Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of curing time and percentage of additive materials on unconfined compressive strength and California bearing ratio in sandy silt soil

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stability of sandy silt soils is important to increase the resistance of the foundations of the buildings and hydraulic structures in civil engineering projects. It seems that adding some materials with different percentages of addition can raise the values of the compressive strength. Present study carried out a series of experimental tests by using the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and California bearing ratio (CBR) in low plasticity sandy silt soils due to different additive materials such as cement, pozzolan cement, Confix Pr50, cement + one percent of the polypropylene fibers, Confix Pr50+25 percent of bentonite, Emaco S45, Galena, Galena+1 percent of lime, Galena+3 percent of lime. In total, 299 experiments have been performed in the soil mechanics laboratory of Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University (SRBIAU (. In order to investigate the effects of different additive percentages on compressive strength and strain variation, three values of additive materials were considered as 3, 5 and 7 percent. Furthermore, the UCS values and CBR numbers were measured during the time steps as 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days from the start point of the tests. Also, the values of the specific weight, porosity, humidity percent and unconfined compressive strength were measured over the considered time steps. In order to measure the mentioned values, the scaled volumes of experimental soils were dried in the oven and the values of specific weight, and humidity percent were calculated. Furthermore, the values of the unconfined compressive strength were measured by the related apparatus. The results indicate that the mixed soils with cement enhance the higher value of unconfined compressive strength and California bearing ratio such as solo cement, pozzolan cement and cement with one percent of the polypropylene; however, adding the Confix Pr50+25 percent of bentonite decreases the values of CBR marginally. Experimental sample soils with 3, 5 and 7 percent of the confix attained less values of UCS and CBR which can be deduced that confix material is not appropriate to raise the stability of the foundations in sandy silt soils. Finally, by employing the soil properties over the time, an equation has been proposed to estimate the unconfined compressive strength by using the non-regression technique. The accuracy of the proposed equation was calculated and the results indicated that the predicted values had a good agreement with observed data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

D 50 :

Mean effective diameter

G s :

Specific gravity

LL :

Liquid limit

PL :

Plastic limit

NP :

Nonpelastic

e :

Voids ratio

q u :

Unconfined compressive strength

c u :

Undrained cohesion

γ d :

Dry density

ω :

Moisture content

η :

Porosity

t :

Curing time period

C S :

Percentage of the additive materials

ε :

Axial strain

References

  1. Etxeberria M, Vázquez E, Marí A and Barra M 2007 Influence of amount of recycled coarse aggregates and production process on properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 37: 735–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Consoli N C, Cruz R C, Floss M F and Festugato L 2010 Parameters controlling tensile and compressive strength of artificially cemented sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136: 759–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zandieh A R and Yasrobi S S 2010 Study of factors affecting the compressive strength of sandy soil stabilized with polymer. GGE. 28: 139–145

    Google Scholar 

  4. Consoli N C, Rosa D A, Cruz R C and Dalla Rosa A 2011 Water content, porosity and cement content as parameters controlling strength of artificially cemented silty soil. Eng. Geol. 122: 328–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Consoli N C, Cruz R C and Floss M F 2011 Variables controlling strength of artificially cemented sand: influence of curing time. JMCE. 23: 692–696

    Google Scholar 

  6. Consoli N C, Cruz R C, Da Fonseca A V and Coop M R 2012 Influence of cement-voids ratio on stress-dilatancy behavior of artificially cemented sand. JGG Eng. 138: 100–109

    Google Scholar 

  7. Naeini S A, Naderinia B and Izadi E 2012 Unconfined compressive strength of clayey soils stabilized with waterborne polymer. KSCE Journal. 16: 943–949

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cardoso R, Ribeiro D and Néri R 2017 Bonding effect on the evolution with curing time of compressive and tensile strength of sand-cement mixtures. Soils and foundations. 57: 655–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abbasi N and Mahdieh M 2018 Improvement of geotechnical properties of silty sand soils using natural pozzolan and lime. Int. J. Geo-Eng. 9: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang T, Liu S, Zhan H, Ma C and Cai G 2020 Durability of silty soil stabilized with recycled lignin for sustainable engineering materials. J. Clean. Prod. 248: 119293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim S Y, Kim Y and Lee J S 2021 Effects of frozen water content and silt fraction on unconfined compressive behavior of fill materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 266: 120912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) 2002, ASTM D 1557-02

  13. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) 2002, ASTM D 422–63

  14. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) 2002, ASTM D 854–02

  15. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) 2002, ASTM D 4318-87

  16. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) 2002, ASTM D 2166-00

  17. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) 2002, ASTM D 1883-99

  18. Thomson M L 2005. Why is types hydrated lime special. Int. BLS. 9-11

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to SEYED HABIB MOUSAVI JAHROMI.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DAGHIGH, H., MOUSAVI JAHROMI, S.H., KHOSROJERDI, A. et al. Effect of curing time and percentage of additive materials on unconfined compressive strength and California bearing ratio in sandy silt soil. Sādhanā 47, 22 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01790-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01790-2

Keywords

Navigation