Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A statistical analysis on the leak detection performance of underground and overground pipelines with wireless sensor networks through the maximum likelihood ratio test

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leaks in pipelines of the oil and gas industry are an economic and environmental problem that needs to be detected early and effectively. Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have been researched as one of those technologies to be used in the remote monitoring of pipeline infrastructure. The idea of using tiny sensor nodes on pipelines seemingly provides industries with effective and reliable real-time monitoring, and better coverage density per area. The benefits are apparent in the deployment of WSNs for pipeline monitoring. However, what really lacks is an actual comparison in the detection performance between deployment in overground pipelines and underground pipelines. Extensive research has been going on the use of wireless underground sensor networks for a number of applications. This paper attempts to provide a statistical insight on the concepts of leak detection performance of WSNs when deployed on overground and underground pipelines. The approach in the study employs the hypothesis testing problem to formulate a solution on the detection plan. Through the hypothesis test, the maximum likelihood ratio scheme is used to provide an optimal performance analysis of the detection idea. The test also takes into consideration the signal to noise ratio performance of the two settings of underground and overground and is crucial in bringing up a conjecture on the performance of detection. As would be shown in the paper, thresholds, determined by probability, are the key in ensuring a good detecting performance for the WSN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Golmohamadi M 2015 Pipeline leak detection. Master of Science in Computer Engineering Thesis. USA: Missouri University of Science and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chis T 2007 Pipeline leak detection techniques. Ann. Univ. Tibiscus Comput. Sci. Ser. 5: 25–34

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eboh M 2016 Nigeria bleeds as pipeline bombings, vandalism wreaks economy. Nigeria: Vanguard Media Limited

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vanguard News 2016 FG records N2trn loss to militancy, pipeline vandalism in 2016 – NNPC. Nigeria: Vanguard Media Limited

    Google Scholar 

  5. Golshan M, Ghavamian A and Abdulshaheed A M A 2016 Pipeline monitoring system by using wireless sensor network. IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng. 13(3): 43–53

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rashid S, Qaisar S, Saeed H and Felemban E 2014 A method for distributed pipeline burst and leakage detection in wireless sensor networks using transform analysis. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 10(7): DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/939657

  7. Du R 2016 Wireless sensor networks in smart cities: the monitoring of water distribution networks case. Licentiate Thesis. Sweden: School of Electrical Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology

  8. Akyildiz I F and Stuntebeck E P 2006 Wireless underground sensor networks: research challenges. Elsevier Ad Hoc Netw. J. 4: 669–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Akyildiz I F, Sun Z and Vuran M C 2009 Signal propagation techniques for wireless underground communication networks. Elsevier Phys. Commun. J. 2(3): 167–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Passerini A 2010–2011 Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian parameter estimation. Available from http://disi.unitn.it/~passerini/teaching/2010-2011/MachineLearning/slides/06_07_bayesian_learning/talk.pdf

  11. Wikipedia 2017 Maximum likelihood estimation. Available from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_likelihood_estimation

  12. Pnev A B, Zhirnov A A, Stepanov K V, Nesterov E T,Shelestov D A and Karasik V E 2015 Mathematical analysis of marine pipeline leakage monitoring system based on coherent OTDR with improved sensor length and sampling frequency. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 584

  13. Yu X, Han W and Zhang Z 2015 Survey on a novel wireless sensor network communication at 433 MHz frequency. Int. J. u- e-Serv. Sci. Technol. 8(7): 223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li L, Vuran M C and Akyildiz I F 2007 Characteristics of underground channel for wireless underground sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop, Corfu, Greece, June 12–15

  15. Can Vuran M and Silva A R 2009 Communication through soil in wireless underground sensor networks – theory and practice, Springer Sensor Networks, Signals and Communication Technology, pp. 309–347

    Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Kadi T, Al-Tuwaijri Z and Al-Omran A 2013 Wireless sensor networks for leakage detection in underground pipelines: a survey paper. Elsevier Proc. Comput. Sci. 21: 491–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vuran M C and Akyildiz I F 2010 Channel model and analysis for wireless underground sensor networks in soil medium. Elsevier Phys. Commun. 3: 245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun Z, Wang P, Vuran M C, Al-Rodhaan M A, Al-Dhelaan A M and Akyildiz I F 2011 MISE-PIPE: magnetic induction-based wireless sensor networks for underground pipeline monitoring. Elsevier Ad Hoc Netw. 9: 218–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Christodoulou S, Agathokleous A, Kounoudes A and Milis M 2010 Wireless sensor networks for water loss detection. Eur. Water 30: 41–48

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nawaz F and Rehman K 2016 Remote pipeline monitoring using wireless sensor networks. J. Netw. Technol. 7(4): 112–121

    Google Scholar 

  21. Boaz L, Kaijage S and Sinde R 2014 Wireless sensor node for gas pipeline leak detection and location. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 100(18): 29–33

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meeravali S and Anusha A 2012 Detection of gas leak and its location using wireless sensors. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 1(9): 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  23. Golshan M, Ghavamian A, Mohammed A and Abdulshaheed A 2016 Pipeline monitoring system by using wireless sensor network. IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng. 13(3): 43–53

    Google Scholar 

  24. Andrey Somov, Alexander Baranov, Denis Spirjakin, Andrey Spirjakin, Vladimir Sleptsov, Roberto Passerone 2013 Deployment and evaluation of a wireless sensor network for methane leak detection. Elsevier Sens. Actuators A: Phys. 202(1): 217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stoianov I, Nachman L, Madden S and Tokmouline T 2007 PIPENET: a wireless sensor network for pipeline monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 6 th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 264–273

  26. Crossbow MICAz wireless measurement system. Available from: http://www.openautomation.net/uploadsproductos/micaz_datasheet.pdf

  27. Penty R and Lee M 2013 Keystone XL pipe shuns infrared sensors to detect leaks. Available from: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-06-17/keystone-xl-pipeline-shuns-high-tech-oil-spill-detectors

  28. Koskiahde J 2011 Decentralized detection in realistic sensor networks. Master of Science in Technology Thesis, School of Electrical Engineering, Aalto University

  29. Bajoivć D, Sinopoli B and Xavier J 2009 Sensor selection for hypothesis testing in wireless sensor networks: a Kullback–Leibler based approach. In: Proceedings of the 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2009, held jointly with the 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference, CDC/CCC 2009, Shanghai, pp. 1659–1664

  30. Nandi M, Nayak A, Roy B and Sarkar S 2015 Hypothesis testing and decision theoretic approach for fault detection in wireless sensor networks. Computing Research Repository

  31. Le Cam L 1986 The central limit theorem around 1935. Stat. Sci. 1(1): 78–91

  32. Johnson D Introduction to detection theory. Available from: www.ece.iastate.edu/~namrata/EE527_Spring08/l5.pdf

  33. Penn State Eberly College of Science Lesson 56: likelihood ratio tests. Available from: https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat414/node/309

  34. Statleck Maximum likelihood—hypothesis testing. In: The digital textbook. Available from: https://www.statlect.com/fundamentals-of-statistics/maximum-likelihood-hypothesis-testing

  35. Breysse P N and Lees P S J 2006 Noise. Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health. Available from: http://ocw.jhsph.edu/courses/PrinciplesIndustrialHygiene/PDFs/Lecture6.pdf

  36. Penn State Courses 2009 Outdoor sound propagation. Available from: http://pcfarina.eng.unipr.it/Public/Acoustics-Course/Penn-State-Course/10_osp.pdf

  37. International Standard Organization 1996 Acoustics—attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors—part 2: general method of calculation. Available from: https://www.saiglobal.com/PDFTemp/Previews/OSH/ISO/ISO_12345_06-02/T020649E.PDF

  38. UCSB Experimental Cosmology Group 2010 Acoustics (Chapter 16). Santa Barbara: University of California. Available from: http://www.deepspace.ucsb.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/033_Chapter-16-lecture-PML.pdf

  39. Wooldridge J M 2015 Introductory econometrics: a modern approach, 6th ed. South-Western, Cengage Learning, Ohio, USA, p. 83. Available from: https://books.google.com.ng/books

  40. Rabi M, Stabellini L, Proutiere A and Johansson M 2010 Networked estimation under contention-based medium access. Int. J. Robust Nonlin. Control 20(2): 140–155

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Ovchinnikov A L and Lapshin B M 2016 Low-frequency acoustic signals propagation in buried pipelines. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 671

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronic Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria

    Chinedu Duru & Cosmas Ani

Authors
  1. Chinedu Duru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cosmas Ani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chinedu Duru.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duru, C., Ani, C. A statistical analysis on the leak detection performance of underground and overground pipelines with wireless sensor networks through the maximum likelihood ratio test. Sādhanā 42, 1889–1899 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-017-0731-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-017-0731-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation