Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of atmospheric boundary layer structure using monostatic SODAR system over Mumbai region

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL) height variability, along with meteorological parameters and pollutant concentrations, are studied during different months in Mumbai region for the period of November 2020 to October 2021. ABL height is measured using a monostatic SODAR (SOnic Detection And Ranging) system. The capabilities, behaviour, and benefits of employing this ground-based remote sensing system in Mumbai are examined in this preliminary report after a year of SODAR monitoring. SODAR dataset is also compared with Radiosonde input ERA5 reanalysis data. The ventilation coefficient (VC) analysis for the same time period is also covered in the paper. Especially in the months of November, December, January, February, August, September, and October, the ABL height often approached 700 m. The ABL height is increased to 1000–1200 m in April because of the strong winds and warm weather. The month of April has the greatest monthly average height (418 m), while the month of February has the lowest monthly average height (179 m). In April, when the wind speed is 7.2 m/s, the convection duration is observed to be the longest, while in December, when the wind speed is 1.75 m/s, it is the shortest.

Research highlights

  • For the first time, real-time hourly atmospheric boundary layer height data measured from SODAR system are analysed over the Mumbai region.

  • The ABL height often reached 700 m, especially in the months of November, December, January, February, August, September, and October.

  • Due to the high wind and warmth in April, the ABL height is extended to 1000–1200 m.

  • The highest ventilation coefficient values around 7095 m2/s are recorded in the month of April, while the lowest values around 2912 m2/s are recorded in the months of November and December.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal S K, Singal S P, Kapoor R K and Adiga B B 1980 A study of atmospheric structures using sodar in relation to land and sea breezes; Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 18(4) 361–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beran D W and Hall F F Jr 1974 Remote sensing for air pollution meteorology; Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 55(9) 1097–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyrich F 1997 Mixing height estimation from sodar data – a critical discussion; Atmos. Environ. 31(23) 3941–3953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyrich F, Acker K, Kala D, Klemm O, Möller D, Schaller E, Werhahn J and Weisensee U 1996 Boundary layer structure and photochemical pollution in the Harz Mountains – An observational study; Atmos. Environ. 30(8) 1271–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bontempi E and Coccia M 2021 International trade as critical parameter of COVID-19 spread that outclasses demographic, economic, environmental, and pollution factors; Environ. Res. 201 111514, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley S 2007 Atmospheric Acoustic Remote Sensing: Principles and Applications; CRC Press, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420005288.

  • Brown E H and Hall F F Jr 1978 Advances in atmospheric acoustics; Rev. Geophys. 16(1) 47–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chourey P, Singh N J, Soni K and Agarwal R 2022a A novel signal conditioning system for SODAR; Meas. Sci. Technol. 33(11) 115801, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ac83e0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chourey P, Soni K, Singh N J and Agarwal R 2022b IoT-SODAR network for airshed management planning; IETE J. Res., https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2022.2026826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CPCB Report 1992 National Ambient Air Quality Statistics of India; https://cpcb.nic.in/.

  • EPA Report 2000 Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications, EPA; https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-10/documents/mmgrma_0.pdf.

  • Garratt J R 1994 The atmospheric boundary layers; Earth Sci. Rev. 37(1–2) 89–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gera B S, Raghavendra T, Singh G, Ojha V K, Malik J, Gera N and Gupta N C 2011 Instrumentation and computer capabilities for improving sodar data acquisition; Int. J. Remote Sens. 32(17) 4807–4817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gera B S, Gera N, Gupta N C, Malik J, Singh G and Ojha V K 2013 Sodar studies of coastal boundary layer characteristics; https://www.ursi.org/proceedings/procGA08/papers/F02p5.pdf.

  • Hersbach H, Bell B and Berrisford P et al. 2020 The ERA5 global reanalysis; Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 146 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzworth G C 1972 Mixing heights, wind speeds, and potential for urban air pollution throughout the contiguous United States; US Government Printing Office.

  • Iwai H, Murayama Y, Ishii S, Mizutani K, Ohno Y and Hashiguchi T 2011 Strong updraft at a sea-breeze front and associated vertical transport of near-surface dense aerosol observed by Doppler lidar and ceilometer; Layer Meteorol. 141 117–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallistratova M A 1963 Experimental investigation of sound wave scattering in the atmosphere; Foreign Technology Division, Wright-Patterson, AFB, OHIO.

