Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modelling of source parameters of local earthquakes and seismotectonic implications in Siang Valley, NE India

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A moderate size earthquake (ML 5.9) occurred near Mechuka in Siang Valley on 23rd April 2019 at 20:15:50.00 UTC in the rupture zone of the great Assam earthquake of 15th August 1950. This shallow-focused earthquake occurred close to NE trending Main Central Thrust has a thrust fault mechanism striking parallel to this major tectonics of the Himalaya. Including this event, a dataset of 46 local, micro and low magnitude earthquakes (1.5 ≤ ML ≤ 5.9) of the Siang Valley of Arunachal Pradesh, NE India, are evaluated for the characteristics of the earthquake source, seismicity, stress drop and tectonic structures. The earthquake events were recorded by a close digital network of eight broadband seismic stations installed in December 2018 in the Siang Valley. The stress drop (Δσ) obtained for the Mechuka earthquake in the Siang Valley is 114.71 bars, the seismic moment (Mo) of 6.86E + 16 Nm and the source radius (r) of 1392.41 m. The seismic moments obtained from the microearthquakes vary between 2.44E + 11 and 6.86E + 16 Nm, and the source radius varies from 172.90 to 1392.41 m based on Brune’s circular source model 1970. The corner frequencies (fc) of the events range from 1.03 to 8.04 Hz. Seismically intense clustering of microearthquakes has a low-stress drop below 10 bar except for the Mechuka earthquake, which varies from 0.05 to 114.72. This high-stress drop of moderate earthquake compared to its low values of lower magnitude earthquakes indicates that the earthquake of 23rd April 2019 is associated with high-strength material accumulating high strain during the earthquake-building process. Moment magnitude of whole data set ranges from 1.52 to 5.16. The scaling relationship between Mo and fc is obtained as 9.089E + 16fc–9.52, and for Mo and Δσ are modelled to be related as Mo = 8.96E + 10Δσ2.86. Evaluated low-stress drop for the smaller size of earthquakes shows brittleness of the upper crustal region.

Research highlights

  • Modelling of earthquake source parameters to obtain scaling relations for Siang Valley, Arunachal Pradesh.

  • The estimated Mo, fc, r, ∆σ and Mw are 2.44 × 1011 to 6.86 × 1016 Nm, 1.03–8.04 Hz, 172.90–1392.41 m, 0.05–114.71 bar and 1.52–5.16, respectively.

  • Scaling relation between Mo and fc, Mo and Δσ and Mw and fc is Mo = 9.089E + 16fc−9.52, Mo = 8.96E + 10 Δσ2.86 and Log fc = –0.39Mw + 2.39, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharyya S K 2007 Evolution of the Himalayan Paleogene foreland basin, influence of its litho-packet on the formation of thrust-related domes and windows in the Eastern Himalayas – A review; J. Asian Earth Sci. 31(1) 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharyya S K and Saha P 2013 Age and tectono-magmatic setting of Abor volcanics, Siang window, eastern Himalayan syntaxial Area, India; J. Appl. Geochem. 15(2) 170–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allmann B B and Shearer P M 2009 Global variations of stress drop for moderate to large earthquakes; J. Geophys. Res. 114 B1, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys N N and Douglas J 2004 Magnitude calibration of north Indian earthquakes; Geophys. J. Int. 159 165–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelier J and Baruah S 2009 Seismotectonics in northeast India: A stress analysis of focal mechanism solutions of earthquakes and its kinematic implications; Geophys. J. Int. 178(1) 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archuleta R J, Cranswick E, Mueller C and Spudich P 1982 Source parameters of the 1980 Mammoth lakes, California, earthquake sequence; J. Geophys. Res. 87 4595–4607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruah B, Kumar P, Ravi Kumar M and Ganguli S S 2016 Stress-drop variations and source-scaling relations of moderate earthquakes of the Indian Tectonic Plate; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 106(6) 2640–2652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruah S, D'Amico S, Saikia S, Gautam J L, Devi R K M, Boruah G K, Sharma A and Abdelwahed M F 2018 Study of fault plane solution and stress drop using local broadband network data: The 2011 Sikkim Himalaya earthquake of MW 6.9 and its aftershocks; Ann. Geophys. 61(1) SE107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Menahem A, Aboodi E and Schild R 1974 The source of the great Assam earthquake – an interplate wedge motion; Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 9 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya P M, Saurabh B and Kayal J R 2010 Earthquake source zone in northeast India: Seismic tomography, fractal dimension and b-value mapping; Pure Appl. Geophys. 167 999–1012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-010-0084-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore D M and Boatwright J 1984 Average body-wave radiation coefficients; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74 1615–1621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bora D K, Baruah S, Biswas R and Gogoi N K 2013 Estimation of source parameters of local earthquakes originated in Shillong-Mikir plateau and its adjoining region of northeastern India; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103(1) 437–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bora D K, Mukherjee P, Singh A P, Borah K and Biswas R 2021 Source parameters and scaling relations for small to moderate earthquakes in the Indo-Burma Ranges, north-east India, and its seismotectonic implications; Geol. J. 57(2) 863–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brune J N 1970 Tectonic stress and spectral of seismic shear waves from earthquakes; J. Geophys. Res. 75 4997–5009, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB075i026p04997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureaue of Indian Standard IS 2002 Indian Standard, Criteria for earthquake resistance design of structures, Fifth Revision, Part-I, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.

