Skip to main content
Log in

Nuclear triaxiality in the A ∼ 160–170 mass region: the story so far

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 26 November 2014

Abstract

Research in nuclear triaxial deformation has revealed many exciting facts and figures over the last one and a half-decades. Although wobbling motion of nuclei was experimentally discovered at the beginning of the last decade, after almost 25 years of its prediction by Bohr and Mottelson, efforts are still being put to understand this rare nuclear phenomenon in greater detail. The concept of transverse wobbling is one such recent attempt which successfully explains the evolution of experimentally observed wobbling frequency with spin. The population of triaxial strongly deformed (TSD) bands in the A ∼160–170 region is favoured for which neutron number (N=92 or 94) is a topic of current debate. Experimental efforts are being put following Bengtsson’s calculations which indicate that the elevated yrast lines for N=92 isotones favour TSD population. In A ∼170 mass region, the ambiguity over the real character of certain strongly deformed bands has recently been removed by extensive experimental and theoretical efforts, and the bands have now been firmly established as either enhanced deformed (ED) or superdeformed (SD).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S W Ødegård et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5866 (2001)

  2. D R Jensen et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 142503 (2002)

  3. G Schönwa ßer et al, Phys. Lett. B 552, 9 (2003)

  4. H Amro et al, Phys. Lett. B 553, 197 (2003)

  5. D J Hartley et al, Phys. Rev. C 80, 041304(R) (2009)

  6. P Bringel et al, Eur. Phys. J. A 24, 167 (2005)

  7. D J Hartley et al, Phys. Rev. C 83, 064307 (2011)

  8. R Bengtsson and H Ryde, Eur. Phys. J. A 22, 355 (2004)

  9. I Y Lee, Nucl. Phys. A 520, 641 (1990)

  10. J C Marsh et al, Phys. Rev. C 88, 041306(R) (2013)

  11. A Neußer-Neffgen et al, Phys. Rev. C 73, 034309 (2006)

  12. M K Djongolov et al, Phys. Lett. B 560, 24 (2003)

  13. D T Scholes et al, Phys. Rev. C 70, 054314 (2004)

  14. Y C Zhang et al, Phys. Rev. C 76, 064321 (2007)

  15. J Wells and N Johnson, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Report No. ORNL-6689, 1991 (unpublished)

  16. S Mukhopadhyay et al, Phys. Rev. C 83, 044311 (2011)

  17. E F Moore et al, Phys. Rev. C 55, 2150(R) (1997)

  18. D J Hartley et al, Phys. Lett. B 608, 31 (2005)

  19. I Hamamoto and G B Hagemann, Phys. Rev. C 67, 014319 (2003)

  20. S Frauendorf and F Dönau, Phys. Rev. C 89, 014322 (2014)

  21. J T Matta et al, to be published

Download references

Acknowledgements

The ANL operation staff at Gammasphere is gratefully acknowledged. This work was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Physics, under grants DE-FG02-95ER40939 (MSU), DE-AC02-06CH11357 (ANL), DE-FG02-95ER40934 (UND) and the National Science Foundation under grants PHY-1203100 (USNA), PHY-1068192 (UND).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S MUKHOPADHYAY.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MUKHOPADHYAY, S., MA, W.C. Nuclear triaxiality in the A ∼ 160–170 mass region: the story so far. Pramana - J Phys 83, 729–737 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-014-0864-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-014-0864-9

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation