Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

C-equivalent correction factor for soil organic carbon inventory by wet oxidation, dry combustion and loss on ignition methods in Himalayan region

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is an important parameter to study the carbon cycle as soil carbon stock inventory as well as to serve as prime indicator in assessing soil health and soil quality. The present study was attempted to investigate C-equivalent correction factor for SOC by Walkley–Black (wet oxidation) and loss on ignition (LOI) methods in relation to TOC analyzer (dry combustion) method. TOC analyzer method supposed to be the best method of total soil organic carbon estimation. Soil sample from 77 sites representing dominant land use/land cover types of crop land, forest and scrub cover were collected in Himalayan region of Uttarakhand state, India. Surface (0–15 cm) and sub-surface (15–30 cm) soil samples were used for estimation of SOC by these three methods. C-equivalent correction factor ranged from 1.10 to 1.17 for SOC determination by Walkley and Black method to TOC analyzer method, whereas it varied from 0.257 to 0.417 for soil organic matter (SOM) by LOI method to TOC analyzer for soils under various land use/land cover types in the Himalayan region. The recovery of SOC by Walkley–Black method varied from 86.84 to 91.04% in the soils of various land use/land cover in the Himalayan landscape. Thus, there is need to develop specific correction factor for soils under various land use/land cover types for improved estimation of soil carbon stock. The regression models developed in the study can be directly used to obtain TOC analyzer equivalent total carbon contents in the soils (surface and sub-surface) for computation of soil carbon stock in Himalayan region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison L E 1960 Wet-combustion apparatus and procedure for organic and inorganic carbon in soil; Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 24 36–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apolonia O and Grazyna P 2012 Assessment of TOC–SOM and SOM–TOC conversion in forest soil; Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 21 1767–1775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker G O 1936 A study of the practicability of the Walkley–Black method for determining soil organic matter; Soil Sci. 41 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya T, Chandran P, Ray S K, Mandal C, Tiwary P, Pal D K, Maurya U K, Nimkar A M, Kuchankar H, Sheikh S, Telpande B A and Kolhe A 2015 Walkley–Black recovery factor to reassess soil organic matter: Indo-Gangetic plains and black soil region of India case studies; Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 46 2628–2648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisutti I, Hilke I and Raessler M 2004 Determination of total organic carbon – An overview of current methods; Trends Analyst. Chem. 23 716–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent F E 1953 The soil organic fraction; Adv. Agron. 5 153–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chabbi A, Kogel-Knabner L and Rumpel C 2009 Stabilized carbon in subsoil horizon is located in spatially distinct parts of soil profile; Soil Biol. Biochem. 41 256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua A M and Tokura T 2004 Total organic carbon in soil; Shimadzu Application news, May 2004.

