Skip to main content
Log in

On numerical moment-curvature relationship of a beam

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In complex bending problems involving material and geometric non-linearity, quite often moment-curvature based approach is preferred over stress-strain based methods. For such an approach, available uniaxial stress-strain test data or models are required to be converted into moment-curvature relationship. The process of con-version of uniaxial stress-strain relationship into a moment-curvature relationship is non-unique. And hence, complete moment-curvature law can be modelled suiting any of the several hardening laws. Such modelling will be very important when abeam is under cyclic load producing reverse plastic deformation. In this paper, an approach is presented to obtain a unique moment-curvature relationship from any given stress-strain law. Standard elasto-plastic models viz.elastic-perfectly plastic, isotropic and kinematic hardening are considered to produce corresponding unique moment-curvature relationships. The results indicate that an isotropic curvature hardening model, corresponding to an elastic perfectly plastic stress-strain model, would be erroneous. Additionally, step by step procedure of using the approach in solving a large deflection elasto-plastic beam problem, is demonstrated here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The developed method is stated to be explicit as; i. an explicit relation is developed between the applied force and the end-displacement which is generally absent in analytical or closed-form solutions obtained from elliptic integral method-based approaches, ii. the developed governing differential equation is linearized and solved using the Runge-Kutta 4th order initial value explicit solver with no iterations involved.

  2. The details of the elastica parameter can be found in [34].

Abbreviations

E:

Young’s modulus

H :

Kinematic hardening modulus

K:

Plastic modulus

\(\sigma _0\) :

Initial yield stress

\(\epsilon ^p\) :

Plastic strain

q :

Back stress

\(\alpha\) :

Non-negative internal hardening variable

\(f_j\) :

Yield function;the subscript index \(j=p,i,k\) indicate elastic perfectly plastic, isotropic and kinematic hardening models respectively

References

  1. Ghosh S and Roy D 2007 Numeric-analytic form of the adomian decomposition method for two-point boundary value problems in nonlinear mechanics.Journal of engineering mechanics, 133(10): 1124–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee, A Bhattacharya B and Mallik A K 2008 Large deflection of cantilever beams with geometric non-linearity: Analytical and numerical approaches. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 43(5): 366–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maleki Mohammad, Tonekaboni Seyed Ali Madani and Abbasbandy Saeid 2014 A homotopy analysis solution to large deformation of beams under static arbitrary distributed load. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(1): 355–368

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Batista Milan 2014 Analytical treatment of equilibrium configurations of cantilever under terminal loads using jacobi elliptical functions. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 51(13): 2308–2326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Corre Grégoire, Lebée Arthur, Sab Karam, Ferradi M K and Cespedes X 2020 A new higher-order elastoplastic beam model for reinforced concrete. Meccanica, 55(4): 791–813

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bathe Klaus-Jürgen and Bolourchi Said 1980 A geometric and material nonlinear plate and shell element. Computers & structures, 11(1-2): 23–48

  7. Spacone Enrico, Filippou Filip C and Taucer Fabio F 1996 Fibre beam–column model for non-linear analysis of r/c frames: Part i. formulation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 25(7): 711–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Feng De-Cheng and Xu Jun 2018 An efficient fiber beam-column element considering flexure–shear interaction and anchorage bond-slip effect for cyclic analysis of rc structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(11): 5425–5452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nallathambi Ashok Kumar, Lakshmana Rao C and Srinivasan Sivakumar M 2010 Large deflection of constant curvature cantilever beam under follower load. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 52(3): 440–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Li 2010 An integral approach for large deflection cantilever beams.International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 45(3): 301–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lofrano Egidio, Paolone Achille and Ruta Giuseppe 2013 A numerical approach for the stability analysis of open thin-walled beams. Mechanics Research Communications, 48: 76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bui Nghia Nam, Ngo M, Nikolic M, Brancherie Delphine and Ibrahimbegovic A 2014 Enriched timoshenko beam finite element for modeling bending and shear failure of reinforced concrete frames Computers & Structures, 143: 9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paulo João 2015 Pascon Numerical analysis of highly deformable elastoplastic beams. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 12(8): 1595–1615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bitar Ibrahim, Grange Stéphane, Kotronis Panagiotis and Benkemoun Nathan 2018 A comparison of displacement-based timoshenko multi-fiber beams finite element formulations and elasto-plastic applications. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 22(4):464–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Corre Grégoire, Lebée Arthur, Sab Karam, Ferradi Mohammed Khalil and Cespedes Xavier 2018 The asymptotic expansion load decomposition elastoplastic beam model. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 116(5): 308–331

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Gardiner Frank J 1957 The springback of metals. Trans. ASME, 79(1): 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hu Jack, Marciniak Zdzislaw and Duncan John 2002 Mechanics of sheet metal forming. Elsevier