  • Chandra U 1978 Seismicity, earthquake mechanisms and tectonics along the Himalayan mountain range and vicinity; Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 16 109–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield C 1989 Statistics of technology – A course in applied statistics; 3rd edn (revised); Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 166–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhuri B K, Gururajan N S and Singh R K B 2009 Geology and structural evolution of the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis; Him. Geol. 30(1) 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coudurier-Curveur A, Tapponnier P, Okal E, van der Woerd J, Kali E, Choudhury S, Baruah S, Etchebes M and Karakas Ç 2020 A composite rupture model for the great 1950 Assam earthquake across the cusp of the East Himalayan Syntaxis; Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 531 115928.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Havskov J and Ottemoller L 1999 Seisan earthquake analysis software; Seismol. Res. Lett. 70(5) 532–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazarika P and Kumar M R 2012 Seismicity and source parameters of moderate earthquakes in Sikkim Himalaya; Nat. Hazards 62 936–952, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0122-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt W E, James N F, Wallace C T and Haines A J 1991 The active tectonics of the eastern Himalayan Syntaxis and surrounding regions; J. Geophys. Res. 96(B9) 14,595–14,632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H and Brodsky E E 2001 The physics of earthquake; Phys. Today 54 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayal J R 1993 Earthquake source processes in north-east India: Review; Him. Geol. 17 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayal J R, Arefiev S S, Barua S, Hazarika D, Gogoi N, Kumar A and Kalita S 2006 Shillong plateau earthquakes in northeast India region: Complex tectonic model; Curr. Sci. 91 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keilis-Borok V I 1959 An estimation of the displacement in earthquake source and source dimensions; Ann. Geofos 12 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattri K N and Wyss M 1978 Precursory variation of seismicity rate in Assam area, India; Geology 6 685–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Gupta S C, Kumar A, Sen A, Jindal A K and Jain S 2006 Estimation of source parameters from local earthquakes in western part of the Arunachal Lesser Himalaya; In: 13th Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 9–17.

  • Kumar N, Sharma J, Arora B R and Mukhopadhyay S 2009 Seismotectonic-model of the Kangra–Chamba sector of northwest Himalaya: Constraints from joint hypocenter determination and focal mechanism; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 99(1) 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Arora B R, Mukhopadhyay S and Yadav D K 2013a Seismogenesis of clustered seismicity beneath the Kangra–Chamba sector of northwest Himalaya: Constraints from 3D local earthquake tomography; J. Asian Earth Sci. 62 638–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Kumar A, Gupta S C, Mittal H and Kumar R 2013b Source parameters and fmax in lower Siang region of Arunachal Lesser Himalaya; Arab. J. Geosci. 8 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Kumar A, Gupta S C and Kumar A 2014 Attenuation characteristic of seismic body waves for the crust of lower Siang region of Arunachal Himalaya; Int. J. Adv. Res. 2(6) 742–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundu A and Hazarika D 2022 Estimation of source parameters and scaling relation for local earthquakes of Lohit Valley in Arunachal Himalaya Northeast India; Geol. J. 57(2) 4872–4885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee W H K and Lahr J C 1975 A computer programme for determining hypocenter, magnitude and first motion pattern of local earthquakes, HYPO71 (revised); US Geological Survey, Open-File Report 75-311:1–116.

  • Madariaga R 1976 Dynamics of an expanding circular fault; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 66(3) 639–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandy D R and Dasgupta S 1991 Seismotectonic domains of northeastern India and adjacent areas; Phys. Chem. Earth 18 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padhy S and Subhadra N 2010 Attenuation of high-frequency seismic waves in northeast India; Geophys. J. Int. 181 453–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poddar M C 1950 The Assam earthquake of 15th August 1950; Ind. Mineral. 4 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma R K, Mukhopadhyay M and Nag A K 1979 Seismicity and tectonics in S. China and Burma; Tectonophysics 64 84–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav D K 2002 Seismotectonic of Arunachal Himalaya Dibrugarh University; PhD Thesis, 98p.

  • Yadav D K, Devajit Hazarika, Naresh Kumar and Singh A K 2021 Microseismicity study in the Siang Valley of Arunachal Himalaya: Tectonic Implications of the 2019 Mw 5.9 Mechuka earthquake; Him. Geol. 42(2) 290–298.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Director of WIHG, Dehradun, India, for their encouragement and permission to carry out the present work. The first author also thanks the UGC for financial support during research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, 33, GMS Road, Dehradun, 248 001, India

    Ashish Pal, Dilip Kumar Yadav, Naresh Kumar, Abhishek Kumar Gupta & Ajay Paul

  2. H.N.B. Garhwal Central University, Srinagar, 246 174, India

    Ashish Pal & H C Nainwal

Authors
  1. Ashish Pal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dilip Kumar Yadav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naresh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abhishek Kumar Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ajay Paul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H C Nainwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Ashish Pal (AP) did initial data preparations, investigation, and calculation of source parameters and writing of the original draft. DKY did conceptualization, visualization, investigation, data curation, supervision, project administration and writing of manuscript. NKD, AKG and A Paul contributed to the discussion of the manuscript. HC Nainwal did supervision and validation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilip Kumar Yadav.

Additional information

Communicated by Sagarika Mukhopadhyay

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pal, A., Yadav, D.K., Kumar, N. et al. Modelling of source parameters of local earthquakes and seismotectonic implications in Siang Valley, NE India. J Earth Syst Sci 133, 63 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-024-02272-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-024-02272-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation