Abstract
We study the ground-state and magnetic hysteresis properties of 2d arrays (\(L^{}_x\times L^{}_y\)) of dipolar interacting magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) by performing micromagnetic simulations. Our primary interest is to understand the effect of sample shape, \(\Theta \), the ratio of the dipolar strength to the anisotropy strength and the direction of the applied field \(\vec {H} = H_{0}{\hat{e}}^{}_H\) on the ground state and the magnetic hysteresis in an array of MNPs. To study the effect of the shape of the sample, we have varied the aspect ratio \(A^{}_r=L^{}_y/L^{}_x\), which in turn, is found to induce shape anisotropy in the system. Our main observations are: (a) When the dipolar interaction is strong \((\Theta >1)\), the ground-state morphology has an in-plane ordering of magnetic moments, (b) the ground-state morphology has randomly oriented magnetic moments that are robust regarding system sizes and \(A^{}_r\) for weakly interacting MNPs (\(\Theta <1\)), (c) micromagnetic simulations suggest that the dipolar interaction decreases the coercive field \(H^{}_c\), (d) the remanence magnetisation \(M^{}_r\) is found to be strongly dependent not only on the strength of dipolar interaction but also on the shape of the sample and (e) due to the anisotropic nature of dipolar interaction, a strong shape anisotropy effect is observed when the field is applied along the long axis of the sample. In such a case, the dipolar interaction induces an effective ferromagnetic coupling when the aspect ratio is enormous. These results are of vital importance in high-density recording systems, magneto-impedance sensors, etc.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L Wu, A Mendoza-Garcia, Q Li and S Sun, Chem. Rev. 116(18), 10473 (2016)
K Ulbrich, K Hola, V Subr, A Bakandritsos, J Tucek and R Zboril, Chem. Rev. 116(9), 5338 (2016)
A Hervault and N T K Thanh, Nanoscale 6(20), 11553 (2014)
R Bustamante, A Millán, R Piñol, F Palacio, J Carrey, M Respaud, R Fernandez-Pacheco and N J O Silva, Phys. Rev. B 88(18), 184406 (2013)
C A Schütz, L Juillerat-Jeanneret, H Mueller, I Lynch and M Riediker, Nanomedicine 8(3), 449 (2013)
J L Déjardin, A Franco, F Vernay and H Kachkachi, Phys. Rev. B 97(22), 224407 (2018)
P Capiod, L Bardotti, A Tamion, O Boisron, C Albin, V Dupuis, G Renaud, P Ohresser and F Tournus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(10), 106802 (2019)
V F Puntes and K M Krishnan, IEEE Trans. Mag. 37(4), 2210 (2001)
J Jordanovic, M Beleggia, J Schiøtz and C Frandsen, J. Appl. Phys. 118(4), 043901 (2015)
Z Zhong, B Gates, Y Xia and D Qin, Langmuir 16(26), 10369 (2000)
R Cowburn, A Adeyeye and M Welland, New J. Phys. 1(1), 16 (1999)
M Anand, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 522, 167538 (2021)
M Pardavi-Horvath, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 177, 213 (1998)
A Mohtasebzadeh, L Ye and T Crawford, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16(8), 19769 (2015)
D Xue and Z Yan, J. Appl. Phys. 100(10), 103906 (2006)
U Löw, V Emery, K Fabricius and S Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72(12), 1918 (1994)
K De’Bell, A MacIsaac, I Booth and J Whitehead, Phys. Rev. B 55(22), 15108 (1997)
E Edlund and M N Jacobi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105(13), 137203 (2010)
M Anand, V Banerjee and J Carrey, Phys. Rev. B 99(2), 024402 (2019)
A P Alivisatos, Science 271(5251), 933 (1996)
C Collier, R Saykally, J Shiang and S Henrichs, J. Health Sci. 277(5334), 1978 (1997)
D Kechrakos and K Trohidou, Phys. Rev. B 71(5), 054416 (2005)
N Usov, O Serebryakova and V Tarasov, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12(1), 489 (2017)
L C Branquinho, M S Carrião, A S Costa, N Zufelato, M H Sousa, R Miotto, R Ivkov and A F Bakuzis, Sci. Rep. 3, 2887 (2013)
M Anand, J. Appl. Phys. 128(2), 023903 (2020)
Y Li, T Wang, H Liu, f Dai, X Yu and G Liu, J. Nanomater. 16(1), 331 (2015)
B Yang and Y Zhao, J. Appl. Phys. 110(10), 103908 (2011)
M Morales-Meza, P P Horley, A Sukhov and J Berakdar, The Eur. Phys. J. B 87(8), 186 (2014)
F Chinni, F Spizzo, F Montoncello, V Mattarello, C Maurizio, G Mattei and L D Bianco, Materials 10(7), 717 (2017)
B Faure et al, Nanoscale 5(3), 953 (2013)
R Moskowitz and E Della Torre, IEEE Trans. Magn. 2(4), 739 (1966)
G Held, G Grinstein, H Doyle, S Sun and C Murray, Phys. Rev. B 64(1), 012408 (2001)
D Kechrakos and K Trohidou, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 8(6), 2929 (2008)
M J Donahue and D G Porter, Technical Report (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 1999) vol. 29, p. 53
M Anand, J Carrey and V Banerjee, Phys. Rev. B 94(9), 094425 (2016)
M Anand, J Carrey and V Banerjee, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 454, 23 (2018)
S Bedanta and W Kleemann, J. Phys. D 42(1), 013001 (2008)
C Haase and U Nowak, Phys. Rev. B 85(4), 045435 (2012)
M Schabes and A Aharoni, IEEE Trans. Magn. 23(6), 3882 (1987)
V Russier, J. Appl. Phys. 89(2), 1287 (2001)
C C Dantas and L A de Andrade, Phys. Rev. B 78(2), 024441 (2008)
J Carrey, B Mehdaoui and M Respaud, J. Appl. Phys. 109(8), 083921 (2011)
A Bailly-Reyre and H T Diep, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 528, 167813 (2021)
M Anand, arXiv:2104.02961 (2021)
E C Stoner and E Wohlfarth, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A Math. Phys. Sci. 240(826), 599 (1948)
G Wysin, Demagnetisation fields, available on https://www.phys.ksu.edu/personal/wysin/notes/demag.pdf (2012)
A García-Arribas, E Fernández, A V Svalov, G V Kurlyandskaya, A Barrainkua, D Navas and J M Barandiaran, Eur. Phys. J. B 86(4), 136 (2013)
Acknowledgements
Most of the numerical simulations presented in this work have been carried out in the Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi. The author is grateful to Prof Varsha Banerjee for providing the computational facility at IIT Delhi.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anand, M. Dipolar interaction and sample shape effects on the hysteresis properties of 2d array of magnetic nanoparticles. Pramana - J Phys 95, 181 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-021-02222-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-021-02222-w