Skip to main content
Log in

Structural damage detection using ARMAX time series models and cepstral distances

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel damage detection algorithm for structural health monitoring using time series model is presented. The proposed algorithm uses output-only acceleration time series obtained from sensors on the structure which are fitted using Auto-regressive moving-average with exogenous inputs (ARMAX) model. The algorithm uses Cepstral distances between the ARMAX models of decorrelated data obtained from healthy and any other current condition of the structure as the damage indicator. A numerical model of a simply supported beam with variations due to temperature and operating conditions along with measurement noise is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed damage diagnostic technique using the ARMAX time series models and their Cepstral distances with novelty indices. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated using the benchmark data of the 8-DOF system made available to public by the Engineering Institute of LANL and the simulated vibration data obtained from the FEM model of IASC-ASCE 12-DOF steel frame. The results of the studies indicate that the proposed algorithm is robust in identifying the damage from the acceleration data contaminated with noise under varied environmental and operational conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lynch J P, Sundararajan A, Law K H, Kiremidjian A S and Carryer E 2004 Embedding damage detection algorithms in a wireless sensing unit for attainment of operational power efficiency. Smart Mater. Struct. 13(4): 800–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Straser E G and Kiremidjian A S 1998 Modular wireless damage monitoring system for structures, Report No. 128, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

  3. Doebling S W, Farrar C R, Prime M B and Shevitz D W 1996 Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-13070-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Sohn H, Farrar C R, Hunter H F and Worden K 2001 Applying the LANL statistical pattern recognition paradigm for structural health monitoring to data from a surface-effect fast patrol boat, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-13761-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Sohn H and Farrar C R 2001 Damage diagnosis using time series analysis of vibration signals. Smart Mater. Struct. 10: 446–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fassois S D and Sakellariou J S 2007 Time series methods for fault detection and identification in vibrating structures. Roy. Soc. Philos. Trans.: Math., Phys. Eng. Sci. 365: 411–448

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Ljung L 1999 System identification: Theory for the user. 2nd edn, Prentice Hall

  8. Carden E P and Brownjohn J M 2008 Arma modelled time series classification for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 22(2): 295–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Q W 2007 Statistical damage identification for bridges using ambient vibration data. Comput. Struct. 85: 476–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bodeux J B and Golinval J C 2001 Application of ARMAV models to the identification and damage detection of mechanical and civil engineering structures. Smart Mater. Struct. 10: 479–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zheng H and Mita A 2007 Two stage damage diagnosis based on the distance between arma models and prewhitening filters. Smart Mater. Struct. 16: 1829–1836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sakellariou J S and Fassois S D 2006 Stochastic output error vibration based damage detection and assessment in structures under earthquake excitation. J. Sound Vib. 297: 1048–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fung Eric H K, Wong Y K, Ho H F and Mignolet Marc P 2003 Modelling and prediction of machining errors using ARMAX and NARMAX structures. Appl. Math. Modell. 27: 611–627

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhenhua Xing Y Z and Akira Mita 2012 A substructure approach to local damage detection of shear structure. Struct. Control Health Monit. 19(2): 309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ay Ali M and Wang Ying 2014 Structural damage identification based on self-fitting ARMAX model and multi-sensor data fusion. Struct. Health Monit. 13(4): 445–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oppenheim A V and Schafer R W 1975 Digital signal processing. Prentice-Hall, London, UK

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Luke Dosiek and John W Pierre 2013 Estimating electromechanical modes and mode shapes using the multichannel ARMAX model. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28(2): 1950–1959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Martin R J 2000 A metric for ARMA processes. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 48: 1164–1170

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. http://institute.lanl.gov/ei/software-and-data

  20. Johnson E A, Lam H F, Katafygiotis L S and Beck J L 2004 Phase I IASC-ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark problem using simulated data. J. Eng. Mech.130: 3–15. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:1(3)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Futao Zhu and Yunjie Wu 2014 A rapid structural damage detection method using integrated ANFIS and interval modeling technique. Appl. Soft Comput. 25: 473–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nair K K, Kiremidjian A S and Law A S 2006 Time series-based damage detection and localization algorithm with application to the ASCE benchmark structure. J. Sound Vib. 291: 349–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bernal D and Gunes B 2004 Flexibility based approach for damage characterization: benchmark application. J. Eng. Mech.-ASCE 130: 61–70

  24. Hera A and Hou Z K 2004 Application of wavelet approach for ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark studies. J. Eng. Mech.-ASCE 130: 96–104

  25. Ding Y, Li A and Liu T 2008 A study on the WPT-based structural damage alarming of the ASCE benchmark experiments. Adv. Struct. Eng. 11: 121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ching J 2004 New Bayesian model updating algorithm applied to a structural health monitoring benchmark. Struct. Health Monit. 3: 313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin S, Yang J N and Zhou L 2005 Damage identification of a benchmark building for structural health monitoring. Smart Mater. Struct. 14: S162–S169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chase J G, Begoc V and Barroso L R 2005 Efficient structural health monitoring for a benchmark structure using adaptive RLS filters. Comp. Struct. 83: 639–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yan A M, Kerschen G, De Boe P and Golinval J C 2005 Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions—Part I: A linear analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process.19: 847–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This paper is being published with the permission of the director, CSIR-Structural Engineering Research Centre, Taramani, Chennai.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K Lakshmi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lakshmi, K., Rama Mohan Rao, A. Structural damage detection using ARMAX time series models and cepstral distances. Sādhanā 41, 1081–1097 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-016-0534-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-016-0534-3

Keywords

Navigation