Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental study on drag characteristics of sill and baffles in forced unsubmerged and submerged hydraulic jumps

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sills and baffles are appurtenances used to stabilize hydraulic jump in a stilling basin. The force acting on these appurtenances are characterized by the drag coefficient (CD). This paper describes experimental methods carried out in a rectangular channel to analyze the drag characteristics of sill and baffles in free (unsubmerged) and submerged hydraulic jumps. The sills and baffles were designed as per the USBR type III stilling basin guidelines. A calibrated loadcell connected to an Arduino board was used to measure the drag force. Errors in measurements are limited to 1%. The drag co-efficient was obtained for different Froude numbers (F1=U1/√gy1) pertaining to strong jump (4.5–9) for different relative position of sills (xS/y2) and baffles (xb/y2) from the nozzle of the sluice gate. Both forced (unsubmerged) and submerged jumps were investigated. It is seen that the drag coefficient of appurtenances in submerged jumps were lower than those in free jumps. This may be attributed to the reduction in wake size in submerged jumps. Comparisons of the experimental results of the sill with the previous theoretical studies are reasonable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CD :

Drag coefficient

C :

Local drag coefficient

FD :

Drag Force

Uj :

Efflux velocity in the wall jet

F1 :

Froude number

y1 :

Height of the nozzle for the wall jets, supercritical depth in free hydraulic jump

S:

Height of the sill per unit width

Hz:

Hertz

Hp:

Horsepower

Kw:

Kilo watt

Lj :

Length of the jump

Lsj :

Length of the submerged jump

Um :

Local maximum velocity in the wall jet

x:

Longitudinal distance

mm:

Millimeter

mV:

Milli volts

Sm :

Modified submergence

y0:

Opening of the gate

A:

Projected area

g:

Acceleration due to gravity

y2 :

Subcritical sequent depth

S:

Submergence factor

U1 :

Super critical mean velocity

yt :

Tail water depth

u:

Velocity at distance y from the wall

xb :

Distance from the toe of the jump to the position of the baffles in hydraulic jump for from the nozzle to the baffle in the wall jet.

xs :

Distance from the toe of the jump to the position of the sill in hydraulic jump or from the nozzle to the baffle in the wall jet.

s:

Subscript of the distance from the toe of the jump to the position of the sill in hydraulic jump or from the nozzle to the baffle in the wall jet.

Hg :

Depth of water behind the sluice gate

DSJ:

Deflected surface jet

RWJ:

Reattaching wall jet

References

  1. Bradley J N and Peterka A J 1957 Hydraulic design of stilling basins: Stilling basin with sloping apron (Basin V). J. Hydraul. Div. 83(5): 1405–1411

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weaver R W 1950 Discussion of Control of hydraulic jump by sills. Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng 115: 1003–1006

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rajaratnam N 1964 The forced hydraulic jump. Water Power 16(2): 14–19

    Google Scholar 

  4. Basco D R and Adams J R 1971 Drag forces on baffle blocks in hydraulic jumps. J. Hydraul. Div. 97(12): 2023–2035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McCorquodale John A and Regts E H 1968 A theory for the force hydraulic jump. Trans. Eng. Inst. Canada 11: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  6. Narayanan R and Schizas L S 1980 Force on sill of forced jump. J. Hydraul. Div. 106(7): 1159–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karki K S, Mishra S K and Babee A 1986 Prediction of drag force on baffle wall and blocks. Proceedings of 14th Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power Conference, Univ of Roorkee, India

  8. Hager W H and Li D 1992 Sill-controlled energy dissipator. J. Hydraul. Res. 30(2): 165–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Farhoudi J and Narayanan R 1991 Force on slab beneath hydraulic jump. J. Hydraul. Eng. 117(1): 64–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiorotto V and Rinaldo A 1992 Turbulent pressure fluctuations under hydraulic jumps. J. Hydraul. Res. 30(4): 499–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mudgal B V and Pani B S 2012 Drag characteristics of two-dimensional sills in forced hydraulic jumps. J. Hydraul. Eng. 138(5): 462–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellayn A F and Sun Z L 2012 Hydraulic jump basins with wedge-shaped baffles. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 13(7): 519–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ead S A and Rajaratnam N 2002 Plane turbulent wall jets in shallow tailwater. J. Eng. Mech. 128(2): 143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Habibzadeh A, Wu S, Ade F, Rajaratnam N and Loewen M R 2011 Exploratory study of submerged hydraulic jumps with blocks. J. Hydraul. Eng. 137(6): 706–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Habibzadeh A, Loewen M R and Rajaratnam N 2012 Performance of baffle blocks in submerged hydraulic jumps. J. Hydraul. Eng. 138(10): 902–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rajaratnam N 1965 Submerged hydraulic jump. J. Hydraul. Divis. 91(4): 71–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ibrahim M M 2017 Improve the efficiency of stilling basin using different types of blocks. Am. J. Eng. Res. (AJER) 6(8): 295–304

    Google Scholar 

  18. Padulano R, Fecarotta O, Del Giudice G and Carravetta A 2017 Hydraulic design of a USBR Type II stilling basin. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 143(5): 04017001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aydin M C and Ulu A E 2017 Numerical modelling of sluice gates with different sill types under submerged flow conditions. Bitlis Eren Univ. J. Sci. Technol. 7(1): 1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Al-Fatlawi T J, Al-Mansori N J and Othman N Y 2020 Laboratory study of stilling basin using trapezoidal bed elements. Przegląd Naukowy Inżynieriai Kształtowanie Środowiska 29(4): 409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hager W H and Hager W H 1992 Various Aspects of Stilling Basins. Energy Dissipators and Hydraulic Jump, 185–212

  22. Khanam and Mudgal 2017 Comparison of velocity profiles for free and submerged hydraulic jump. J. Ecol. Environ. Conserv. 23: 321–327

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wahlin B, Wahl T, Gonzalez-Castro JA, Fulford J and Robeson M 2005 Task committee on experimental uncertainty and measurement errors in hydraulic engineering: An update. In Impacts of global climate change. pp. 1–11

  24. Rajaratnam N and Murahari V 1971 A contribution to forced hydraulic jumps. J. Hydraul. Res. 9(2): 217–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mudgal B V 1994 Drag characteristics of sills in forced hydraulic jumps and energy loss in junction boxes. Ph.D Thesis – Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  26. Ohtsu I, Yasuda Y and Ishikawa M 1999 Submerged hydraulic jumps below abrupt expansions. J. Hydraul. Eng. 125(5): 492–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nisha Khanam.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khanam, N., Mudgal, B.V. & Menon, J. Experimental study on drag characteristics of sill and baffles in forced unsubmerged and submerged hydraulic jumps. Sādhanā 49, 41 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02383-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02383-x

Keywords

Navigation