201. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  176. Kilar V, Petrovčič S, Koren D and Šilih S 2013 Cost viability of a base isolation system for the seismic protection of a steel high-rack structure. Int. J. Steel Struct. 13: 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-013-2005-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  177. Mitropoulou C C and Lagaros N D 2016 Life-cycle cost model and design optimization of base-isolated building structures. Front. Built Environ. 2: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2016.00027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. Villaverde R 2016 Base isolation with sliding hydromagnetic bearings: concept and feasibility study. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 13(6): 709–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1187634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  179. Wen J, Li X and Xie Q 2022 Cost-effectiveness of base isolation for large transformers in areas of high seismic intensity. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 18: 745–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1864413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  180. Islam A B M S and Sodangi M 2020 Rubber bearing isolation for structures prone to earthquake—a cost effectiveness analysis. Earthq. Struct. 19: 261–272. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.19.4.261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  181. Lal K M, Parsi S S, Kosbab B D, Ingersoll E D, Charkas H and Whittaker A S 2022 Towards standardized nuclear reactors: Seismic isolation and the cost impact of the earthquake load case. Nucl. Eng. Des. 386: 111487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. Ramirez C M and Miranda E 2007 Simplified analysis for preliminary design of base-isolated structures. New Horizons Better Pract. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/40946(248)52

  183. Harris J R and Heintz J A 2009 Quantification of building seismic performance factors. In: P695

  184. Wen P A N and Baifeng S U N 2008 Two step design method for base isolation structures. In: 14 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. pp 12–17

  185. Li H and Huo L 2010 Advances in structural control in civil engineering in China. Math. Probl. Eng. 2010: 23. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/936081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. Jain S K and Thakkar S K 2004 Application of base isolation for flexible buildings. In: 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering

  187. Ruiz S E 2018 Review of guidelines for seismic design of structures with damping systems. Open Civ. Eng. J. 12: 195–204. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501812010195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. Erickson T W and Altoontash A 2010 Base isolation for industrial structures; design and construction essentials. Struct. Congr. 1440–1451

  189. Villegas-jimenez O and Tena-colunga A 2000 Dynamic design procedure for the design of base isolated structures located on the mexican pacific coast. WCEE. 12: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  190. Ounis H M, Ounis A and Djedoui N 2019 A new approach for base isolation design in building codes. Asian J. Civ. Eng. 20: 901–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00153-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  191. Yenidogan C and Erdik M 2016 A comparative evaluation of design provisions for seismically isolated buildings. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 90: 265–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  192. Robinson W H and Tucker A G 1981 Test results for lead-rubber bearings for Wm. Clayton Building, Toe Toe Bridge and Waiotukupuna Bridge. Bull. New Zeal. Soc. Earthq. Eng. 14: 21–33. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.14.1.21-33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  193. Guo T, Wu E, Li A, Wei L and Li X 2012 Integral lifting and seismic isolation retrofit of great hall of Nanjing Museum. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 26: 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  194. Altalabani D, Hejazi F, Saifulnaz R and Aziz F N A 2021 Development of new rectangular rubber isolators for a tunnel-form structure subjected to seismic excitations. Structures. 32: 1522–1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  195. Zhao Z, Zhang R, Wierschem N E, Jiang Y Y and Pan C 2020 Displacement mitigation–oriented design and mechanism for inerter-based isolation system. J. Vib. Control. 27: 1991–2003. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546320951662

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  196. Losanno D, Ravichandran N, Parisi F, Calabrese A and Serin G 2021 Seismic performance of a Low-Cost base isolation system for unreinforced brick Masonry buildings in developing countries. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 141: 106501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  197. Yuan Y, Wei W and Ni Z 2021 Analytical and experimental studies on an innovative steel damper reinforced polyurethane bearing for seismic isolation applications. Eng. Struct. 239: 112254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  198. Chowdhury S, Banerjee A and Adhikari S 2021 Enhanced seismic base isolation using inertial amplifiers. Structures 33: 1340–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  199. Li Y and Li J 2019 Overview of the development of smart base isolation system featuring magnetorheological elastomer. Smart Struct. Syst. 24: 37–52. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2019.24.1.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  200. Nakamura Y, Saruta M, Wada A, Takeuchi T and Hikone S 2010 Development of the core-suspended isolation system. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1036

  201. Hosseini M and Farsangi E N 2012 Telescopic columns as a new base isolation system for vibration control of high-rise buildings. Earthquakes Struct. 3: 853–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  202. Karayel V, Yuksel E, Gokce T and Sahin F 2017 Spring tube braces for seismic isolation of buildings. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 16: 219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  203. Zhou Y, Chen P and Mosqueda G 2019 Analytical and numerical investigation of quasi-zero stiffness vertical isolation system. J. Eng. Mech. 145: 04019035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  204. Wei X, Zhang S J, Zhong L J and Li Y Z 2016 Introduction of the convex friction system (CFS) for seismic isolation. Struct. Control Heal Monit. 24(1): 1861. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc

    Article  Google Scholar 

  205. Forcellini D and Kalfas K N 2023 Inter-story seismic isolation for high-rise buildings. Eng Struct. 275: 115175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115175

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, 221005, India

    Dhirendra Patel, Gaurav Pandey, Vishal Kumar Mourya & Rajesh Kumar

Authors
  1. Dhirendra Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gaurav Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vishal Kumar Mourya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rajesh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhirendra Patel.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel, D., Pandey, G., Mourya, V.K. et al. Sustainable base isolation: a review of techniques, implementation, and extreme events. Sādhanā 49, 173 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-024-02511-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-024-02511-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation