Skip to main content
Log in

Random fractal characters and length uncertainty of the continental coastline of China

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A coastline is a random fractal object in a geographical system whose length is uncertain. To determine the coastline length of a country or a region, the scaling region and fractal dimension of the coastline is first calculated, and then, the length of the coastline is measured using the scale at the lower limit or near the limit of the scaling region. For this study, the scaling region of the continental coastline of China is determined. The box-counting dimension was calculated with ArcGIS software using 33 scales and a map scale of 1:500,000, and the divider dimension calculated by a C language program. Moreover, the reliability of the Chinese coastline length value, which is widely used currently, is discussed in this paper. The results show that the scaling region of the continental coastline of China is from 0.1 to 400 km. In the scaling region, the box-counting dimension and the divider dimension of the coastline are 1.2004 and 1.0929, respectively. According to fractal theory, the divider dimension more accurately represents the irregularity of a coastline. The length of the continental coastline of China is approximately 21,900 km when the measurement scale is 0.1 km; however, the length is 18,214 km when the scale is 0.25 km, and this value approaches the continental length of China (18,400 km) in popular use today. Although the coastline length is shorter than 21,900 km, the length is acceptable because the measurement scale (0.25 km) is close to the lower limit of the scaling region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carr J R and Benzer W B 1991 On the practice of estimating fractal dimension; Math. Geol. 23 (7) 945–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimri V P 1998 Fractal behavior and detectibility limits of geophysical surveys; Geophysics 63 (6) 1943–1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder J 1988 Fractals; Plenum Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild M F and Mark D M 1987 The fractal nature of geographic phenomena; Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 77 (2) 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassberger P 1993 On efficient box counting algorithms; Int J. Mod. Phys. C 4 (3) 515–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward J, Orford J D and Whalley W B 1989 Three implementations of fractal analysis of particle outlines; Comput. Geosci. 15 (2) 199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He M 1947 Foundation of Chinese Geography; Zhiyong Bookshop, Shanghai (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • He M, Chen E and Cheng L 1946 Introduction to Chinese Geography; Zhengzhong Bookshop, Nanjing (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang J and Plotnick R E 1998 Fractal analysis of the complexity of United States coastlines; Math. Geol. 30 (5) 535–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong T, Zheng Y and Du X 1914 Records of Chinese geography (Book I, Part II); Zhonghua Book Company, Shanghai (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Q and Jia Y 1994 Extension and contraction of coastline; Ocean World 6 9 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebovitch L S and Toth T 1989 A fast algorithm to determine fractal dimensions by box counting; Phys. Lett. A 141 (8) 386–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longley P A and Batty M 1989 On the fractal measurement of geographical boundaries; Geogr. Anal. 21 (1) 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B B 1967 How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension; Science 156 (3775) 636–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B B 1975 Stochastic models for the earth’s relief, the shape and the fractal dimension of the coastlines, and the number-area rule for islands; Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 72 (10) 3825–3828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B B 1977 Fractals: Form, Chance and Dimension; W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paar V, Cvitan M, Ocelić N and Josipović M 1997 Fractal dimension of coastline of the Croatian island Cres; Acta Geogr. Croat. 32 (1) 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips J D 1986 Spatial analysis of shoreline erosion, Delaware Bay, New Jersey; Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 76 (1) 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren M 1947 An Outline of Chinese Geography; Zhengzhong Bookshop, Nanjing (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma P and Byrne S 2010 Constraints on Titan’s topography through fractal analysis of shorelines; Icarus 209 (2) 723–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh H K and Gupta D 2013 Quantification analysis of chaotic fractal dimensions; Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2 (4) 1192–1199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su F, Gao Y, Zhou C, Yang X and Fei X 2011 Scale effects of the continental coastline of China; J. Geogr. Sci. 21 (6) 1101–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava R P, Vedanti N and Dimri V P 2007 Optimal design of a gravity survey network and its application to delineate the Jabera–Damoh structure in the Vindhyan Basin, central India; Pure Appl. Geophys. 164 (10) 2009–2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner B R, Perfect E and Kelley J T 2006 Fractal analysis of Maine’s glaciated shoreline tests established coastal classification scheme; J. Coast. Res. 22 (5) 1300–1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y 1996 Chinese Marine Geography; Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Zhang Z, Zhao X, Wen Q, Zuo L, Wang X and Yi L 2014 Spatial and temporal variations of coastlines in northern China (2000–2012); J. Geogr Sci. 24 (1) 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Qin K, Wu C and Chen L 2008 Simulation of coastlines based on cloud fractal; Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences (Shanghai, China), pp. 162–166.

  • Yong W 1985 Chinese Physical Geography; Shanghai Educational Publishing House, Shanghai (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Yang X, Xie W and Wang J 2000 On spatial fractal character of coastline: A case study of Jiangsu Province, China; China Ocean Eng. 14 (4) 533–540 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Cai Y and Yang X 2004 On fractal dimensions of China’s coastlines; Math. Geol. 36 (4) 447–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr D Shankar and an anonymous reviewer for their comments and suggestions that helped them to improve the quality of the manuscript. This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41171409 and 41430637), Humanities and Social Science Projects by Ministry of Education of China (No. 12JJD790023), Foundation of the Incubation Projects of Outstanding Graduate Student Dissertation of Henan University (No. Y1424004), and Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in University of Henan Province (No. 16IRTSTHN012)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JIANHUA MA.

Additional information

Corresponding editor: D Shankar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MA, J., LIU, D. & CHEN, Y. Random fractal characters and length uncertainty of the continental coastline of China. J Earth Syst Sci 125, 1615–1621 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0754-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0754-2

Keywords

Navigation