  • KiranKumar N V P, Jagadeesh K, Niranjan K and Rajeev K 2019 Seasonal variations of sea breeze and its effect on the spectral behaviour of surface layer winds in the coastal zone near Visakhapatnam, India; J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 186 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna T R, Reddy M K, Reddy R C and Singh R N 2004 Assimilative capacity and dispersion of pollutants due to industrial sources in Visakhapatnam bowl area; Atmos. Environ. 38(39) 6775–6787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N K, Rao C K, Sandeep A and Rao T N 2014 SODAR observations of inertia-gravity waves in the atmospheric boundary layer during the passage of tropical cyclone; Atmos. Sci. Lett. 15(2) 120–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Gupta I, Brandt J, Kumar R, Dikshit A K and Patil R S 2016 Air quality mapping using GIS and economic evaluation of health impact for Mumbai city, India; J. Air Waste Manag. 66(5) 470–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Soni K, Garg N, Agarwal R, Saha D, Singh M and Singh G 2017a SODAR pattern classification and its dependence on meteorological parameters over a semiarid region of India; Int. J. Remote Sens. 38(11) 3466–3482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Soni K, Agarwal R and Singh M 2017b SODAR as a diagnostics tool for urban air-quality and health care system; J. Acoust. Soc. India 44 213–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Soni K and Agarwal R 2021a A comprehensive study of different feature selection methods and machine-learning techniques for SODAR structure classification; Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 7(1) 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Soni K and Agarwal R 2021b Design and development of SODAR Antenna structure; MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc. I. 36(4) 785–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Soni K and Agarwal R 2021c Prediction of temporal atmospheric boundary layer height using long short-term memory network; Tellus a: Dyn. Meteorol. Oceanogr. 73(1) 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao L, Du M and Chen Z 2021 Air pollution, health care use and medical costs: Evidence from China; Energy Econ. 95 105132, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy B S, Latha R, Tiwari A, Rathod A, Singh S and Beig G 2020 Impact of mixing layer height on air quality in winter; J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 197 105157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.105157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir U P and Brahmaiah D 2015 Impact of fireworks on ambient air quality: A case study; Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12(4) 1379–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prabha T V, Venkatesan R, Mursch-Radlgruber E, Rengarajan G and Jayanthi N 2002 Thermal internal boundary layer characteristics at a tropical coastal site as observed by a mini-SODAR under varying synoptic conditions; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 111(1) 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy T V, Mehta S K, Ananthavel A, Ali S, Annamalai V and Rao D N 2021 Seasonal characteristics of sea breeze and thermal internal boundary layer over Indian east coast region; Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 133(2) 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha D, Soni K, Mohanan M N and Singh M 2019 Long-term trend of ventilation coefficient over Delhi and its potential impacts on air quality; Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc. Environ. 15 100234, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2019.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibert P, Beyrich F, Gryning S E, Joffre S, Rasmussen A and Tercier P 2000 Review and intercomparison of operational methods for the determination of the mixing height; Atmos. Environ. 34(7) 1001–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta B 2008 Epidemiological study on effect of air pollution on human health (adults) in Delhi; https://cpcb.nic.in/uploads/healthreports/Epidemiological_study_Adult_Peer%20reviewed-2012.pdf.

  • Simmons W R, Wescott J W and Hall F F 1971 Acoustic echo sounding as related to air pollution in urban environments; Vol. 2, Environmental Research Laboratories.

  • Singal S P 1991 SODAR studies of sea breeze circulation of Indian coastline; Indian J. Radio Space Phys. 20 397–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singal S P 1993 Monitoring air pollution related meteorology using sodar; Appl. Phys. B Photophys. Laser Chem. 57(1) 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singal S P and Aggarwal S K 1979 Sodar & radiosonde studies of thermal structure of the lower atmosphere at Delhi; Indian J. Radio Space Phys. 8 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singal S P, Aggarwal S K, Pahwa D R and Gera B S 1985 Stability studies with the help of acoustic sounding; Atmos. Environ. 19(2) 221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singal S P, Gera B S and Pahwa D R 1994 Application of sodar to air pollution meteorology; Remote Sens. 15(2) 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singal S P, Gera B S and Saxena N 1997 Sodar: A tool to characterise hazardous situations in air pollution and communication; In: Acoustic Remote Sens. Appl. (ed.) Sagar Pal Singal, pp. 325–384.

  • Stull R B 1988 An introduction to boundary layer meteorology; Vol. 13, Springer Science & Business Media, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8.

  • Sujatha P, Mahalakshmi D V, Ramiz A, Rao P V N and Naidu C V 2016 Ventilation coefficient and boundary layer height impact on urban air quality; Cogent Environ. Sci. 2(1) 1125284, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2015.1125284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot C, Augustin P, Leroy C, Willart V, Delbarre H and Khomenko G 2007 Impact of a sea breeze on the boundary-layer dynamics and the atmospheric stratification in a coastal area of the North Sea; Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 125(1) 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittal Murty K P R, Viswanadham D V and Sadhuram Y 1980 Mixing heights and ventilation coefficients for urban centres in India; Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 19(4) 441–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner P and Schäfer K 2017 Influence of mixing layer height on air pollutant concentrations in an urban street canyon; Urban Clim. 22 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Director, CSIR-Advanced Materials and Processes Research Institute (AMPRI), Bhopal, for providing the necessary facilities to accomplish the work. The authors are also thankful to the Chairman, Maharashtra Pollution Control Board, Mumbai, for providing funding support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NK and KS are responsible for conceptualisation, data analysis, and writing-original draft. ASN and KAR are responsible for data generation. AAS, AJ and VMM are responsible for proofreading and finalising the draft. VKS and AK are responsible for Radiosonde measurements.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirti Soni.

Additional information

Communicated by T Narayana Rao

Supplementary material pertaining to this article is available on the Journal of Earth System Science website (http://www.ias.ac.in/Journals/Journal_of_Earth_System_Science).

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 848 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, N., Nair, A.S., Soni, K. et al. Characteristics of atmospheric boundary layer structure using monostatic SODAR system over Mumbai region. J Earth Syst Sci 132, 177 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-023-02191-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-023-02191-1

Keywords

Navigation