  18. Natarajan A and Peddieson J 2011 Simulation of beam plastic forming with variable bending moments. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 46(1): 14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sazonov Edward and Klinkhachorn Powsiri 2005 Optimal spatial sampling interval for damage detection by curvature or strain energy mode shapes. Journal of sound and vibration, 285(4-5): 783–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ciambella J and Vestroni F 2015 The use of modal curvatures for damage localization in beam-type structures.Journal of Sound and Vibration, 340: 126–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khiem Nguyen Tien 2020 Mode shape curvature of multiple cracked beam and its use for crack identification in beam-like structures. Vietnam Journal of Mechanics

  22. Chiorean C G 2013 A computer method for nonlinear inelastic analysis of 3d composite steel–concrete frame structures. Engineering Structures 57: 125–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chiorean Cosmin G 2017 A computer method for moment-curvature analysis of composite steel-concrete cross-sections of arbitrary shape. Engineering Structures and Technologies, 9(1): 25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dhakal Suresh and Moustafa Mohamed A 2019 Mc-bam: Moment–curvature analysis for beams with advanced materials SoftwareX 9: 175–182

  25. Yoo Doo-Yeol, Banthia Nemkumar and Yoon Young-Soo 2017 Experimental and numerical study on flexural behavior of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete beams with low reinforcement ratios. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 44(1): 18–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Oller Sergio and Barbat Alex H 2006 Moment–curvature damage model for bridges subjected to seismic loads.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195(33-36): 4490–4511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brojan Miha, Videnic T and Kosel Franc 2009 Large deflections of nonlinearly elastic non-prismatic cantilever beams made from materials obeying the generalized ludwick constitutive law. Meccanica, 44(6): 733–739

  28. Liu Hua, Han Yi and Yang Jialing 2017 Large deflection of curved elastic beams made of ludwick type material. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 38(7): 909–920, 2017.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Patel Bhakti N, Pandit D and Srinivasan Sivakumar M 2017 Moment-curvature based elasto-plastic model for large deflection of micro-beams under combined loading. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 134: 158–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pandit Debojyoti and Srinivasan Sivakumar M 2020 Simulation of shape memory cycle of a polymeric beam undergoing large deflection using a simple incremental approach. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 31(4): 515–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pandit D and Srinivasan Sivakumar M 2016 An incremental approach for springback analysis of elasto-plastic beam undergoing contact driven large deflection. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 115: 24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pandit D and Chakraborty S 2019 Simulation of pseudo-elastic effect in a shape memory alloy beam. In: Proceedings of the 64th Congress of The Indian Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology, Bhubaneswar , India, December 9-12

  33. Simo Juan C and Hughes Thomas J R 2006 Computational inelasticity, volume 7. Springer Science & Business Media

  34. Pandit D, Thomas N, Patel Bhakti and Srinivasan S M 2015 Finite deflection of slender cantilever with predefined load application locus using an incremental formulation. CMC, 45, no. 2: 127–144

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chen Wai-Fah and Han Da-Jian 2007 Plasticity for structural engineers J. Ross Publishing

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D Pandit.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix I. Derivation of moment-curvature relationship for a circular cross-section following elastic-perfectly plastic law

Appendix I. Derivation of moment-curvature relationship for a circular cross-section following elastic-perfectly plastic law

In figure 8, the cross-section of area A is assumed to be elastic in the range \(-a\le Y \le a\) and elasto-plastic outside this range. The total moment M is given by:

$$\begin{aligned} {M}=\int _{A} {\sigma }\,\,Y\, \,dA \end{aligned}$$
(A1)
Figure 8
figure 8

The stress and strain state of a typical solid circular cross-section following elastic-perfectly plastic law.

The above equation corresponding to a circular cross-section reads:

$$\begin{aligned} {M}=4\int _{0}^{\frac{h}{2}} {\sigma }\,\,Y\sqrt{\frac{h^2}{4}-Y^2}\, \,dY \end{aligned}$$
(A2)

Using \(\sigma =E\epsilon\) and \(\epsilon =\kappa Y\) at \(Y=a\), a is determined to be:

$$\begin{aligned} a=\frac{\sigma _0}{E\kappa } \end{aligned}$$
(A3)

To perform the integration of Eq. A2, it is divided into elasic and elasto-plastic regions as given by:

$$\begin{aligned} {M}=4E\kappa \int _{0}^{a}Y^2\sqrt{\frac{h^2}{4}-Y^2}\, \,dY+4\sigma _0\int _{a}^{\frac{h}{2}} \,\,Y\sqrt{\frac{h^2}{4}-Y^2}\, \,dY \end{aligned}$$
(A4)

Using the following substitution: \(Y=\frac{h}{2}\sin {\theta }\), Eq.A3 and pertinent normalization, the above equation simplifies into Eq. 15.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pandit, D., Patel, B.N. On numerical moment-curvature relationship of a beam. Sādhanā 47, 27 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01782-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01782-2

Keywords

Navigation