Abstract
Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) networks operating in millimeter wave frequency band bring promising solutions for the increased demand of future generation networks in terms of data rate, signal quality, power optimization and computational complexity. A joint beam-forming (JBF) system working concurrently on source–relay–destination nodes leads to faithful delivery of signals by mitigating the effect of interferences. The traditional JBF designs in MIMO networks yield power wastage due to undesirable participation of intermediate relay nodes for message forwarding. The computational delay in beam-forming (BF) matrix update is tedious in traditional systems. This paper proposes a novel design of power-optimized JBF that facilitates optimum relay selection for solving power wastage issues. The selected relays co-operate in BF with the power constraint, and all other relays are powered down and enter into sleeping mode. Modified Cuckoo-Search Optimization (MCSO) algorithm is used for relay selection and minimum mean square error algorithm is used for BF matrix calculation. The proposed JBF is able to maximize Achievable Sum Rate (ASR) for optimum value of transmission power. The maximum power efficiency is achieved for distant communication with the aid of selected relays contributing to maximizing the ASR value. The proposed work minimizes the sum of mean square error and concurrently computes optimum time slot for BF matrix update, and hence computational delay is reduced. Thus a hybrid optimization for power and time in JBF design is achieved with relay selection and it can be widely used in future generation networks for high-quality and interference-free communication.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- \(S_{1} \), \( S_{2} \) :
-
Source nodes
- N :
-
Total number of available relays
- \(S_{1}^{(t)}, S_{2}^{(t)}, S_{r}^{(t)} \) :
-
Signals transmitted by two source and relay nodes in time slot ‘t’
- \(n_{i}^{(t)}, n_{r}^{(t)} \) :
-
Noise interrupting at source and relay nodes in time slot ‘t’
- \(R_{i} \) :
-
\( i^\mathrm{th} \) relay used for beam-forming
- \(C_{i,r}^{(t)}, C_{r,i}^{(t)}\) :
-
CSI matrices between source and relay nodes in time slot ‘t’
- \(C_{i,i}^{(t)},C_{r,r}^{(t)}\) :
-
Loop-back channel matrices at source and relay nodes in time slot ‘t’
- \(y_{r}^{(t)}\) :
-
Received signal at relay in time slot ‘t’
- \({\hat{y}}_{r}^{(t)}\) :
-
Received signal at relay in time slot ‘t’ after SI suppression
- \({\hat{y}}_{l}^{(t)}\) :
-
Received signal at \(l^\mathrm{th}\) source node
- \(\Delta _{i,i}^{(t)}\) :
-
Channel estimation error at \( i^\mathrm{th} \) node in time slot ‘t’
- P:
-
Average transmission power
- \(a_{i}\) :
-
Scaling factor for power allocation to selected relay
- w:
-
AWGN at source nodes
- \(w_{i} \) :
-
AWGN at selected relay nodes
- \(\beta _{av} \) :
-
Average SNR
- \(P_{T} \) :
-
Total transmission power
- C:
-
Network capacity
- \( J_{m}^{(t)} \) :
-
MMSE function at time slot ‘t’
- \( \lambda ^{(t)} \) :
-
Lagrangian multiplier at time‘t’
- \( Z_{j}^{(t)} \) :
-
Receiver BF matrix at time ‘t’
- \( R_{i}^{(t)} \) :
-
Relay BF matrix at time ‘t’
- \(\alpha ^{(t)} \) :
-
Power amplification matrix
- \({\bar{R}}_{i}^{(t)} \) :
-
Beam steering direction vector
- \(N_{r} \) :
-
Selected number of relays
- \( N_{s} \) :
-
Number of communication nodes
- \( I_{N_{r}} \) :
-
Initialized BF vectors at receiver node
- \( I_{N_{s}} \) :
-
Initialized BF vectors at relay node
- m :
-
Time slot at which BF matrix update is done
- \({\hat{m}} \) :
-
Estimated optimum time slot at which BF matrix update is carried out
- l :
-
Source node index
- \(n_{r} \) :
-
Noise at relay node
- \(\sigma _{n}^{2}, \sigma _{e}^{2} \) :
-
Noise variance and loop-back channel estimation error variance
- \( p_{l} \) :
-
Power used at the source nodes
References
Quanzhong Li and Liang Yang 2019 Robust optimization for energy Efficiency in MIMO two-way relay networks with SWIPT. IEEE Syst. J. 14: 196–207
Ala Gouissem, Lutfi Samara, Ridha Hamila, Naofal Al-Dhahir and Sebti Foufou 2019 Multiple relay selection and beamforming in dual-hop amplify-and-forward relay networks. IEEE Syst. J. 13: 1534–1545