  • Davies B E 1974 Loss-on-Ignition as an estimate of soil organic matter; Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 38 150–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vos B, Lettens S, Muys B and Deckers J A 2007 Walkley–Black analysis of forest soil organic carbon, limitations and uncertainty; Soil Use Manag. 23 221–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Zorita M 1999 Soil organic carbon recovery by the Walkley–Black method in a Typic Hapludoll; Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 30 739–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieckow J, Mielniczuk J, Knicker H, Bayer C, Dick D P and Kogel-Knaber I 2007 Comparison of carbon and nitrogen determination methods for samples of a peleudult subjected to no-till cropping systems; Sci. Agric. 64 532–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florent T, Joao Carlos de Moraes Sa, Paulo R B, Philippe L, Clever B, Ademir O F, Josiane B dos Santos and Thiago Massao Inagaki 2011 Soil carbon inventory by wet oxidation and dry combustion methods: Effect of land use, soil texture, gradients and sampling depth on linear model of C-equivalent correction factor; Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 76 1048–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontan J M, Calvache S, Lopez-Bellido R J and Lopez-Bellido L 2010 Soil carbon measurement in clods and sieved sample in a Mediterranean Vertisol by visible near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy; Geoderma 156 93–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatto A, Barros N F, Novais R F, Silva I R, Mendonca E D and Vaillani E M D 2009 Comparison of methods for determination of organic carbon in soils under eucalypt plantation; Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo. 33 735–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goidts E, Wesemael B and Crucifix M 2009 Magnitude and sources of uncertainties in soil organic carbon (SOC) stock assessment at various scales; Eur. J. Soil. Sci. 60 723–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain T B, Graham R T and Adams D L 1997 Carbon to organic matter ratios for soil in rocky Mountain coniferous forests; Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61 1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankauskas B, Slepetience A, Jankauskiene G, Fullen M A and Booth C A 2006 A comparative study of analytical methodologies to determine the soil organic matter content of Lithuanian Eutric Albeluvisols; Geoderma 136 763–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser M, Ellerbrock R H and Gerke H H 2007 Long-term effects of crop rotation and fertilization on soil organic matter composition; Eur. J. Soil Sci. 58 1460–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishan G, Srivastav S K, Kumar S, Saha S K and Dadhwal V K 2009 Quantifying the underestimation of soil organic carbon by Walkley and Black technique-examples from Himalayan and Central Indian Soils; Curr. Sci. 96(8) 1133–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighty W R and Shorey E C 1930 Some carbon–nitrogen relations in soils; Soil Sci. 30 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lettens S, Vos B D, Quataert P, Wesemael B, Muys B and Orshoven J 2007 Variable carbon recovery of Walkley–Black analysis and implication of national soil organic accounting; Eur. J. Soil Sci. 58 1244–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunt H A 1931 The carbon–organic matter factor in forest soil humus; Soil Sci. 32 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matejovic I 1997 Determination of carbon and nitrogen in samples of various soils by the dry combustion; Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 28 1499–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meersmans J, Wesemael B V and Molle M V 2009 Determining soil organic carbon for agriculture soils: Comparison between the Walkley and Black and dry combustion methods (north Belgium); Soil Use Manag. 25 346–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailova E A, Nobel R R P and Post C J 2003 Comparison of soil organic carbon recovery by Walkely–Black and dry combustion methods in the Russian Chernozein; Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 34 1853–1860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell J 1932 The origin, nature, and importance of soil organic constituents having base exchange properties; J. Am. Soc. Agron. 24 256–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson W and Sommers L E 1996 Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Method of soil analysis. Part 3: Chemical methods (ed.) Sparks D L, SSSA Book Ser. 5. SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 961–1010.

  • Ogle S M, Breidt F J, Eve M D and Paustian K 2003 Uncertainty in estimating land use and management impacts on soil organic carbon storage for US agriculture lands between 1982 and 1997; Gobal Change Biol. 9 1521–1542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pe’rez D V, de Alcantara S, Arruda R J and Amaral Meneghelli N 2001 Comparing two methods for soil carbon and nitrogen determination using selected Brazilian soils; Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 32 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher B A 2002 Methods for the determination of total organic carbon (TOC) in soils and sediments, Ecological Risk Assessment Support Center, US EPA.

  • Shepherd K D and Walsh M G 2002 Development of reflectance spectral libraries for characterization of soil properties; Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66 988–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidhu G S and Surya J N 2014 Soils of North-Western Himalayan eco-system and their land use constraints, productivity potentials and future strategies; Agropedology 24(01) 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soon Y K and Abboud S 1991 A comparison of some methods for soil organic carbon determination; Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 30 2299–2310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varvel G E, Liebig M A and Doran J W 2002 Soil Organic Matter Assessments in a long term cropping system study; Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 33 2119–2130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A and Black I A 1934a An examination of Degtjareff method for determining organic carbon in soils: Effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents; Soil Sci. 63 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A and Black I A 1934b An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method; Soil Sci. 37 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X J, Smethurst P J and Herbert A M 1996 Relationship between three measures of organic matter or carbon in soils of eucalypt plantation in Tasmania; Aust. J. Soil Res. 34 545–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeomans J C and Bremner J M 1988 A rapid and precise method for routine determination of organic carbon in soil; Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 19 1467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are sincerely grateful for financial support provided under the ISRO–Geosphere Biosphere Program (IGBP) of the Department of Space. Authors sincerely thank Director, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS) and Director, National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC), Hyderabad, for their kind support and constant encouragement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, 4 Kalidas Road, Dehradun, 248 001, India

    Suresh Kumar & Yogesh Sopan Ghotekar

  2. Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, ISRO, Thiruvananthapuram, India

    Vinay K Dadhwal

Authors
  1. Suresh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yogesh Sopan Ghotekar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vinay K Dadhwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suresh Kumar.

Additional information

Corresponding editor: Navin Juyal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, S., Ghotekar, Y.S. & Dadhwal, V.K. C-equivalent correction factor for soil organic carbon inventory by wet oxidation, dry combustion and loss on ignition methods in Himalayan region. J Earth Syst Sci 128, 62 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1086-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1086-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation