Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modelling and mitigation of single-event upset in CMOS voltage-controlled oscillator

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Single-event effects (SEEs) have been the primary concern in study of radiation effects since late 1970s with the discovery of soft errors in terrestrial and space environments. The interaction of a single ionized particle with electronic devices leads to SEEs. In this paper, single-event upset (SEU) on CMOS devices in designing of a voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) is analysed. Further, mitigation approaches of SEU are also discussed. To observe the impact of radiation, a VCO was designed in Cadence Virtuoso, and GDSII file of one ring oscillator stage was extracted to incorporate the same design in Silvaco MaskViews. With the help of layer map information file, masks were identified and used to design the CMOS inverter structure file for simulation of SEU condition. The input parameters for SEU simulation were evaluated from linear energy transfer (LET) graph of heavy ion under space conditions. The current profile of CMOS inverter was extracted under influence of a high-energy particle with the help of LET graph of that particle. This current profile was applied to different nodes of VCO and upset conditions were identified. Further, the impact of upset conditions on lock stage of phase-locked loop (PLL) is discussed. Results show that the SEU has significant impact on the logic state of inverters used in ring oscillator stage compared with current starving/biasing stage. The current profile of CMOS device has strong dependence on the energy of ion, its track, angle of incidence and the material. When angle of incidence is very less (\(7^{\circ }-14^{\circ }\)) the channel will be occupied by a funnel of charge and it leads to the maximum degradation of device. This work shows that a device operating at high frequency is more susceptible to SEU. Triple modular redundancy (TMR) and Radiation Hardened By Design (RHBD) can be used to mitigate SEU. TMR consumes more power and is less accurate compared with the RHBD approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramos A, Maestro J A and Reviriego P 2017 Characterizing a RISC-V SRAM-based FPGA implementation against Single Event Upsets using fault injection. Microelectron. Reliab. 78: 205–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Messenger G C and Ash M S 1997 Single event phenomena. New York: Chapman and Hall

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Iniewski K 2011 Radiation effects in semiconductor. New York: CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  4. Turner J E 2007 Atoms, radiation, and radiation protection. New York: Wiley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Glenn F K 2000 Radiation detection and measurement. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dodd P E and Massengill L W 2003 Basic upset mechanisms and modeling of single event upset in digital microelectronics. IEEE Trans. Nuclear Sci. 50: 583–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tianiqi W, Xiao L and Zhou B 2015 Single-event upset prediction in SRAMs account for on-transistor sensitive volume. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 62(6): 3207–3215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Loveless T D, Massengill L W, Bhuva B L, Holman W T, Witulski A F and Boulghassoul Y 2007 Modeling and mitigating single-event transients in voltage-controlled oscillators. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 54(6): 2561–2567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Patil R K and Nasre V G 2010 A performance comparison of current starved VCO and source coupled VCO for PLL in 0.18 \(\upmu \)m CMOS process. Int. J. Eng. Innov. Technol. 1(2): 48–52

    Google Scholar 

  10. Prajapati A and Prajapati P P 2014 Analysis of current starved voltage controlled oscillator using 45 nm CMOS technology. Int. J. Eng. Innov. Technol. 3(3): 8076–8081

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar R, Karkala V and Garg R 2009 A radiation tolerant phase locked loop design for digital electronics. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 56(6): 505–510

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boulghassoul Y, Massengill L W and Bhuva B L 2005 Effects of technology scaling on SET sensitivity of RF CMOS voltage-controlled oscillators. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 52(6): 2246–2432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cadence Virtuoso user manual [online]. http://www.cadence.com/products/cic/Pages/default.aspx

  14. Baker R J, Harry W L and David E B 2000 CMOS circuit design, layout and simulation. In: IEEE Press series on microelectronics systems, pp. 355–361, 383–387

  15. Silvaco Victory process user manual [online]. https://dynamic.silvaco.com/dynamicweb/jsp/downloads/DownloadManualsAction.do?req=silentmanuals&nm=victoryprocess

  16. Silvaco Athena user manual [Online]. https://dynamic.silvaco.com/dynamicweb/jsp/downloads/DownloadManualsAction.do?req=silentmanuals&nm=athena

  17. Silvaco Devedit user manual [online]. https://dynamic.silvaco.com/dynamicweb/jsp/downloads/DownloadManualsAction.do?req=silentmanuals&nm=devedit

  18. Silvaco Devedit3D user manual [online]. https://dynamic.silvaco.com/dynamicweb/jsp/downloads/DownloadManualsAction.do?req=silentmanuals&nm=devedit3d

  19. Silvaco Atlas user manual [online]. https://dynamic.silvaco.com/dynamicweb/jsp/downloads/DownloadManualsAction.do?req=silentmanuals&nm=atlas

  20. Zajic V and Thieberger P 1999 Heavy ion linear energy transfer measurements during single event upset testing of electronic devices. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 46(1): 59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. SRIM user manual [online]. http://www.srim.org/SRIM/Tutorials/Tutorials.htm

  22. Jung S M and Roveda J M 2015 A radiation-hardened-by-design phase-locked loop using feedback voltage controlled oscillator. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Quality Electron Design, Santa Clara, USA, pp. 103–106

  23. Jain C P 2014 Structural and electrical properties of modified CMOS device under radiation environment in designing of voltage control oscillator (VCO). In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovative Applications of Computational Intelligence on Power, Energy and Controls with their Impact on Humanity (CIPECH14), KIET, Ghaziabad, India, pp. 379–383

  24. Kauppila J S, Stenburg A L, Alles M L and Fransic A M 2009 A bias-dependent single-event compact model implemented into BSIM4 and a 90 nm CMOS process design kit. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci 56(6): 3152–3157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shukla S, Gill S S, Kaur N, Jatana H S and Nehru V 2017 Comparative simulation analysis of process parameter variations in 20 nm triangular FinFET. Active and Passive Electronic Components, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5947819): 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Semi-Conductor Laboratory (Department of Space), Government of India, for their support provided.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satyam Shukla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shukla, S., Gill, S.S., Jatana, H.S. et al. Modelling and mitigation of single-event upset in CMOS voltage-controlled oscillator. Sādhanā 43, 179 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0945-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0945-4

Keywords

Navigation