Abstract
The present study examines the dynamics of mid-tropospheric vortex during cyclogenesis and quantifies the importance of such vortex developments in the intensification of tropical cyclone. The genesis of tropical cyclones are investigated based on two most widely accepted theories that explain the mechanism of cyclone formation namely ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ dynamics. The Weather Research and Forecast model is employed to generate high resolution dataset required for analysis. The development of the mid-level vortex was analyzed with regard to the evolution of potential vorticity (PV), relative vorticity (RV) and vertical wind shear. Two tropical cyclones which include the developing cyclone, Hudhud and the non-developing cyclone, Helen are considered. Further, Hudhud and Helen, is compared to a deep depression formed over Bay of Bengal to highlight the significance of the mid-level vortex in the genesis of a tropical cyclone. Major results obtained are as follows: stronger positive PV anomalies are noticed over upper and lower levels of troposphere near the storm center for Hudhud as compared to Helen and the depression; Constructive interference in upper and lower level positive PV anomaly maxima resulted in the intensification of Hudhud. For Hudhud, the evolution of RV follows ‘top-down’ dynamics, in which the growth starts from the middle troposphere and then progresses downwards. As for Helen, RV growth seems to follow ‘bottom-up’ mechanism initiating growth from the lower troposphere. Though, the growth of RV for the depression initiates from mid-troposphere, rapid dissipation of mid-level vortex destabilizes the system. It is found that the formation mid-level vortex in the genesis phase is significantly important for the intensification of the storm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alpert P, Krichak S, Krishnamurti T, Stein U and Tsidulko M 1996 The relative roles of lateral boundaries, initial conditions, and topography in mesoscale simulations of lee cyclogenesis; J. Appl. Meteorol. 35 1091–1099.
Black M, Gamache J, Marks Jr F, Samsury C and Willoughby H 2002 Eastern Pacific Hurricanes Jimena of 1991 and Olivia of 1994: The effect of vertical shear on structure and intensity; Mon. Weather Rev. 130 2291–2312.
Corbosiero K L and Molinari J 2003 The relationship between storm motion, vertical wind shear, and convective asymmetries in tropical cyclones; J. Atmos. Sci. 60 366–376.
Delden A V 2003 Adjustment to heating, potential vorticity and cyclogenesis; Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 129 3305–3322.
DeMaria M and Kaplan J 1999 An updated statistical hurricane intensity prediction scheme (SHIPS) for the Atlantic and eastern North Pacific basins; Wea. Forecasting 14 326–337.
Dudhia J 1989 Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model; J. Atmos. Sci. 46 3077–3107.
Frank W M and Ritchie E A 2001 Effects of vertical wind shear on the intensity and structure of numerically simulated hurricanes; Mon. Weather Rev. 129 2249–2269.
Gjorgjievska S and Raymond D J 2014 Interaction between dynamics and thermodynamics during tropical cyclogenesis; Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14 3065–3082.
Halverson J and co-authors 2007 NASA’s tropical cloud systems and processes experiment: Investigating tropical cyclogenesis and hurricane intensity change; Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 88 867–882.
Haynes P and McIntyre M 1987 On the evolution of vorticity and potential vorticity in the presence of diabatic heating and frictional or other forces; J. Atmos. Sci. 44 828–841.
Hendricks, E A, Montgomery M T and Davis C A 2004 The role of ‘vortical’ hot towers in the formation of tropical cyclone Diana (1984); J. Atmos. Sci. 61 1209–1232.
Hong S-Y, Dudhia J and Chen S-H 2004 A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation; Mon. Weather Rev. 132 103–120.
Hong S-Y, Noh Y and Dudhia J 2006 A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes; Mon. Weather Rev. 134 2318–2341.
Hoskins B J, McIntyre M and Robertson A W 1985 On the use and significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps; Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 111 877–946.
Mlawer E J, Taubman S J, Brown P D, Iacono M J and Clough S A 1997 Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave; J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 102 16,663–16,682.
Molinari J, Skubis S and Vollaro D 1995 External influences on hurricane intensity. Part III: Potential vorticity structure; J. Atmos. Sci. 52 3593–3606.
Molinari J, Skubis S, Vollaro D, Alsheimer F and Willoughby H E 1998 Potential vorticity analysis of tropical cyclone intensification; J. Atmos. Sci. 55 2632–2644.
Montgomery M, Nicholls M, Cram T and Saunders A 2006 A vortical hot tower route to tropical cyclogenesis; J. Atmos. Sci. 63 355–386.
NCEP 2000 National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce: NCEP FNL Operational Model Global Tropospheric Analyses, continuing from July 1999, Boulder, CO, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6M043C6, Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory.
Raymond D, Sessions S and López Carrillo C 2011 Thermodynamics of tropical cyclogenesis in the northwest Pacific; J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 116.
Ritchie E A and Holland G J 1997 Scale interactions during the formation of Typhoon Irving; Mon. Weather Rev. 125 1377–1396.
Simpson J, Ritchie E, Holland G, Halverson J and Stewart S 1997 Mesoscale interactions in tropical cyclone genesis; Mon. Weather Rev. 125 2643–2661.
Sippel J A and Zhang F 2008 A probabilistic analysis of the dynamics and predictability of tropical cyclogenesis; J. Atmos. Sci. 65 3440–3459.
Skamarock W C, Klemp J B, Dudhia J, Gill D O, Barker D M, Wang W and Powers J G 2005 A description of the Advanced Research WRF; version 2, NCAR Technical note -468+STR.
Tewari M and Coauthors 2004 Implementation and verification of the unified NOAH land surface model in the WRF model; 20th Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/16th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, pp. 11–15.
Tory K, Montgomery M and Davidson N 2006 Prediction and diagnosis of tropical cyclone formation in an NWP system. Part I: The critical role of vortex enhancement in deep convection; J. Atmos. Sci. 63 3077–3090.
Wang Z 2012 Thermodynamic aspects of tropical cyclone formation; J. Atmos. Sci. 69 2433–2451.
Xu Y and Wang Y 2013 On the initial development of asymmetric vertical motion and horizontal relative flow in a mature tropical cyclone embedded in environmental vertical shear; J. Atmos. Sci. 70 3471–3491.
Zeng Z, Wang Y and Chen L 2010 A statistical analysis of vertical shear effect on tropical cyclone intensity change in the North Atlantic; Geophys. Res. Lett. 37.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by funding from Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, India. The authors would like to thank Sreejith Nhaloor for providing NCL codes for plotting figures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Corresponding editor: Kavirajan Rajendran
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kutty, G., Gohil, K. The role of mid-level vortex in the intensification and weakening of tropical cyclones. J Earth Syst Sci 126, 94 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0879-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0879-y