Skip to main content
Log in

Machinability of Ti-5Al-2.5Sn for electro-discharge machining: an experimental investigation

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Present work attempts to investigate machinability of Ti-5Al-2.5Sn for Electro-Discharge Machining (EDM). Extent of machinability is determined through material removal efficiency, tool wear rate, and surface integrity of the EDMed specimen of Ti-5Al-2.5Sn. Detailed analysis of surface morphology followed by study of surface topographical features including surface roughness, crack density, thickness of the recast layer, foreign material migration, metallurgical phase, residual stress, and micro-indentation hardness are carried out. Disappointing morphology is noticed for EDMed work surface at higher values of peak current as well as pulse-on time values. It is experienced that occurrence of surface cracks depends on recast layer thickness. As compared to ‘as received’ workpiece exhibiting compressive residual stresses, tensile stresses are found induced after performing EDM operation. Similar phenomenon is experienced in case of tool electrode. EDM operation improves microhardness of the machined surface. For Ti-5Al-2.5Sn, such improvement is nearly three times than that of ‘as received’ work material. During EDM operation on Ti-5Al-2.5Sn, titanium carbide is formed over tool as well as work surface. Formation of such hard carbides may degrade machining efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen S L, Yan B H and Huang F Y 1999 Influence of kerosene and distilled water as dielectrics on the electric discharge machining characteristics of Ti–6A1–4V. J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 87(1–3): 107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yan B H, Tsai H C and Huang F Y 2005 The effect in EDM of a dielectric of a urea solution in water on modifying the surface of titanium. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 45(2): 194–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasçalık A and Çaydas U 2007 Electrical discharge machining of titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V). App. Surf. Sci. 253(22): 9007–9016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kao J Y, Tsao C C, Wang S S and Hsu C Y 2010 Optimization of the EDM parameters on machining Ti–6Al–4V with multiple quality characteristics. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 47(1–4): 395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yilmaz O and Okka M A 2010 Effect of single and multi-channel electrodes application on EDM fast hole drilling performance. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 51(1–4): 185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gu L, Li L, Zhao W and Rajurkar K P 2012 Electrical discharge machining of Ti6Al4V with a bundled electrode. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 53(1): 100–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang L and Du Y T 2014 Multi-objective optimization of green electrical discharge machining Ti–6Al–4V in tap water via grey-Taguchi method. Mater. Manuf. Process. 29(5): 507–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang X, Liu Z, Xue R, Tian Z and Huang Y 2014 Research on the influence of dielectric characteristics on the EDM of titanium alloy. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 72(5–8): 979–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shabgard M R and Alenabi H 2015 Ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Mater. Manuf. Process. 30(8): 991–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tiwary A P, Pradhan B B and Bhattacharyya B 2015 Study on the influence of micro-EDM process parameters during machining of Ti–6Al–4V superalloy. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 76(1–4): 151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shen Y, Liu Y, Dong H, Zhang K, Lv L, Zhang X, Zheng C and Ji R 2017 Parameters optimization for sustainable machining of Ti6Al4V using a novel high-speed dry electrical discharge milling. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 90(9–12): 2733–2740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsai M Y, Fang C S and Yen M H 2018 Vibration-assisted electrical discharge machining of grooves in a titanium alloy (Ti–6A–4V). Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1904-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Liang J F, Liao Y S, Kao J Y, Huang C H and Hsu C Y 2018 Study of the EDM performance to produce a stable process and surface modification. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 95(5–8): 1743–1750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khan M A R, Rahman M M and Kadirgama K 2015 An experimental investigation on surface finish in die-sinking EDM of Ti-5Al-2.5Sn. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 77(9–12): 1727–1740

  15. Khan M A R and Rahman M M 2017 Surface characteristics of Ti-5Al-2.5Sn in electrical discharge machining using negative polarity of electrode. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 92(1–4): 1–13

  16. Kumar S, Batish A, Singh R and Singh T P 2017 Machining performance of cryogenically treated Ti-5Al-2.5Sn titanium alloy in electric discharge machining: A comparative study. IMechE Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 231(11): 2017–2024

  17. Yuri T, Ono Y and Ogata T 2003 Effects of surface roughness and notch on fatigue properties for Ti-5Al-2.5Sn ELI alloy at cryogenic temperatures. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 4(4): 291–299

  18. Rajurkar K P and Pandit S M 1986 Formation and ejection of EDM debris. J. Eng. Industry 108(1): 22–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Soni J S 1994 Microanalysis of debris formed during rotary EDM of titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) and die steel (T215Cr12). Wear 177(1): 71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tamura T and Kobayashi Y 2004 Measurement of impulsive forces and crater formation in impulse discharge. J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 149(1–3): 212–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Patel M R, Barrufet M A, Eubank P T and DiBitonto D D 1989 Theoretical models of the electrical discharge machining process. II. The anode erosion model. J. Appl. Phys. 66(9): 4101–4111

  22. Toren M, Zvirin Y and Winograd Y 1989 Melting and evaporation phenomena during electrical erosion. J. Heat Transf. 97(4): 576–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Theisen W and Schuermann A 2004 Electro discharge machining of nickel–titanium shape memory alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 348(1–2): 200–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Puri A B and Bhattacharyya B 2005 Modeling and analysis of white layer depth in a wire-cut EDM process through response surface methodology. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 25(3–4): 301–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee H T, Hsu F C and Tai T Y 2004 Study of surface integrity using the small area EDM process with a copper–tungsten electrode. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 364(1–2): 346–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brinksmeier E, Konig W, Leskovar P, Peters J and Tonshoff H K 1982 Residual stress measurement and causes in machining process, Ann. CIRP. 31(2): 491–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lloyd H K and Warren R H 1965 Metallurgy of spark-machined surfaces. J. Iron Steel Inst. 203(3): 238–247

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ekmekci B, Elkoca O, Tekkaya A E and Erden A 2005 Residual stress state and hardness depth in electric discharge machining: de-ionized water as dielectric liquid. Mach. Sci. Technol.: Int. J. 9(1): 39–61

  29. Merklein M, Andreas K and Engel U 2011 Influence of machining process on residual stresses in the surface of cemented carbides. Proceedia Eng. 19: 252–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sidhu S S, Batish A and Kumar S 2013 Neural network–based modeling to predict residual stresses during electric discharge machining of Al/SiC metal matrix composites. IMechE Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 227(11): 1679–1692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rebelo J C, Dias A M, Kremer D and Lebrun J L 1998 Influence of pulse energy on the surface integrity of martensitic steels. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 84(1–3): 90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kruth J P and Bleys P 2000 Measuring residual stress caused by wire EDM of tool steel. Int. J. Electrical Mach. 5: 23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chow H M, Yan B H and Huang F Y 1999 Micro slit machining using electrodischarge machining with a modified rotary disk electrode (RDE). J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 91(1–3): 161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saurav Datta.

Appendix

Appendix

See figures 29, 30, 31, 32, 33.

Figure 29
figure 29

EDM set-up.

Figure 30
figure 30

Measurement of surface crack density. \( SCD = \frac{{\sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^{n} {L_{i} } }}{L \times B} = \frac{{0.61 \times 10^{ - 3} }}{0.25 \times 0.18} = 0.01355\frac{{{{\upmu m}}}}{{{{\upmu m}}^{2} }} \)

Figure 31
figure 31

Measurement of recast layer thickness. \( RLT = \frac{A}{L} = \frac{8660.36}{225} = 33.96\,\upmu{\text{m}} \)

Figure 32
figure 32

XRD spectra of worn-out electrode-tip (bottom surface) exhibiting peaks machining with selected pattern (Cu 01-1241).

Figure 33
figure 33

XRD spectra of worn-out electrode-tip (bottom surface) exhibiting peaks machining with selected pattern (TiC 73-0472).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jadam, T., Datta, S. Machinability of Ti-5Al-2.5Sn for electro-discharge machining: an experimental investigation. Sādhanā 45, 238 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01479-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01479-y

Keywords

Navigation