Ahmed Alkhateeb, Sam Alex, Paul Varkey, Ying Li, Qi Qu and Djordje Tujkovic 2018 Deep learning wave systems. IEEE Access 6: 37328–37348
Shim Y, Choi W and Park H 2016 Beamforming design for full-duplex two-way amplify-and-forward MIMO relay. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 15: 6705–6715
Guo T and Wang B 2016 Joint transceiver beamforming design for end-to-end optimization in full-duplex MIMO relay system with self-interference. IEEE Commun. Lett. 20: 1733–1736
Zhong C, Suraweera H A, Zheng G, Krikidis I and Zhang Z 2014 Wireless information and power transfer with full duplex relaying. IEEE Trans. Commun. 62: 3447–3461
Bletsas A, Khisti A, Reed D P and Lippman A 2006 A simple cooperative diversity method based on network path selection. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 24: 659-672
Liu X, Wen Z, Du N, Fan C and Tang X 2016 Robust source–relay beamforming for full-duplex relay networks with energy harvesting. In: Proceedings of Globecom Workshops, IEEE, pp. 1–6
Chen C, Bai L, Wu B and Choi J 2011 Relay selection and beamforming for cooperative bi-directional transmissions with physical layer network coding. IET Commun. 5: 2059-2067
Prerna Saxena and Kothari A G 2014 Performance analysis of adaptive beamforming algorithms for smart antennas. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Future Information Engineering. IERI Procedia 10: 131–137
Shu F, Zhou Y, Chen R, Wang J, Li J and Vucetic B 2017 High performance beamformer and low-complexity detector for DF-based full-duplex MIMO relaying networks. China Commun. 14: 17–182
Zhigang Wen, Xiaoqing Liu, Shuangyan Zheng and Wenxia Guo 2018 Joint source and relay design for MIMO two-way relay networks with SWIPT. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 67: 1–8
He Z, Lang Z, Rong Y and Qu S 2014 Joint transceiver optimization for two-way MIMO relay systems with MSE constraints. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 3: 613–616
Zheng G 2015 Joint beamforming optimization and power control for full duplex MIMO two-way relay channel. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 63: 555–566
Cui H, Ma M, Song L and Jiao B 2014 Relay selection for two-way full duplex relay networks with amplify-and-forward protocol. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 13: 3768–3777
Haiyan Guo, Zhen Yang, Yulong Zou and Theodoros Tsiftsis 2019 Secure beamforming for cooperative wireless-powered networks with partial CSI. IEEE Internet Things J. 6: 6760–6773
Quanzhong Li and Liang Yang 2019 Beamforming for cooperative secure transmission in cognitive two-way relay networks. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 15: 130–143
Khawaldeh Mohammad Kamel and Dia I Abu-Al-Nadi 2012 Design of wideband beamforming using particle swarm optimization. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Multi-Conf. Syst. Signals Dev. (SSD), vol. 2, pp. 25–32
Khodier M M and Christodoulou C G 2005 Linear array geometry synthesis with minimum side lobe level and null control using particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 53: 2674–2679
Garg A and Sahu O P 2015 Cuckoo search based optimal mask generation for noise suppression and enhancement of speech signal. J. King Saud Univ.-Comput. Inf. Sci. 27: 269–277
Choi W C, Choi S, Heo A and Park D J 2014 Joint optimization of source and relay for MIMO two-way relay networks using MSE duality. IEEE Commun. Lett. 18: 1246–1249
Joung J and Sayed A H 2010 Multiuser two-way amplify-and-forward relay processing and power control methods for beamforming systems. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 58: 1833–1846
Wang F, He X S, Wang Y and Yang S M 2012 Markov model and convergence analysis based on cuckoo search algorithm. Jisuanji Gongcheng/Comput. Eng. 38: 180-185
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
KURUPPATH, A., THIYYAKAT, S. Power- and time-optimized MMSE-based joint beam-forming with relay selection for future generation MIMO networks using Modified Cuckoo-Search Optimization algorithm. Sādhanā 45, 205 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01434-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01434-x