Skip to main content
Log in

Rough set based decision rule generation to find behavioural patterns of customers

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rough sets help in finding significant attributes of large data sets and generating decision rules for classifying new instances. Though multiple regression analysis, discriminant analysis, log-it analysis and several other techniques can be used for predicting results, they consider insignificant information also for processing which may lead to false positives and false negatives. In this study, we proposed rough set based decision rule generation framework to find reduct and to generate decision rules for predicting the Decision class. We conducted experiments over data of Portuguese Banking institution. From the proposed method, the dimensionality of data is reduced and decision rules are generated which predicts deposit nature of customers by 90% accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deger A and Adem A 2011 Bank specific and macroeconomic determinants of commercial bank profitability—empirical evidence from Turkey. Bus. Econ. Res. J. 2: 139–152

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sergio M and Paulo C 2014 A data-driven approach to predict the success of bank telemarketing. Decis. Support Syst. 62(2014): 22–31

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joaquin A, Rebecca M B and Frank P A C 2014 Classification with decision trees from a nonparametric predictive inference perspective. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 71(2014): 789–802

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Mu-Yen C 2011 Predicting corporate financial distress based on integration of decision tree classification and logistic regression. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(2011): 11261–11272

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pawlak Z 2002 Rough set theory and its applications. J. Telecommun. Inf. Technol. 3: 7–10

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eric C C T, Chen D and Daniel S Y 2008 Approximations and reducts with covering generalized rough sets. Comput. Math. Appl. 56(2008): 279–289

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Francis E H T and Lixiang S 2002 Economic and financial prediction using rough sets model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 141(2002): 641–659

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. You-Shyang C 2012 Classifying credit ratings for Asian banks using integrating feature selection and the CPDA-based rough sets approach. Knowl. Based Syst. 26(2012): 259–270

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hsu-Hao Y and Chang-Lun W 2009 Rough sets to help medical diagnosis—Evidence from a Taiwan’s clinic. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(2009): 9293–9298

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duoqian M, Qiguo D and Hongyun Z 2009 Rough set based hybrid algorithm for text classification. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(2009): 9168–9174

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zuqiang M and Zhongzhi S 2012 Extended rough set-based attribute reduction in inconsistent incomplete decision systems. Inf. Sci. 204(2012): 44–69

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Changzhong W, Mingwen S, Baiqing S and Qinghua H 2015 An improved attribute reduction scheme with covering based rough sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 26: 235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jia-yang W and Jie Z 2009 Research of reduct features in the variable precision rough set model. Neurocomputing 72: 2643–2648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Malcolm B 2001 Reducts within the variable precision rough sets model A further investigation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 134(2001): 592–605

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Radaideh Q A, Sulaiman M N, Selamat M H and Ibrahim H 2005 Approximate reduct computation by rough sets based attribute weighting. IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, vol 2, pp 383–386

  16. Wang P-C 2011 Efficient hash-based approximate reduct generation. IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, Kaohsiung, pp 703–707

  17. Asuncion A and Newman D 2012 University of California, School of Information and Computer Science, UCI machine learning repository. Irvine

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P Uma Sankar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sumalatha, L., Uma Sankar, P. & Sujatha, B. Rough set based decision rule generation to find behavioural patterns of customers. Sādhanā 41, 985–991 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-016-0528-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-016-0528-1

Keywords

Navigation